PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?Purim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavWhat is the traditional Jewish name for this dish?PtIJ: why a twisted 6PTIJ: Why does Hashem have an onionPTIJ: OTD DocumentariesPTIJ: How to make a palace out of peoplePTIJ: Why did the Torah forbid itself?PTIJ: Why can't I eat anything?PTIJ: Why did Mordecai wax his surfboard?PTIJ: Why is Rav Yitzchak's name backwards?PTIJ: Why do we blow Shofar on Rosh Hashana and use a Lulav on Sukkos?
Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?
Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?
When did hardware antialiasing start being available?
Is xar preinstalled on macOS?
Which partition to make active?
How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?
Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?
What is 管理しきれず?
What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?
Norwegian Refugee travel document
Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?
Would this string work as string?
What are the consequences of changing the number of hours in a day?
What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?
Knife as defense against stray dogs
Imaginary part of expression too difficult to calculate
Is there any common country to visit for uk and schengen visa?
Print last inputted byte
Could any one tell what PN is this Chip? Thanks~
Isn't the word "experience" wrongly used in this context?
What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?
Writing in a Christian voice
Recursively updating the MLE as new observations stream in
UK Tourist Visa- Enquiry
PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?
Purim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavWhat is the traditional Jewish name for this dish?PtIJ: why a twisted 6PTIJ: Why does Hashem have an onionPTIJ: OTD DocumentariesPTIJ: How to make a palace out of peoplePTIJ: Why did the Torah forbid itself?PTIJ: Why can't I eat anything?PTIJ: Why did Mordecai wax his surfboard?PTIJ: Why is Rav Yitzchak's name backwards?PTIJ: Why do we blow Shofar on Rosh Hashana and use a Lulav on Sukkos?
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
|
show 2 more comments
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
903212
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
43 mins ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
43 mins ago
add a comment |
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
43 mins ago
add a comment |
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 47 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
43 mins ago
add a comment |
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
43 mins ago
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
43 mins ago
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
43 mins ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 25 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
22.3k154129
answered 52 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
1095
add a comment |
add a comment |
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago