What is the lowest temperature possible (of water) to cook meat in? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat causes water to boil over?How do I control the temperature of water for an extended period of time?How should I control the time and temperature when baking two dishes?What is the lowest possible temperature for stewing meat?When is Slow Cooking done - time vs temperature of meatCan I boil water to temperature lower than 100 Celsius / 212 Fahrenheit to make a tea?Boiling Chicken Breast (or any meat) before cooking to cook evenlyWhat is the best way to cook chicken for enchiladas?Why cook stewing meat low and slow?Cooking beef goulash in a slow cooker with a temperature controller, what temperature?
Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Inversion Puzzle
Any good smartcontract for "business calendar" oracles?
What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?
Spanish for "widget"
Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning
What is a mixture ratio of propellant?
Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?
How come people say “Would of”?
Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol
What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Feasability of miniature nuclear reactors for humanoid cyborgs
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
Where to refill my bottle in India?
If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?
Why can Shazam do this?
What is this 4-propeller plane?
Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?
Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?
JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?
What is the lowest temperature possible (of water) to cook meat in?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat causes water to boil over?How do I control the temperature of water for an extended period of time?How should I control the time and temperature when baking two dishes?What is the lowest possible temperature for stewing meat?When is Slow Cooking done - time vs temperature of meatCan I boil water to temperature lower than 100 Celsius / 212 Fahrenheit to make a tea?Boiling Chicken Breast (or any meat) before cooking to cook evenlyWhat is the best way to cook chicken for enchiladas?Why cook stewing meat low and slow?Cooking beef goulash in a slow cooker with a temperature controller, what temperature?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Say I want to cook a piece of meat by putting it in water and bringing the water to a certain temperature. (In celsius please) how low can the temperature be for it to be still able to cook the meat? Does it need a boil, or can it be done with say 40 degrees celsius? And if so, how long does it need to be in the water for it to get done?
meat cooking-time boiling
add a comment |
Say I want to cook a piece of meat by putting it in water and bringing the water to a certain temperature. (In celsius please) how low can the temperature be for it to be still able to cook the meat? Does it need a boil, or can it be done with say 40 degrees celsius? And if so, how long does it need to be in the water for it to get done?
meat cooking-time boiling
add a comment |
Say I want to cook a piece of meat by putting it in water and bringing the water to a certain temperature. (In celsius please) how low can the temperature be for it to be still able to cook the meat? Does it need a boil, or can it be done with say 40 degrees celsius? And if so, how long does it need to be in the water for it to get done?
meat cooking-time boiling
Say I want to cook a piece of meat by putting it in water and bringing the water to a certain temperature. (In celsius please) how low can the temperature be for it to be still able to cook the meat? Does it need a boil, or can it be done with say 40 degrees celsius? And if so, how long does it need to be in the water for it to get done?
meat cooking-time boiling
meat cooking-time boiling
asked Feb 23 '16 at 22:06
NoralieNoralie
176117
176117
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The answer depends on the type of meat as well as the thickness. There are different things you need to worry about killing in different kinds of meat, and it takes a different amount of time for everything to get hot enough for long enough depending on the thickness.
Note that you generally don't want to put the meat straight in the water, since you'll lose flavor into the water (unless your goal is to make broth or soup); you'll want to put it in a sealed bag in the water. This method of cooking is called sous vide. (Yes, that means "under vacuum", but you don't actually need vacuum-sealed bags; airtight with most of the air removed will suffice.)
The best single resource I know for this is Douglas Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking". There are tables for fish/shellfish, poultry, and beef, pork and lamb, as well as a lot of other great information. To give you a rough idea, the temperatures in the tables go down to around 55C, and at that temperature, the times cover a huge range, from 2 hours for thin (5mm) beef, pork, or lamb, to 9.25 hours for thick (70mm) fatty fish.
That 55C is the lowest safe temperature I know of. The government-published pasteurization time tables don't go below that. It's possible lower temperatures can work too, but you'd have to start digging into published papers.
Note that there may also be thickness/size bounds. Those tables only go up to 70mm so that's all I'm confident about. It's possible you can go even thicker, but I don't think you can go on forever. Eventually things will be sufficiently thick that the amount of time spent at too-low temperature in the center of the meat before it's totally heated up can't be compensated for by time holding it at a higher temperature once it's fully heated. This would be especially true if you try to cook anything that's not totally solid, since there's more contamination on surfaces than inside meat. For example, cooking a whole chicken like this doesn't sound like a great idea.
Okay, add a tiny subquestion (and to say that this part is for a story I am writing, I am not actually going to do this myself) is it the same when the meat is still alive?
– Noralie
Feb 24 '16 at 11:06
@Noralie Honestly I have no idea. I think the issue would be more whether it's safe to cook the animal in question entirely whole (e.g. including the contents of its digestive system?) but that's not really my area of expertise.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 11:23
There is also the issue of how long will it take to cook through to the center? It may cause an unsafe condition to cook food to low in temp because the food may be in the hazardous zone for too long.
– Escoce
Feb 24 '16 at 17:04
3
@Escoce What I described in the answer is safe. As far as I understand, it does take time for the center to reach the same temperature as the water outside, but it's still safe - everything is held at the temperature sufficiently long to kill things. It's not as black and white as the usual safe cooking temperature plus danger zone, where the temperature is supposed to make things safes instantly, and too long at lower temperatures is bad; in this kind of situation, the extra time makes up for the lower temperature.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 17:27
1
Effectively, you're pasteurizing the meat at these temperatures. It might not meet all of the definitions of 'cook'. (sort of like how ceviche is 'cooked' in acid).
– Joe
Feb 24 '16 at 18:03
|
show 5 more comments
The primary concern here is cooking the food at a temperature that is above that of which bacteria can grow, and doing so for long enough to reduce the bacteria levels significantly (typically, at least a millionfold reduction in bacteria count).
From Doug Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking":
Most food pathogens stop growing by 122°F (50°C), but the common food pathogen Clostridium perfringens can grow at up to 126.1°F (52.3°C). So in sous vide cooking, you usually cook at 130°F (54.4°C) or higher. (You could cook your food at slightly lower temperatures, but it would take you a lot longer to kill the food pathogens.)
Thus, 55°C is a good baseline; 54°C might be okay (though Bacillus Cereus may grow a bit above that), but it would take a very long time at 54°C. Even 54.4°C takes a very long time:
in a 130°F (54.4°C) water bath (the lowest temperature I recommend for cooking sous vide) it’ll take you about 2½ hours to reduce E. coli to a safe level in a 1 inch (25 mm) thick hamburger patty and holding a hamburger patty at 130°F (54.4°C) for 2½ hours is inconceivable with traditional cooking methods – which is why the “danger zone” conceived for traditional cooking methods doesn’t start at 130°F (54.4°C).
At the more common 60°C, it takes much less time:
FSIS (2005) recommends a 6.5 decimal reduction of Salmonella in beef, so the coldest part should be at least 140°F (60°C) for at least 6.5D_60^6.0 = 35.6 minutes.
A common sense rule without having to look up your specific meat would be to cook to 60°C for an hour and a half; this covers you for all meat types and for up to 25mm thick pieces. Of course, if you prefer a lower temperature and/or thicker pieces of meat, look it up.
Note that it is possible to cook meat at a lower temperature; however, below 54.4°C it may not be pasteurized (meaning, the bacteria may not have been reduced to a safe level). Steaks are often cooked sous-vide at 50-52°C for those who enjoy bloody steaks, and when sourced from a reputable butcher, for example. However, in addition to being aware of the risks of doing so, it is important to ensure the meat is not cooked at that temperature for very long (more than about an hour), as it is actively encouraging bacterial growth.
Additionally, in responding to the comment on the other answer; as it would be inherently unethical to cook a living animal at these temperatures (which likely would eventually kill it, but would be incredibly cruel), I don't think there is an equivalent temperature guide. Certainly crab and lobster are commonly cooked by dropping a live animal into the boiling water; equally certainly, water slightly under boiling would still kill them, though at what point it becomes 'cruel' is up to the reader to determine (as many would argue that even boiling water is still cruel).
Also, most animals should not be cooked whole (without the guts/etc. removed); even aside from the issue of tissue density, the guts often contain pathogens.
add a comment |
I think u are looking for the same question I am. How long can u keep a body in a hottub at 104F before your muscles start cooking!
Live meat. 40C same thing.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "49"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66770%2fwhat-is-the-lowest-temperature-possible-of-water-to-cook-meat-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The answer depends on the type of meat as well as the thickness. There are different things you need to worry about killing in different kinds of meat, and it takes a different amount of time for everything to get hot enough for long enough depending on the thickness.
Note that you generally don't want to put the meat straight in the water, since you'll lose flavor into the water (unless your goal is to make broth or soup); you'll want to put it in a sealed bag in the water. This method of cooking is called sous vide. (Yes, that means "under vacuum", but you don't actually need vacuum-sealed bags; airtight with most of the air removed will suffice.)
The best single resource I know for this is Douglas Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking". There are tables for fish/shellfish, poultry, and beef, pork and lamb, as well as a lot of other great information. To give you a rough idea, the temperatures in the tables go down to around 55C, and at that temperature, the times cover a huge range, from 2 hours for thin (5mm) beef, pork, or lamb, to 9.25 hours for thick (70mm) fatty fish.
That 55C is the lowest safe temperature I know of. The government-published pasteurization time tables don't go below that. It's possible lower temperatures can work too, but you'd have to start digging into published papers.
Note that there may also be thickness/size bounds. Those tables only go up to 70mm so that's all I'm confident about. It's possible you can go even thicker, but I don't think you can go on forever. Eventually things will be sufficiently thick that the amount of time spent at too-low temperature in the center of the meat before it's totally heated up can't be compensated for by time holding it at a higher temperature once it's fully heated. This would be especially true if you try to cook anything that's not totally solid, since there's more contamination on surfaces than inside meat. For example, cooking a whole chicken like this doesn't sound like a great idea.
Okay, add a tiny subquestion (and to say that this part is for a story I am writing, I am not actually going to do this myself) is it the same when the meat is still alive?
– Noralie
Feb 24 '16 at 11:06
@Noralie Honestly I have no idea. I think the issue would be more whether it's safe to cook the animal in question entirely whole (e.g. including the contents of its digestive system?) but that's not really my area of expertise.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 11:23
There is also the issue of how long will it take to cook through to the center? It may cause an unsafe condition to cook food to low in temp because the food may be in the hazardous zone for too long.
– Escoce
Feb 24 '16 at 17:04
3
@Escoce What I described in the answer is safe. As far as I understand, it does take time for the center to reach the same temperature as the water outside, but it's still safe - everything is held at the temperature sufficiently long to kill things. It's not as black and white as the usual safe cooking temperature plus danger zone, where the temperature is supposed to make things safes instantly, and too long at lower temperatures is bad; in this kind of situation, the extra time makes up for the lower temperature.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 17:27
1
Effectively, you're pasteurizing the meat at these temperatures. It might not meet all of the definitions of 'cook'. (sort of like how ceviche is 'cooked' in acid).
– Joe
Feb 24 '16 at 18:03
|
show 5 more comments
The answer depends on the type of meat as well as the thickness. There are different things you need to worry about killing in different kinds of meat, and it takes a different amount of time for everything to get hot enough for long enough depending on the thickness.
Note that you generally don't want to put the meat straight in the water, since you'll lose flavor into the water (unless your goal is to make broth or soup); you'll want to put it in a sealed bag in the water. This method of cooking is called sous vide. (Yes, that means "under vacuum", but you don't actually need vacuum-sealed bags; airtight with most of the air removed will suffice.)
The best single resource I know for this is Douglas Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking". There are tables for fish/shellfish, poultry, and beef, pork and lamb, as well as a lot of other great information. To give you a rough idea, the temperatures in the tables go down to around 55C, and at that temperature, the times cover a huge range, from 2 hours for thin (5mm) beef, pork, or lamb, to 9.25 hours for thick (70mm) fatty fish.
That 55C is the lowest safe temperature I know of. The government-published pasteurization time tables don't go below that. It's possible lower temperatures can work too, but you'd have to start digging into published papers.
Note that there may also be thickness/size bounds. Those tables only go up to 70mm so that's all I'm confident about. It's possible you can go even thicker, but I don't think you can go on forever. Eventually things will be sufficiently thick that the amount of time spent at too-low temperature in the center of the meat before it's totally heated up can't be compensated for by time holding it at a higher temperature once it's fully heated. This would be especially true if you try to cook anything that's not totally solid, since there's more contamination on surfaces than inside meat. For example, cooking a whole chicken like this doesn't sound like a great idea.
Okay, add a tiny subquestion (and to say that this part is for a story I am writing, I am not actually going to do this myself) is it the same when the meat is still alive?
– Noralie
Feb 24 '16 at 11:06
@Noralie Honestly I have no idea. I think the issue would be more whether it's safe to cook the animal in question entirely whole (e.g. including the contents of its digestive system?) but that's not really my area of expertise.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 11:23
There is also the issue of how long will it take to cook through to the center? It may cause an unsafe condition to cook food to low in temp because the food may be in the hazardous zone for too long.
– Escoce
Feb 24 '16 at 17:04
3
@Escoce What I described in the answer is safe. As far as I understand, it does take time for the center to reach the same temperature as the water outside, but it's still safe - everything is held at the temperature sufficiently long to kill things. It's not as black and white as the usual safe cooking temperature plus danger zone, where the temperature is supposed to make things safes instantly, and too long at lower temperatures is bad; in this kind of situation, the extra time makes up for the lower temperature.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 17:27
1
Effectively, you're pasteurizing the meat at these temperatures. It might not meet all of the definitions of 'cook'. (sort of like how ceviche is 'cooked' in acid).
– Joe
Feb 24 '16 at 18:03
|
show 5 more comments
The answer depends on the type of meat as well as the thickness. There are different things you need to worry about killing in different kinds of meat, and it takes a different amount of time for everything to get hot enough for long enough depending on the thickness.
Note that you generally don't want to put the meat straight in the water, since you'll lose flavor into the water (unless your goal is to make broth or soup); you'll want to put it in a sealed bag in the water. This method of cooking is called sous vide. (Yes, that means "under vacuum", but you don't actually need vacuum-sealed bags; airtight with most of the air removed will suffice.)
The best single resource I know for this is Douglas Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking". There are tables for fish/shellfish, poultry, and beef, pork and lamb, as well as a lot of other great information. To give you a rough idea, the temperatures in the tables go down to around 55C, and at that temperature, the times cover a huge range, from 2 hours for thin (5mm) beef, pork, or lamb, to 9.25 hours for thick (70mm) fatty fish.
That 55C is the lowest safe temperature I know of. The government-published pasteurization time tables don't go below that. It's possible lower temperatures can work too, but you'd have to start digging into published papers.
Note that there may also be thickness/size bounds. Those tables only go up to 70mm so that's all I'm confident about. It's possible you can go even thicker, but I don't think you can go on forever. Eventually things will be sufficiently thick that the amount of time spent at too-low temperature in the center of the meat before it's totally heated up can't be compensated for by time holding it at a higher temperature once it's fully heated. This would be especially true if you try to cook anything that's not totally solid, since there's more contamination on surfaces than inside meat. For example, cooking a whole chicken like this doesn't sound like a great idea.
The answer depends on the type of meat as well as the thickness. There are different things you need to worry about killing in different kinds of meat, and it takes a different amount of time for everything to get hot enough for long enough depending on the thickness.
Note that you generally don't want to put the meat straight in the water, since you'll lose flavor into the water (unless your goal is to make broth or soup); you'll want to put it in a sealed bag in the water. This method of cooking is called sous vide. (Yes, that means "under vacuum", but you don't actually need vacuum-sealed bags; airtight with most of the air removed will suffice.)
The best single resource I know for this is Douglas Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking". There are tables for fish/shellfish, poultry, and beef, pork and lamb, as well as a lot of other great information. To give you a rough idea, the temperatures in the tables go down to around 55C, and at that temperature, the times cover a huge range, from 2 hours for thin (5mm) beef, pork, or lamb, to 9.25 hours for thick (70mm) fatty fish.
That 55C is the lowest safe temperature I know of. The government-published pasteurization time tables don't go below that. It's possible lower temperatures can work too, but you'd have to start digging into published papers.
Note that there may also be thickness/size bounds. Those tables only go up to 70mm so that's all I'm confident about. It's possible you can go even thicker, but I don't think you can go on forever. Eventually things will be sufficiently thick that the amount of time spent at too-low temperature in the center of the meat before it's totally heated up can't be compensated for by time holding it at a higher temperature once it's fully heated. This would be especially true if you try to cook anything that's not totally solid, since there's more contamination on surfaces than inside meat. For example, cooking a whole chicken like this doesn't sound like a great idea.
edited Feb 25 '16 at 13:02
answered Feb 23 '16 at 22:13
Cascabel♦Cascabel
52.8k16148268
52.8k16148268
Okay, add a tiny subquestion (and to say that this part is for a story I am writing, I am not actually going to do this myself) is it the same when the meat is still alive?
– Noralie
Feb 24 '16 at 11:06
@Noralie Honestly I have no idea. I think the issue would be more whether it's safe to cook the animal in question entirely whole (e.g. including the contents of its digestive system?) but that's not really my area of expertise.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 11:23
There is also the issue of how long will it take to cook through to the center? It may cause an unsafe condition to cook food to low in temp because the food may be in the hazardous zone for too long.
– Escoce
Feb 24 '16 at 17:04
3
@Escoce What I described in the answer is safe. As far as I understand, it does take time for the center to reach the same temperature as the water outside, but it's still safe - everything is held at the temperature sufficiently long to kill things. It's not as black and white as the usual safe cooking temperature plus danger zone, where the temperature is supposed to make things safes instantly, and too long at lower temperatures is bad; in this kind of situation, the extra time makes up for the lower temperature.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 17:27
1
Effectively, you're pasteurizing the meat at these temperatures. It might not meet all of the definitions of 'cook'. (sort of like how ceviche is 'cooked' in acid).
– Joe
Feb 24 '16 at 18:03
|
show 5 more comments
Okay, add a tiny subquestion (and to say that this part is for a story I am writing, I am not actually going to do this myself) is it the same when the meat is still alive?
– Noralie
Feb 24 '16 at 11:06
@Noralie Honestly I have no idea. I think the issue would be more whether it's safe to cook the animal in question entirely whole (e.g. including the contents of its digestive system?) but that's not really my area of expertise.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 11:23
There is also the issue of how long will it take to cook through to the center? It may cause an unsafe condition to cook food to low in temp because the food may be in the hazardous zone for too long.
– Escoce
Feb 24 '16 at 17:04
3
@Escoce What I described in the answer is safe. As far as I understand, it does take time for the center to reach the same temperature as the water outside, but it's still safe - everything is held at the temperature sufficiently long to kill things. It's not as black and white as the usual safe cooking temperature plus danger zone, where the temperature is supposed to make things safes instantly, and too long at lower temperatures is bad; in this kind of situation, the extra time makes up for the lower temperature.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 17:27
1
Effectively, you're pasteurizing the meat at these temperatures. It might not meet all of the definitions of 'cook'. (sort of like how ceviche is 'cooked' in acid).
– Joe
Feb 24 '16 at 18:03
Okay, add a tiny subquestion (and to say that this part is for a story I am writing, I am not actually going to do this myself) is it the same when the meat is still alive?
– Noralie
Feb 24 '16 at 11:06
Okay, add a tiny subquestion (and to say that this part is for a story I am writing, I am not actually going to do this myself) is it the same when the meat is still alive?
– Noralie
Feb 24 '16 at 11:06
@Noralie Honestly I have no idea. I think the issue would be more whether it's safe to cook the animal in question entirely whole (e.g. including the contents of its digestive system?) but that's not really my area of expertise.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 11:23
@Noralie Honestly I have no idea. I think the issue would be more whether it's safe to cook the animal in question entirely whole (e.g. including the contents of its digestive system?) but that's not really my area of expertise.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 11:23
There is also the issue of how long will it take to cook through to the center? It may cause an unsafe condition to cook food to low in temp because the food may be in the hazardous zone for too long.
– Escoce
Feb 24 '16 at 17:04
There is also the issue of how long will it take to cook through to the center? It may cause an unsafe condition to cook food to low in temp because the food may be in the hazardous zone for too long.
– Escoce
Feb 24 '16 at 17:04
3
3
@Escoce What I described in the answer is safe. As far as I understand, it does take time for the center to reach the same temperature as the water outside, but it's still safe - everything is held at the temperature sufficiently long to kill things. It's not as black and white as the usual safe cooking temperature plus danger zone, where the temperature is supposed to make things safes instantly, and too long at lower temperatures is bad; in this kind of situation, the extra time makes up for the lower temperature.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 17:27
@Escoce What I described in the answer is safe. As far as I understand, it does take time for the center to reach the same temperature as the water outside, but it's still safe - everything is held at the temperature sufficiently long to kill things. It's not as black and white as the usual safe cooking temperature plus danger zone, where the temperature is supposed to make things safes instantly, and too long at lower temperatures is bad; in this kind of situation, the extra time makes up for the lower temperature.
– Cascabel♦
Feb 24 '16 at 17:27
1
1
Effectively, you're pasteurizing the meat at these temperatures. It might not meet all of the definitions of 'cook'. (sort of like how ceviche is 'cooked' in acid).
– Joe
Feb 24 '16 at 18:03
Effectively, you're pasteurizing the meat at these temperatures. It might not meet all of the definitions of 'cook'. (sort of like how ceviche is 'cooked' in acid).
– Joe
Feb 24 '16 at 18:03
|
show 5 more comments
The primary concern here is cooking the food at a temperature that is above that of which bacteria can grow, and doing so for long enough to reduce the bacteria levels significantly (typically, at least a millionfold reduction in bacteria count).
From Doug Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking":
Most food pathogens stop growing by 122°F (50°C), but the common food pathogen Clostridium perfringens can grow at up to 126.1°F (52.3°C). So in sous vide cooking, you usually cook at 130°F (54.4°C) or higher. (You could cook your food at slightly lower temperatures, but it would take you a lot longer to kill the food pathogens.)
Thus, 55°C is a good baseline; 54°C might be okay (though Bacillus Cereus may grow a bit above that), but it would take a very long time at 54°C. Even 54.4°C takes a very long time:
in a 130°F (54.4°C) water bath (the lowest temperature I recommend for cooking sous vide) it’ll take you about 2½ hours to reduce E. coli to a safe level in a 1 inch (25 mm) thick hamburger patty and holding a hamburger patty at 130°F (54.4°C) for 2½ hours is inconceivable with traditional cooking methods – which is why the “danger zone” conceived for traditional cooking methods doesn’t start at 130°F (54.4°C).
At the more common 60°C, it takes much less time:
FSIS (2005) recommends a 6.5 decimal reduction of Salmonella in beef, so the coldest part should be at least 140°F (60°C) for at least 6.5D_60^6.0 = 35.6 minutes.
A common sense rule without having to look up your specific meat would be to cook to 60°C for an hour and a half; this covers you for all meat types and for up to 25mm thick pieces. Of course, if you prefer a lower temperature and/or thicker pieces of meat, look it up.
Note that it is possible to cook meat at a lower temperature; however, below 54.4°C it may not be pasteurized (meaning, the bacteria may not have been reduced to a safe level). Steaks are often cooked sous-vide at 50-52°C for those who enjoy bloody steaks, and when sourced from a reputable butcher, for example. However, in addition to being aware of the risks of doing so, it is important to ensure the meat is not cooked at that temperature for very long (more than about an hour), as it is actively encouraging bacterial growth.
Additionally, in responding to the comment on the other answer; as it would be inherently unethical to cook a living animal at these temperatures (which likely would eventually kill it, but would be incredibly cruel), I don't think there is an equivalent temperature guide. Certainly crab and lobster are commonly cooked by dropping a live animal into the boiling water; equally certainly, water slightly under boiling would still kill them, though at what point it becomes 'cruel' is up to the reader to determine (as many would argue that even boiling water is still cruel).
Also, most animals should not be cooked whole (without the guts/etc. removed); even aside from the issue of tissue density, the guts often contain pathogens.
add a comment |
The primary concern here is cooking the food at a temperature that is above that of which bacteria can grow, and doing so for long enough to reduce the bacteria levels significantly (typically, at least a millionfold reduction in bacteria count).
From Doug Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking":
Most food pathogens stop growing by 122°F (50°C), but the common food pathogen Clostridium perfringens can grow at up to 126.1°F (52.3°C). So in sous vide cooking, you usually cook at 130°F (54.4°C) or higher. (You could cook your food at slightly lower temperatures, but it would take you a lot longer to kill the food pathogens.)
Thus, 55°C is a good baseline; 54°C might be okay (though Bacillus Cereus may grow a bit above that), but it would take a very long time at 54°C. Even 54.4°C takes a very long time:
in a 130°F (54.4°C) water bath (the lowest temperature I recommend for cooking sous vide) it’ll take you about 2½ hours to reduce E. coli to a safe level in a 1 inch (25 mm) thick hamburger patty and holding a hamburger patty at 130°F (54.4°C) for 2½ hours is inconceivable with traditional cooking methods – which is why the “danger zone” conceived for traditional cooking methods doesn’t start at 130°F (54.4°C).
At the more common 60°C, it takes much less time:
FSIS (2005) recommends a 6.5 decimal reduction of Salmonella in beef, so the coldest part should be at least 140°F (60°C) for at least 6.5D_60^6.0 = 35.6 minutes.
A common sense rule without having to look up your specific meat would be to cook to 60°C for an hour and a half; this covers you for all meat types and for up to 25mm thick pieces. Of course, if you prefer a lower temperature and/or thicker pieces of meat, look it up.
Note that it is possible to cook meat at a lower temperature; however, below 54.4°C it may not be pasteurized (meaning, the bacteria may not have been reduced to a safe level). Steaks are often cooked sous-vide at 50-52°C for those who enjoy bloody steaks, and when sourced from a reputable butcher, for example. However, in addition to being aware of the risks of doing so, it is important to ensure the meat is not cooked at that temperature for very long (more than about an hour), as it is actively encouraging bacterial growth.
Additionally, in responding to the comment on the other answer; as it would be inherently unethical to cook a living animal at these temperatures (which likely would eventually kill it, but would be incredibly cruel), I don't think there is an equivalent temperature guide. Certainly crab and lobster are commonly cooked by dropping a live animal into the boiling water; equally certainly, water slightly under boiling would still kill them, though at what point it becomes 'cruel' is up to the reader to determine (as many would argue that even boiling water is still cruel).
Also, most animals should not be cooked whole (without the guts/etc. removed); even aside from the issue of tissue density, the guts often contain pathogens.
add a comment |
The primary concern here is cooking the food at a temperature that is above that of which bacteria can grow, and doing so for long enough to reduce the bacteria levels significantly (typically, at least a millionfold reduction in bacteria count).
From Doug Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking":
Most food pathogens stop growing by 122°F (50°C), but the common food pathogen Clostridium perfringens can grow at up to 126.1°F (52.3°C). So in sous vide cooking, you usually cook at 130°F (54.4°C) or higher. (You could cook your food at slightly lower temperatures, but it would take you a lot longer to kill the food pathogens.)
Thus, 55°C is a good baseline; 54°C might be okay (though Bacillus Cereus may grow a bit above that), but it would take a very long time at 54°C. Even 54.4°C takes a very long time:
in a 130°F (54.4°C) water bath (the lowest temperature I recommend for cooking sous vide) it’ll take you about 2½ hours to reduce E. coli to a safe level in a 1 inch (25 mm) thick hamburger patty and holding a hamburger patty at 130°F (54.4°C) for 2½ hours is inconceivable with traditional cooking methods – which is why the “danger zone” conceived for traditional cooking methods doesn’t start at 130°F (54.4°C).
At the more common 60°C, it takes much less time:
FSIS (2005) recommends a 6.5 decimal reduction of Salmonella in beef, so the coldest part should be at least 140°F (60°C) for at least 6.5D_60^6.0 = 35.6 minutes.
A common sense rule without having to look up your specific meat would be to cook to 60°C for an hour and a half; this covers you for all meat types and for up to 25mm thick pieces. Of course, if you prefer a lower temperature and/or thicker pieces of meat, look it up.
Note that it is possible to cook meat at a lower temperature; however, below 54.4°C it may not be pasteurized (meaning, the bacteria may not have been reduced to a safe level). Steaks are often cooked sous-vide at 50-52°C for those who enjoy bloody steaks, and when sourced from a reputable butcher, for example. However, in addition to being aware of the risks of doing so, it is important to ensure the meat is not cooked at that temperature for very long (more than about an hour), as it is actively encouraging bacterial growth.
Additionally, in responding to the comment on the other answer; as it would be inherently unethical to cook a living animal at these temperatures (which likely would eventually kill it, but would be incredibly cruel), I don't think there is an equivalent temperature guide. Certainly crab and lobster are commonly cooked by dropping a live animal into the boiling water; equally certainly, water slightly under boiling would still kill them, though at what point it becomes 'cruel' is up to the reader to determine (as many would argue that even boiling water is still cruel).
Also, most animals should not be cooked whole (without the guts/etc. removed); even aside from the issue of tissue density, the guts often contain pathogens.
The primary concern here is cooking the food at a temperature that is above that of which bacteria can grow, and doing so for long enough to reduce the bacteria levels significantly (typically, at least a millionfold reduction in bacteria count).
From Doug Baldwin's "A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking":
Most food pathogens stop growing by 122°F (50°C), but the common food pathogen Clostridium perfringens can grow at up to 126.1°F (52.3°C). So in sous vide cooking, you usually cook at 130°F (54.4°C) or higher. (You could cook your food at slightly lower temperatures, but it would take you a lot longer to kill the food pathogens.)
Thus, 55°C is a good baseline; 54°C might be okay (though Bacillus Cereus may grow a bit above that), but it would take a very long time at 54°C. Even 54.4°C takes a very long time:
in a 130°F (54.4°C) water bath (the lowest temperature I recommend for cooking sous vide) it’ll take you about 2½ hours to reduce E. coli to a safe level in a 1 inch (25 mm) thick hamburger patty and holding a hamburger patty at 130°F (54.4°C) for 2½ hours is inconceivable with traditional cooking methods – which is why the “danger zone” conceived for traditional cooking methods doesn’t start at 130°F (54.4°C).
At the more common 60°C, it takes much less time:
FSIS (2005) recommends a 6.5 decimal reduction of Salmonella in beef, so the coldest part should be at least 140°F (60°C) for at least 6.5D_60^6.0 = 35.6 minutes.
A common sense rule without having to look up your specific meat would be to cook to 60°C for an hour and a half; this covers you for all meat types and for up to 25mm thick pieces. Of course, if you prefer a lower temperature and/or thicker pieces of meat, look it up.
Note that it is possible to cook meat at a lower temperature; however, below 54.4°C it may not be pasteurized (meaning, the bacteria may not have been reduced to a safe level). Steaks are often cooked sous-vide at 50-52°C for those who enjoy bloody steaks, and when sourced from a reputable butcher, for example. However, in addition to being aware of the risks of doing so, it is important to ensure the meat is not cooked at that temperature for very long (more than about an hour), as it is actively encouraging bacterial growth.
Additionally, in responding to the comment on the other answer; as it would be inherently unethical to cook a living animal at these temperatures (which likely would eventually kill it, but would be incredibly cruel), I don't think there is an equivalent temperature guide. Certainly crab and lobster are commonly cooked by dropping a live animal into the boiling water; equally certainly, water slightly under boiling would still kill them, though at what point it becomes 'cruel' is up to the reader to determine (as many would argue that even boiling water is still cruel).
Also, most animals should not be cooked whole (without the guts/etc. removed); even aside from the issue of tissue density, the guts often contain pathogens.
edited Feb 24 '16 at 21:01
answered Feb 24 '16 at 20:40
Joe MJoe M
3,14011423
3,14011423
add a comment |
add a comment |
I think u are looking for the same question I am. How long can u keep a body in a hottub at 104F before your muscles start cooking!
Live meat. 40C same thing.
New contributor
add a comment |
I think u are looking for the same question I am. How long can u keep a body in a hottub at 104F before your muscles start cooking!
Live meat. 40C same thing.
New contributor
add a comment |
I think u are looking for the same question I am. How long can u keep a body in a hottub at 104F before your muscles start cooking!
Live meat. 40C same thing.
New contributor
I think u are looking for the same question I am. How long can u keep a body in a hottub at 104F before your muscles start cooking!
Live meat. 40C same thing.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 mins ago
LorraineLorraine
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Seasoned Advice!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66770%2fwhat-is-the-lowest-temperature-possible-of-water-to-cook-meat-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown