Lowest total scrabble scoreCraft the longest Scrabble sentenceScrabble ImpossibilitiesHighest possible score my friend could earn in one Scrabble turn?What is the longest word that can be made out of all the scrabble tiles?What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile

Add big quotation marks inside my colorbox

What is Cash Advance APR?

How could a planet have erratic days?

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?

Why is short-wave infrared portion of electromagnetic spectrum so sensitive to fire?

Recommended PCB layout understanding - ADM2572 datasheet

Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?

Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

How can mimic phobia be cured?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos' actions in Infinity War

Why does a simple loop result in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

How can I write humor as character trait?

What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?

Unexpected behavior of the procedure `Area` on the object 'Polygon'

What is going on with 'gets(stdin)' on the site coderbyte?

Multiplicative persistence

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Terse Method to Swap Lowest for Highest?

User Story breakdown - Technical Task + User Feature

How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?



Lowest total scrabble score


Craft the longest Scrabble sentenceScrabble ImpossibilitiesHighest possible score my friend could earn in one Scrabble turn?What is the longest word that can be made out of all the scrabble tiles?What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile













11












$begingroup$


It's generally easier to get a low score in Scrabble than a high one. But is it easier to get a really low score?



Suppose you play a game of Scrabble by yourself in which you only make legal plays (that is, they'd withstand a challenge). You eventually play all of the tiles.



The order of play is important - if you make two words, you count them both. If you play on a double word score, the word that you formed is doubled (so you might want to start by playing a short word). Also remember that if you play all 7 tiles in your hand you get 50 points, so don't do that.



A lower bound on the score is 187. This is obviously not possible, as you're going to have to overlap words a fair bit. What is the lowest possible score you can get?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I added italics because I think that having to play all tiles is the most important constraint in the problem. Also, (to attempting solvers) I have an idea that it would be best to play very long words, so that overlapping is minimal. Also also, overlapping should probably be done with 1-point letters if possible (all while avoiding extra-point squares).
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    5 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Here's a link to a 1981 paper outlining the lowest possible scoring Scrabble games. No formal proof is given for their final answer, but it might be a good starting point.
    $endgroup$
    – DqwertyC
    4 hours ago















11












$begingroup$


It's generally easier to get a low score in Scrabble than a high one. But is it easier to get a really low score?



Suppose you play a game of Scrabble by yourself in which you only make legal plays (that is, they'd withstand a challenge). You eventually play all of the tiles.



The order of play is important - if you make two words, you count them both. If you play on a double word score, the word that you formed is doubled (so you might want to start by playing a short word). Also remember that if you play all 7 tiles in your hand you get 50 points, so don't do that.



A lower bound on the score is 187. This is obviously not possible, as you're going to have to overlap words a fair bit. What is the lowest possible score you can get?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I added italics because I think that having to play all tiles is the most important constraint in the problem. Also, (to attempting solvers) I have an idea that it would be best to play very long words, so that overlapping is minimal. Also also, overlapping should probably be done with 1-point letters if possible (all while avoiding extra-point squares).
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    5 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Here's a link to a 1981 paper outlining the lowest possible scoring Scrabble games. No formal proof is given for their final answer, but it might be a good starting point.
    $endgroup$
    – DqwertyC
    4 hours ago













11












11








11





$begingroup$


It's generally easier to get a low score in Scrabble than a high one. But is it easier to get a really low score?



Suppose you play a game of Scrabble by yourself in which you only make legal plays (that is, they'd withstand a challenge). You eventually play all of the tiles.



The order of play is important - if you make two words, you count them both. If you play on a double word score, the word that you formed is doubled (so you might want to start by playing a short word). Also remember that if you play all 7 tiles in your hand you get 50 points, so don't do that.



A lower bound on the score is 187. This is obviously not possible, as you're going to have to overlap words a fair bit. What is the lowest possible score you can get?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




It's generally easier to get a low score in Scrabble than a high one. But is it easier to get a really low score?



Suppose you play a game of Scrabble by yourself in which you only make legal plays (that is, they'd withstand a challenge). You eventually play all of the tiles.



The order of play is important - if you make two words, you count them both. If you play on a double word score, the word that you formed is doubled (so you might want to start by playing a short word). Also remember that if you play all 7 tiles in your hand you get 50 points, so don't do that.



A lower bound on the score is 187. This is obviously not possible, as you're going to have to overlap words a fair bit. What is the lowest possible score you can get?







scrabble






share|improve this question









New contributor




Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago







Spitemaster













New contributor




Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









SpitemasterSpitemaster

1564




1564




New contributor




Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Spitemaster is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    I added italics because I think that having to play all tiles is the most important constraint in the problem. Also, (to attempting solvers) I have an idea that it would be best to play very long words, so that overlapping is minimal. Also also, overlapping should probably be done with 1-point letters if possible (all while avoiding extra-point squares).
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    5 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Here's a link to a 1981 paper outlining the lowest possible scoring Scrabble games. No formal proof is given for their final answer, but it might be a good starting point.
    $endgroup$
    – DqwertyC
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I added italics because I think that having to play all tiles is the most important constraint in the problem. Also, (to attempting solvers) I have an idea that it would be best to play very long words, so that overlapping is minimal. Also also, overlapping should probably be done with 1-point letters if possible (all while avoiding extra-point squares).
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    5 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Here's a link to a 1981 paper outlining the lowest possible scoring Scrabble games. No formal proof is given for their final answer, but it might be a good starting point.
    $endgroup$
    – DqwertyC
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
I added italics because I think that having to play all tiles is the most important constraint in the problem. Also, (to attempting solvers) I have an idea that it would be best to play very long words, so that overlapping is minimal. Also also, overlapping should probably be done with 1-point letters if possible (all while avoiding extra-point squares).
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
5 hours ago





$begingroup$
I added italics because I think that having to play all tiles is the most important constraint in the problem. Also, (to attempting solvers) I have an idea that it would be best to play very long words, so that overlapping is minimal. Also also, overlapping should probably be done with 1-point letters if possible (all while avoiding extra-point squares).
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
5 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
Here's a link to a 1981 paper outlining the lowest possible scoring Scrabble games. No formal proof is given for their final answer, but it might be a good starting point.
$endgroup$
– DqwertyC
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Here's a link to a 1981 paper outlining the lowest possible scoring Scrabble games. No formal proof is given for their final answer, but it might be a good starting point.
$endgroup$
– DqwertyC
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

I've managed a score of $225$. I'm sure a better score is possible, since there were a few places where I was not optimal.



It's impossible to avoid all the "special" squares on the board, so I chose only to hit a few of the Double Letter squares, which are no more penalizing than creating an extra join between words (i.e. it's probably more beneficial to cross a few Double Word squares and get a lot of longer words than it is to squeeze my way in between the "special" square using 3-letter words).



I started out using both blanks to negate the automatic Double Word that occurs on the starting square.



Here is the final board:
enter image description here



And here is the sequence of moves (they could go in many other orders without affecting the score):

(format is (Word score)(Cumulative score) Word (Uppercase indicates new tiles))



  1. (0)(0) IN (both blanks) (Double word)

  2. (1)(1) Rin (add the R)

  3. (15)(16) IMPrinTING (Double letters - I and N)

  4. (7)(23) iRING (Double letter - G)

  5. (23)(46) REACQUiring (Double letter - A)

  6. (15)(61) EXIgENT

  7. (8)(69) eBBS

  8. (8)(77) LOOsED (Double letter - O)

  9. (8)(85) tAKE

  10. (13)(98) SWeATY (Double letter - A)

  11. (8)(107) AUDiTOR

  12. (5)(112) IDEa

  13. (10)(122) MOOiNG (Double letter - O)

  14. (11)(133) AJAr

  15. (10)(143) FLaILS (Double letter - I)

  16. (16)(159) UNSaVVY

  17. (6)(165) ECRu

  18. (22)(187) WHEeZE (Double letter - E)

  19. (7)(194) TAUnTER

  20. (4)(198) tOIL

  21. (10)(208) POOlED (Double letter - O)

  22. (7)(215) rIFE

  23. (6)(223) HAe

  24. (2)(225) At





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Whoops! Just noticed that there should be an extra 50 pts added, because I had one bingo. Will try to rework.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you play Tournament rules, and (incorrectly) challenge each word, then you subtract 5 points each turn for 120 point discount.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Cudmore
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    playing 'print (5)' instead of 'rin (1)' avoids the bingo and gives a total score of 229
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Mathias
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Out of interest, what's the Scrabble board editor you're using?
    $endgroup$
    – ZanyG
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ZanyG I just googled and found this one.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    48 mins ago


















4












$begingroup$

I started with the solution given in a paper found by DqwertyC in a comment. Unfortunately, it contains several errors, including invalid words, incorrect scoring, and the wrong tile distribution. Finding ways to resolve these errors gave me the following board.



scrabble board



The opening play is es, using both blanks. The next 3 plays of voicers, epigram, and thirties overlap only in blanks. Each of the subsequent $19$ plays forms one of the remaining $19$ visible words, overlapping in exactly one 1-point tile. The bonus squares used are $10$ 1-point tiles on double letter squares (at G3, I3, A4, I7, M7, D8, M9, A12, H12, and D15). Every play uses at most 6 tiles, so no bingos occur. This incurs a total penalty of $19+10=29$ on the total tile score of $187$, resulting in a final score of $187+29=216$.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Spitemaster is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80939%2flowest-total-scrabble-score%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    I've managed a score of $225$. I'm sure a better score is possible, since there were a few places where I was not optimal.



    It's impossible to avoid all the "special" squares on the board, so I chose only to hit a few of the Double Letter squares, which are no more penalizing than creating an extra join between words (i.e. it's probably more beneficial to cross a few Double Word squares and get a lot of longer words than it is to squeeze my way in between the "special" square using 3-letter words).



    I started out using both blanks to negate the automatic Double Word that occurs on the starting square.



    Here is the final board:
    enter image description here



    And here is the sequence of moves (they could go in many other orders without affecting the score):

    (format is (Word score)(Cumulative score) Word (Uppercase indicates new tiles))



    1. (0)(0) IN (both blanks) (Double word)

    2. (1)(1) Rin (add the R)

    3. (15)(16) IMPrinTING (Double letters - I and N)

    4. (7)(23) iRING (Double letter - G)

    5. (23)(46) REACQUiring (Double letter - A)

    6. (15)(61) EXIgENT

    7. (8)(69) eBBS

    8. (8)(77) LOOsED (Double letter - O)

    9. (8)(85) tAKE

    10. (13)(98) SWeATY (Double letter - A)

    11. (8)(107) AUDiTOR

    12. (5)(112) IDEa

    13. (10)(122) MOOiNG (Double letter - O)

    14. (11)(133) AJAr

    15. (10)(143) FLaILS (Double letter - I)

    16. (16)(159) UNSaVVY

    17. (6)(165) ECRu

    18. (22)(187) WHEeZE (Double letter - E)

    19. (7)(194) TAUnTER

    20. (4)(198) tOIL

    21. (10)(208) POOlED (Double letter - O)

    22. (7)(215) rIFE

    23. (6)(223) HAe

    24. (2)(225) At





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Whoops! Just noticed that there should be an extra 50 pts added, because I had one bingo. Will try to rework.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      If you play Tournament rules, and (incorrectly) challenge each word, then you subtract 5 points each turn for 120 point discount.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Cudmore
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      playing 'print (5)' instead of 'rin (1)' avoids the bingo and gives a total score of 229
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Mathias
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Out of interest, what's the Scrabble board editor you're using?
      $endgroup$
      – ZanyG
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ZanyG I just googled and found this one.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      48 mins ago















    5












    $begingroup$

    I've managed a score of $225$. I'm sure a better score is possible, since there were a few places where I was not optimal.



    It's impossible to avoid all the "special" squares on the board, so I chose only to hit a few of the Double Letter squares, which are no more penalizing than creating an extra join between words (i.e. it's probably more beneficial to cross a few Double Word squares and get a lot of longer words than it is to squeeze my way in between the "special" square using 3-letter words).



    I started out using both blanks to negate the automatic Double Word that occurs on the starting square.



    Here is the final board:
    enter image description here



    And here is the sequence of moves (they could go in many other orders without affecting the score):

    (format is (Word score)(Cumulative score) Word (Uppercase indicates new tiles))



    1. (0)(0) IN (both blanks) (Double word)

    2. (1)(1) Rin (add the R)

    3. (15)(16) IMPrinTING (Double letters - I and N)

    4. (7)(23) iRING (Double letter - G)

    5. (23)(46) REACQUiring (Double letter - A)

    6. (15)(61) EXIgENT

    7. (8)(69) eBBS

    8. (8)(77) LOOsED (Double letter - O)

    9. (8)(85) tAKE

    10. (13)(98) SWeATY (Double letter - A)

    11. (8)(107) AUDiTOR

    12. (5)(112) IDEa

    13. (10)(122) MOOiNG (Double letter - O)

    14. (11)(133) AJAr

    15. (10)(143) FLaILS (Double letter - I)

    16. (16)(159) UNSaVVY

    17. (6)(165) ECRu

    18. (22)(187) WHEeZE (Double letter - E)

    19. (7)(194) TAUnTER

    20. (4)(198) tOIL

    21. (10)(208) POOlED (Double letter - O)

    22. (7)(215) rIFE

    23. (6)(223) HAe

    24. (2)(225) At





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Whoops! Just noticed that there should be an extra 50 pts added, because I had one bingo. Will try to rework.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      If you play Tournament rules, and (incorrectly) challenge each word, then you subtract 5 points each turn for 120 point discount.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Cudmore
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      playing 'print (5)' instead of 'rin (1)' avoids the bingo and gives a total score of 229
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Mathias
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Out of interest, what's the Scrabble board editor you're using?
      $endgroup$
      – ZanyG
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ZanyG I just googled and found this one.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      48 mins ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    I've managed a score of $225$. I'm sure a better score is possible, since there were a few places where I was not optimal.



    It's impossible to avoid all the "special" squares on the board, so I chose only to hit a few of the Double Letter squares, which are no more penalizing than creating an extra join between words (i.e. it's probably more beneficial to cross a few Double Word squares and get a lot of longer words than it is to squeeze my way in between the "special" square using 3-letter words).



    I started out using both blanks to negate the automatic Double Word that occurs on the starting square.



    Here is the final board:
    enter image description here



    And here is the sequence of moves (they could go in many other orders without affecting the score):

    (format is (Word score)(Cumulative score) Word (Uppercase indicates new tiles))



    1. (0)(0) IN (both blanks) (Double word)

    2. (1)(1) Rin (add the R)

    3. (15)(16) IMPrinTING (Double letters - I and N)

    4. (7)(23) iRING (Double letter - G)

    5. (23)(46) REACQUiring (Double letter - A)

    6. (15)(61) EXIgENT

    7. (8)(69) eBBS

    8. (8)(77) LOOsED (Double letter - O)

    9. (8)(85) tAKE

    10. (13)(98) SWeATY (Double letter - A)

    11. (8)(107) AUDiTOR

    12. (5)(112) IDEa

    13. (10)(122) MOOiNG (Double letter - O)

    14. (11)(133) AJAr

    15. (10)(143) FLaILS (Double letter - I)

    16. (16)(159) UNSaVVY

    17. (6)(165) ECRu

    18. (22)(187) WHEeZE (Double letter - E)

    19. (7)(194) TAUnTER

    20. (4)(198) tOIL

    21. (10)(208) POOlED (Double letter - O)

    22. (7)(215) rIFE

    23. (6)(223) HAe

    24. (2)(225) At





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    I've managed a score of $225$. I'm sure a better score is possible, since there were a few places where I was not optimal.



    It's impossible to avoid all the "special" squares on the board, so I chose only to hit a few of the Double Letter squares, which are no more penalizing than creating an extra join between words (i.e. it's probably more beneficial to cross a few Double Word squares and get a lot of longer words than it is to squeeze my way in between the "special" square using 3-letter words).



    I started out using both blanks to negate the automatic Double Word that occurs on the starting square.



    Here is the final board:
    enter image description here



    And here is the sequence of moves (they could go in many other orders without affecting the score):

    (format is (Word score)(Cumulative score) Word (Uppercase indicates new tiles))



    1. (0)(0) IN (both blanks) (Double word)

    2. (1)(1) Rin (add the R)

    3. (15)(16) IMPrinTING (Double letters - I and N)

    4. (7)(23) iRING (Double letter - G)

    5. (23)(46) REACQUiring (Double letter - A)

    6. (15)(61) EXIgENT

    7. (8)(69) eBBS

    8. (8)(77) LOOsED (Double letter - O)

    9. (8)(85) tAKE

    10. (13)(98) SWeATY (Double letter - A)

    11. (8)(107) AUDiTOR

    12. (5)(112) IDEa

    13. (10)(122) MOOiNG (Double letter - O)

    14. (11)(133) AJAr

    15. (10)(143) FLaILS (Double letter - I)

    16. (16)(159) UNSaVVY

    17. (6)(165) ECRu

    18. (22)(187) WHEeZE (Double letter - E)

    19. (7)(194) TAUnTER

    20. (4)(198) tOIL

    21. (10)(208) POOlED (Double letter - O)

    22. (7)(215) rIFE

    23. (6)(223) HAe

    24. (2)(225) At






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 4 hours ago









    GentlePurpleRainGentlePurpleRain

    17k569136




    17k569136











    • $begingroup$
      Whoops! Just noticed that there should be an extra 50 pts added, because I had one bingo. Will try to rework.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      If you play Tournament rules, and (incorrectly) challenge each word, then you subtract 5 points each turn for 120 point discount.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Cudmore
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      playing 'print (5)' instead of 'rin (1)' avoids the bingo and gives a total score of 229
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Mathias
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Out of interest, what's the Scrabble board editor you're using?
      $endgroup$
      – ZanyG
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ZanyG I just googled and found this one.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      48 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Whoops! Just noticed that there should be an extra 50 pts added, because I had one bingo. Will try to rework.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      If you play Tournament rules, and (incorrectly) challenge each word, then you subtract 5 points each turn for 120 point discount.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Cudmore
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      playing 'print (5)' instead of 'rin (1)' avoids the bingo and gives a total score of 229
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Mathias
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Out of interest, what's the Scrabble board editor you're using?
      $endgroup$
      – ZanyG
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ZanyG I just googled and found this one.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      48 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    Whoops! Just noticed that there should be an extra 50 pts added, because I had one bingo. Will try to rework.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Whoops! Just noticed that there should be an extra 50 pts added, because I had one bingo. Will try to rework.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    3 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    If you play Tournament rules, and (incorrectly) challenge each word, then you subtract 5 points each turn for 120 point discount.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Cudmore
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    If you play Tournament rules, and (incorrectly) challenge each word, then you subtract 5 points each turn for 120 point discount.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Cudmore
    2 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    playing 'print (5)' instead of 'rin (1)' avoids the bingo and gives a total score of 229
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Mathias
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    playing 'print (5)' instead of 'rin (1)' avoids the bingo and gives a total score of 229
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Mathias
    2 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Out of interest, what's the Scrabble board editor you're using?
    $endgroup$
    – ZanyG
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Out of interest, what's the Scrabble board editor you're using?
    $endgroup$
    – ZanyG
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    @ZanyG I just googled and found this one.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    48 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @ZanyG I just googled and found this one.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    48 mins ago











    4












    $begingroup$

    I started with the solution given in a paper found by DqwertyC in a comment. Unfortunately, it contains several errors, including invalid words, incorrect scoring, and the wrong tile distribution. Finding ways to resolve these errors gave me the following board.



    scrabble board



    The opening play is es, using both blanks. The next 3 plays of voicers, epigram, and thirties overlap only in blanks. Each of the subsequent $19$ plays forms one of the remaining $19$ visible words, overlapping in exactly one 1-point tile. The bonus squares used are $10$ 1-point tiles on double letter squares (at G3, I3, A4, I7, M7, D8, M9, A12, H12, and D15). Every play uses at most 6 tiles, so no bingos occur. This incurs a total penalty of $19+10=29$ on the total tile score of $187$, resulting in a final score of $187+29=216$.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      I started with the solution given in a paper found by DqwertyC in a comment. Unfortunately, it contains several errors, including invalid words, incorrect scoring, and the wrong tile distribution. Finding ways to resolve these errors gave me the following board.



      scrabble board



      The opening play is es, using both blanks. The next 3 plays of voicers, epigram, and thirties overlap only in blanks. Each of the subsequent $19$ plays forms one of the remaining $19$ visible words, overlapping in exactly one 1-point tile. The bonus squares used are $10$ 1-point tiles on double letter squares (at G3, I3, A4, I7, M7, D8, M9, A12, H12, and D15). Every play uses at most 6 tiles, so no bingos occur. This incurs a total penalty of $19+10=29$ on the total tile score of $187$, resulting in a final score of $187+29=216$.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        I started with the solution given in a paper found by DqwertyC in a comment. Unfortunately, it contains several errors, including invalid words, incorrect scoring, and the wrong tile distribution. Finding ways to resolve these errors gave me the following board.



        scrabble board



        The opening play is es, using both blanks. The next 3 plays of voicers, epigram, and thirties overlap only in blanks. Each of the subsequent $19$ plays forms one of the remaining $19$ visible words, overlapping in exactly one 1-point tile. The bonus squares used are $10$ 1-point tiles on double letter squares (at G3, I3, A4, I7, M7, D8, M9, A12, H12, and D15). Every play uses at most 6 tiles, so no bingos occur. This incurs a total penalty of $19+10=29$ on the total tile score of $187$, resulting in a final score of $187+29=216$.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        I started with the solution given in a paper found by DqwertyC in a comment. Unfortunately, it contains several errors, including invalid words, incorrect scoring, and the wrong tile distribution. Finding ways to resolve these errors gave me the following board.



        scrabble board



        The opening play is es, using both blanks. The next 3 plays of voicers, epigram, and thirties overlap only in blanks. Each of the subsequent $19$ plays forms one of the remaining $19$ visible words, overlapping in exactly one 1-point tile. The bonus squares used are $10$ 1-point tiles on double letter squares (at G3, I3, A4, I7, M7, D8, M9, A12, H12, and D15). Every play uses at most 6 tiles, so no bingos occur. This incurs a total penalty of $19+10=29$ on the total tile score of $187$, resulting in a final score of $187+29=216$.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        noednenoedne

        7,11712057




        7,11712057




















            Spitemaster is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Spitemaster is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Spitemaster is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Spitemaster is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80939%2flowest-total-scrabble-score%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

            Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

            Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6