Why does the integral domain “being trapped between a finite field extension” implies that it is a field?Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a fieldLinear map $f:Vrightarrow V$ injective $Longleftrightarrow$ surjectiveDoes this morphism necessarily give rise to a finite extension of residue fields?Points lying over a closed point in a separable extension of the base field are rationnalWhat kind of points are there in a finite type $k$-scheme?Quotient of ring is flat gives an identity of idealsWhen is the tensor product of a separable field extension with itself a domain?Why is the residue field of a $k$-scheme an extension of $k$?An example of normalization of schemeFinite fiber property and integral extension.Characterize integral extension of rings by maximal idealsMaximal ideal of $K[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ such that the quotient field equals to $K$

What is the gram­mat­i­cal term for “‑ed” words like these?

MAXDOP Settings for SQL Server 2014

Why do IPv6 unique local addresses have to have a /48 prefix?

Can I rely on this github repository files?

Proof of Lemma: Every nonzero integer can be written as a product of primes

Is there a word to describe the feeling of being transfixed out of horror?

Drawing a topological "handle" with Tikz

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

How do I extrude a face to a single vertex

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th century?

What does this horizontal bar at the first measure mean?

Transformation of random variables and joint distributions

Find last 3 digits of this monster number

Is XSS in canonical link possible?

Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents

Can someone explain how this makes sense electrically?

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?

Does having a TSA Pre-Check member in your flight reservation increase the chances that everyone gets Pre-Check?

Will adding a BY-SA image to a blog post make the entire post BY-SA?

Freedom of speech and where it applies

How do I implement a file system driver driver in Linux?

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Varistor? Purpose and principle

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?



Why does the integral domain “being trapped between a finite field extension” implies that it is a field?


Proof that an integral domain that is a finite-dimensional $F$-vector space is in fact a fieldLinear map $f:Vrightarrow V$ injective $Longleftrightarrow$ surjectiveDoes this morphism necessarily give rise to a finite extension of residue fields?Points lying over a closed point in a separable extension of the base field are rationnalWhat kind of points are there in a finite type $k$-scheme?Quotient of ring is flat gives an identity of idealsWhen is the tensor product of a separable field extension with itself a domain?Why is the residue field of a $k$-scheme an extension of $k$?An example of normalization of schemeFinite fiber property and integral extension.Characterize integral extension of rings by maximal idealsMaximal ideal of $K[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ such that the quotient field equals to $K$













3












$begingroup$


The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.




Exercise 1.2.



Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.




The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.




Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatornameSpec B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatornameSpec(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^−1(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ−1(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.




In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This is close to being a duplicate of this old thread. But, it is not clear cut, so I won't use my dupehammer privilege to force my opinion.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    4 mins ago















3












$begingroup$


The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.




Exercise 1.2.



Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.




The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.




Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatornameSpec B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatornameSpec(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^−1(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ−1(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.




In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This is close to being a duplicate of this old thread. But, it is not clear cut, so I won't use my dupehammer privilege to force my opinion.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    4 mins ago













3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.




Exercise 1.2.



Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.




The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.




Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatornameSpec B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatornameSpec(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^−1(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ−1(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.




In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.




Exercise 1.2.



Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.




The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.




Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatornameSpec B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatornameSpec(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^−1(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ−1(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.




In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?







abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









zxcvzxcv

1659




1659











  • $begingroup$
    This is close to being a duplicate of this old thread. But, it is not clear cut, so I won't use my dupehammer privilege to force my opinion.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    4 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This is close to being a duplicate of this old thread. But, it is not clear cut, so I won't use my dupehammer privilege to force my opinion.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    4 mins ago















$begingroup$
This is close to being a duplicate of this old thread. But, it is not clear cut, so I won't use my dupehammer privilege to force my opinion.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
4 mins ago




$begingroup$
This is close to being a duplicate of this old thread. But, it is not clear cut, so I won't use my dupehammer privilege to force my opinion.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
4 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$


Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



    $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



    since



    $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



    every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



    $0 ne d in D tag 3$



    satisfies some



    $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



    that is,



    $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



    we may write



    $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



    then



    $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



    furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



    $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



    if not, then



    $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



    thus



    $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



    and via (4) this forces



    $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



    since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



    $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



    of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



    $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



    or



    $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



    which shows that



    $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



    since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161381%2fwhy-does-the-integral-domain-being-trapped-between-a-finite-field-extension-im%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$


      Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




      Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



      Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



      We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



      In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        4












        $begingroup$


        Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




        Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



        Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



        We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



        In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$


          Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




          Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



          Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



          We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



          In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




          Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



          Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



          We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



          In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          darij grinbergdarij grinberg

          11.3k33167




          11.3k33167





















              2












              $begingroup$

              Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



              $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



              since



              $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



              every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



              $0 ne d in D tag 3$



              satisfies some



              $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



              that is,



              $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



              we may write



              $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



              then



              $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



              furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



              $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



              if not, then



              $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



              thus



              $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



              and via (4) this forces



              $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



              since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



              $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



              of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



              $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



              or



              $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



              which shows that



              $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



              since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



                $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



                since



                $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



                every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



                $0 ne d in D tag 3$



                satisfies some



                $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



                that is,



                $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



                we may write



                $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



                then



                $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



                furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



                $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



                if not, then



                $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



                thus



                $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



                and via (4) this forces



                $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



                since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



                $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



                of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



                $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



                or



                $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



                which shows that



                $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



                since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



                  $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



                  since



                  $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



                  every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



                  $0 ne d in D tag 3$



                  satisfies some



                  $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



                  that is,



                  $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



                  we may write



                  $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



                  then



                  $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



                  furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



                  $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



                  if not, then



                  $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



                  thus



                  $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



                  and via (4) this forces



                  $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



                  since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



                  $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



                  of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



                  $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



                  or



                  $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



                  which shows that



                  $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



                  since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



                  $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



                  since



                  $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



                  every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



                  $0 ne d in D tag 3$



                  satisfies some



                  $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



                  that is,



                  $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



                  we may write



                  $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



                  then



                  $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



                  furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



                  $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



                  if not, then



                  $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



                  thus



                  $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



                  and via (4) this forces



                  $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



                  since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



                  $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



                  of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



                  $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



                  or



                  $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



                  which shows that



                  $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



                  since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 25 mins ago

























                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Robert LewisRobert Lewis

                  48.3k23167




                  48.3k23167



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161381%2fwhy-does-the-integral-domain-being-trapped-between-a-finite-field-extension-im%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

                      Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

                      Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager