Arsthbt

Multi tool use

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

Maximum summed powersets with non-adjacent items

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages?

How do I make this wiring inside cabinet safer? (Pic)

If a VARCHAR(MAX) column is included in an index, is the entire value always stored in the index page(s)?

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?

Wu formula for manifolds with boundary

How to write this math term? with cases it isn't working

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?

Is it common practice to audition new musicians one-on-one before rehearsing with the entire band?

Where are Serre’s lectures at Collège de France to be found?

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Circuit to "zoom in" on mV fluctuations of a DC signal?

Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?

What is the longest distance a player character can jump in one leap?

Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?

Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

How to write this math term? with cases it isn't working

3

I can't find a way to write this in Latex. Any hints where to start?

math-mode

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

Debotush DamDebotush Dam

182

New contributor

Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Welcome to TeX.SE.
  
  – Mico
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

I can't find a way to write this in Latex. Any hints where to start?

math-mode

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

Debotush DamDebotush Dam

182

New contributor

Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Welcome to TeX.SE.
  
  – Mico
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I can't find a way to write this in Latex. Any hints where to start?

math-mode

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

Debotush DamDebotush Dam

182

New contributor

Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

Debotush DamDebotush Dam

182

New contributor

Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

Debotush DamDebotush Dam

182

New contributor

Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 1 hour ago

Debotush DamDebotush Dam

182

New contributor

Debotush Dam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 1 hour ago

Debotush DamDebotush Dam

182

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

3

A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'drcases' environment
begindocument

[
begindrcases
g^l_ij = fracpartial epartial w^l_ij = dots\
w^l_ij = dots
enddrcases
qquad
begintabular@l
for $l=dots$\
for $i=dots$\
for $j=dots$
endtabular
]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

add a comment | 

3

Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
 left.beginaligned
 g_ij^i &=fracpartial epartial w_ij^I=A(I_i)delta^ell+1_j\
 w_ij^i &=w_ij^ell-r,g_ij^ell\ 
 endalignedright}qquad
 beginarrayl
 textfor $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,\
 textfor $i=0,1,2,dots N^ell+1$,\
 textfor $j=1,2,3,dots N^ell+1+2$
 endarray
endalign*
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

marmotmarmot

119k6154288

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...
  
  – Mico
  37 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommandpder[2]fracpartial #1partial #2

begindocument

[
left.
beginaligned
g_ij^l &= pderew_ij^l = mathcalA(I_i^l)delta_i^l+1
\[2ex]
w_ij^l &= w_ij^l-rg_ij^l
endaligned
right}
qquad
beginalignedat2
&textfor &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
&textfor & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^l+1,\
&textfor & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^l+1.
endalignedat
]
enddocument

The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.

share|improve this answer

answered 16 mins ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

Debotush Dam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485405%2fhow-to-write-this-math-term-with-cases-it-isnt-working%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'drcases' environment
begindocument

[
begindrcases
g^l_ij = fracpartial epartial w^l_ij = dots\
w^l_ij = dots
enddrcases
qquad
begintabular@l
for $l=dots$\
for $i=dots$\
for $j=dots$
endtabular
]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

add a comment | 

3

A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'drcases' environment
begindocument

[
begindrcases
g^l_ij = fracpartial epartial w^l_ij = dots\
w^l_ij = dots
enddrcases
qquad
begintabular@l
for $l=dots$\
for $i=dots$\
for $j=dots$
endtabular
]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

add a comment | 

A combination of a drcases environment (provided by the mathtools package and a plain tabular environment gets the job done:

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'drcases' environment
begindocument

[
begindrcases
g^l_ij = fracpartial epartial w^l_ij = dots\
w^l_ij = dots
enddrcases
qquad
begintabular@l
for $l=dots$\
for $i=dots$\
for $j=dots$
endtabular
]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'drcases' environment
begindocument

[
begindrcases
g^l_ij = fracpartial epartial w^l_ij = dots\
w^l_ij = dots
enddrcases
qquad
begintabular@l
for $l=dots$\
for $i=dots$\
for $j=dots$
endtabular
]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

answered 1 hour ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

answered 1 hour ago

MicoMico

287k32392781

3

Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
 left.beginaligned
 g_ij^i &=fracpartial epartial w_ij^I=A(I_i)delta^ell+1_j\
 w_ij^i &=w_ij^ell-r,g_ij^ell\ 
 endalignedright}qquad
 beginarrayl
 textfor $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,\
 textfor $i=0,1,2,dots N^ell+1$,\
 textfor $j=1,2,3,dots N^ell+1+2$
 endarray
endalign*
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

marmotmarmot

119k6154288

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...
  
  – Mico
  37 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
 left.beginaligned
 g_ij^i &=fracpartial epartial w_ij^I=A(I_i)delta^ell+1_j\
 w_ij^i &=w_ij^ell-r,g_ij^ell\ 
 endalignedright}qquad
 beginarrayl
 textfor $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,\
 textfor $i=0,1,2,dots N^ell+1$,\
 textfor $j=1,2,3,dots N^ell+1+2$
 endarray
endalign*
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

marmotmarmot

119k6154288

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1. :-) I think, though, that it's supposed to be w^l (or w^ell, if you prefer) rather than either w^I or w^i...
  
  – Mico
  37 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Similar to Mico's approach but with the equal sign aligned.

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
 left.beginaligned
 g_ij^i &=fracpartial epartial w_ij^I=A(I_i)delta^ell+1_j\
 w_ij^i &=w_ij^ell-r,g_ij^ell\ 
 endalignedright}qquad
 beginarrayl
 textfor $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,\
 textfor $i=0,1,2,dots N^ell+1$,\
 textfor $j=1,2,3,dots N^ell+1+2$
 endarray
endalign*
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

marmotmarmot

119k6154288

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
 left.beginaligned
 g_ij^i &=fracpartial epartial w_ij^I=A(I_i)delta^ell+1_j\
 w_ij^i &=w_ij^ell-r,g_ij^ell\ 
 endalignedright}qquad
 beginarrayl
 textfor $ell=1,2,3,dots L$,\
 textfor $i=0,1,2,dots N^ell+1$,\
 textfor $j=1,2,3,dots N^ell+1+2$
 endarray
endalign*
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

marmotmarmot

119k6154288

answered 1 hour ago

marmotmarmot

119k6154288

answered 1 hour ago

marmotmarmot

119k6154288

1

A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommandpder[2]fracpartial #1partial #2

begindocument

[
left.
beginaligned
g_ij^l &= pderew_ij^l = mathcalA(I_i^l)delta_i^l+1
\[2ex]
w_ij^l &= w_ij^l-rg_ij^l
endaligned
right}
qquad
beginalignedat2
&textfor &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
&textfor & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^l+1,\
&textfor & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^l+1.
endalignedat
]
enddocument

The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.

share|improve this answer

answered 16 mins ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

add a comment | 

1

A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommandpder[2]fracpartial #1partial #2

begindocument

[
left.
beginaligned
g_ij^l &= pderew_ij^l = mathcalA(I_i^l)delta_i^l+1
\[2ex]
w_ij^l &= w_ij^l-rg_ij^l
endaligned
right}
qquad
beginalignedat2
&textfor &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
&textfor & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^l+1,\
&textfor & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^l+1.
endalignedat
]
enddocument

The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.

share|improve this answer

answered 16 mins ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

add a comment | 

A combination of aligned and alignedat so all equals signs are aligned.

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommandpder[2]fracpartial #1partial #2

begindocument

[
left.
beginaligned
g_ij^l &= pderew_ij^l = mathcalA(I_i^l)delta_i^l+1
\[2ex]
w_ij^l &= w_ij^l-rg_ij^l
endaligned
right}
qquad
beginalignedat2
&textfor &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
&textfor & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^l+1,\
&textfor & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^l+1.
endalignedat
]
enddocument

The bottom equality in the left part is suspicious, check it.

share|improve this answer

answered 16 mins ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommandpder[2]fracpartial #1partial #2

begindocument

[
left.
beginaligned
g_ij^l &= pderew_ij^l = mathcalA(I_i^l)delta_i^l+1
\[2ex]
w_ij^l &= w_ij^l-rg_ij^l
endaligned
right}
qquad
beginalignedat2
&textfor &quad l &= 1,2,3,dots, L,\
&textfor & i &= 0,1,2,dots, N^l+1,\
&textfor & j &= 1,2,3,dots, N^l+1.
endalignedat
]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 16 mins ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

answered 16 mins ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257

answered 16 mins ago

egregegreg

735k8919343257