Physiological effects of huge anime eyes The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to Design a Plague that Causes Insanity?What justifications would people use to justify discrimination of people with special powers?You're superstrong but you still weigh the same. What happens when you hit things?How can you have dualism in Hard SF?Is ignorance of time dilation effects justified?In a slightly more scientifically advanced society. Would half human be discriminatedWorldbuilding & Climate: How does the sun affect a simple sphere with atmosphere?Alternative options to change sex-based characteristics in a non-modern world setting?What would be a plausible reason why humans have lost their intelligence?Effect of 1.5g (Induced hypertension health effects?)

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

Traduction de « Life is a roller coaster »

Getting Stale Gas Out of a Gas Tank w/out Dropping the Tank

Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Does destroying a Lich's phylactery destroy the soul within it?

Purpose of level-shifter with same in and out voltages

Sulfuric acid symmetry point group

Towers in the ocean; How deep can they be built?

Ubuntu - "sudo iptables" command works in terminal, doesn't work in bash script

Strength of face-nailed connection for stair steps

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Aggressive Under-Indexing and no data for missing index

Defamation due to breach of confidentiality

Can this note be analyzed as a non-chord tone?

Physiological effects of huge anime eyes

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico

Is "three point ish" an acceptable use of ish?

Are the names of these months realistic?

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

Help/tips for a first time writer?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?



Physiological effects of huge anime eyes



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to Design a Plague that Causes Insanity?What justifications would people use to justify discrimination of people with special powers?You're superstrong but you still weigh the same. What happens when you hit things?How can you have dualism in Hard SF?Is ignorance of time dilation effects justified?In a slightly more scientifically advanced society. Would half human be discriminatedWorldbuilding & Climate: How does the sun affect a simple sphere with atmosphere?Alternative options to change sex-based characteristics in a non-modern world setting?What would be a plausible reason why humans have lost their intelligence?Effect of 1.5g (Induced hypertension health effects?)










6












$begingroup$


Anime, Disney, and many, many other works feature human characters with ridiculously oversized eyes. This is usually just a stylistic choice, and had little to no effect on anything in-story or in-universe. What if it did have an effect?



Say that a real-world human was given eyes of the same proportion as the stylized ones you see in anime, Disney, etc: What would the physiological effects be? What would be gained, and what would be lost?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not just a stylistic choice. It has an effect: it conveys emotion in a more efficient way. Eyes in anime or animated movies are extremely expressive and much more mobile than real eyes, it can go from a single horizontal line to huge, shiny, tear-filled globes. It conveys empathy for the viewer. A world whose inhabitants would have huge eyes may communicate a lot on a non-verbal level.
    $endgroup$
    – kikirex
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kikirex That's an interesting observation. Conveys emotion more efficiently compared to what, the biology of humanity today? That's an artistic interpretation based on modern behaviors. If we evolved with, say 2X the eyeball diameter, would we actually be more emotionally expressive, or would there be no practical difference? Can you turn your comment into an answer and better rationalize how that would be true? The details would be fascinating.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago















6












$begingroup$


Anime, Disney, and many, many other works feature human characters with ridiculously oversized eyes. This is usually just a stylistic choice, and had little to no effect on anything in-story or in-universe. What if it did have an effect?



Say that a real-world human was given eyes of the same proportion as the stylized ones you see in anime, Disney, etc: What would the physiological effects be? What would be gained, and what would be lost?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not just a stylistic choice. It has an effect: it conveys emotion in a more efficient way. Eyes in anime or animated movies are extremely expressive and much more mobile than real eyes, it can go from a single horizontal line to huge, shiny, tear-filled globes. It conveys empathy for the viewer. A world whose inhabitants would have huge eyes may communicate a lot on a non-verbal level.
    $endgroup$
    – kikirex
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kikirex That's an interesting observation. Conveys emotion more efficiently compared to what, the biology of humanity today? That's an artistic interpretation based on modern behaviors. If we evolved with, say 2X the eyeball diameter, would we actually be more emotionally expressive, or would there be no practical difference? Can you turn your comment into an answer and better rationalize how that would be true? The details would be fascinating.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago













6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


Anime, Disney, and many, many other works feature human characters with ridiculously oversized eyes. This is usually just a stylistic choice, and had little to no effect on anything in-story or in-universe. What if it did have an effect?



Say that a real-world human was given eyes of the same proportion as the stylized ones you see in anime, Disney, etc: What would the physiological effects be? What would be gained, and what would be lost?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Anime, Disney, and many, many other works feature human characters with ridiculously oversized eyes. This is usually just a stylistic choice, and had little to no effect on anything in-story or in-universe. What if it did have an effect?



Say that a real-world human was given eyes of the same proportion as the stylized ones you see in anime, Disney, etc: What would the physiological effects be? What would be gained, and what would be lost?







science-based humans






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Junkey McKratJunkey McKrat

524135




524135







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not just a stylistic choice. It has an effect: it conveys emotion in a more efficient way. Eyes in anime or animated movies are extremely expressive and much more mobile than real eyes, it can go from a single horizontal line to huge, shiny, tear-filled globes. It conveys empathy for the viewer. A world whose inhabitants would have huge eyes may communicate a lot on a non-verbal level.
    $endgroup$
    – kikirex
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kikirex That's an interesting observation. Conveys emotion more efficiently compared to what, the biology of humanity today? That's an artistic interpretation based on modern behaviors. If we evolved with, say 2X the eyeball diameter, would we actually be more emotionally expressive, or would there be no practical difference? Can you turn your comment into an answer and better rationalize how that would be true? The details would be fascinating.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not just a stylistic choice. It has an effect: it conveys emotion in a more efficient way. Eyes in anime or animated movies are extremely expressive and much more mobile than real eyes, it can go from a single horizontal line to huge, shiny, tear-filled globes. It conveys empathy for the viewer. A world whose inhabitants would have huge eyes may communicate a lot on a non-verbal level.
    $endgroup$
    – kikirex
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kikirex That's an interesting observation. Conveys emotion more efficiently compared to what, the biology of humanity today? That's an artistic interpretation based on modern behaviors. If we evolved with, say 2X the eyeball diameter, would we actually be more emotionally expressive, or would there be no practical difference? Can you turn your comment into an answer and better rationalize how that would be true? The details would be fascinating.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
It is not just a stylistic choice. It has an effect: it conveys emotion in a more efficient way. Eyes in anime or animated movies are extremely expressive and much more mobile than real eyes, it can go from a single horizontal line to huge, shiny, tear-filled globes. It conveys empathy for the viewer. A world whose inhabitants would have huge eyes may communicate a lot on a non-verbal level.
$endgroup$
– kikirex
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
It is not just a stylistic choice. It has an effect: it conveys emotion in a more efficient way. Eyes in anime or animated movies are extremely expressive and much more mobile than real eyes, it can go from a single horizontal line to huge, shiny, tear-filled globes. It conveys empathy for the viewer. A world whose inhabitants would have huge eyes may communicate a lot on a non-verbal level.
$endgroup$
– kikirex
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@kikirex That's an interesting observation. Conveys emotion more efficiently compared to what, the biology of humanity today? That's an artistic interpretation based on modern behaviors. If we evolved with, say 2X the eyeball diameter, would we actually be more emotionally expressive, or would there be no practical difference? Can you turn your comment into an answer and better rationalize how that would be true? The details would be fascinating.
$endgroup$
– JBH
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@kikirex That's an interesting observation. Conveys emotion more efficiently compared to what, the biology of humanity today? That's an artistic interpretation based on modern behaviors. If we evolved with, say 2X the eyeball diameter, would we actually be more emotionally expressive, or would there be no practical difference? Can you turn your comment into an answer and better rationalize how that would be true? The details would be fascinating.
$endgroup$
– JBH
2 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Can eyes be something other than spherical?



I don't have the anthropological expertise to know if there are any eyeballs in nature that aren't spherical. If nature can only make a spherical eyeball, then one of the consequences of a larger eye is less space for either (or both) the brain or the sinuses. It might also impact hearing as larger eyes might impact the auditory channels (although I believe this has a low chance of happening, unless the eyes are huge).



The result is a drop in breathing efficiency and mental capacity.



It also would require a wider skull (which might offset the two items I just mentioned). The closer together the eyes, the less valuable our 3D vision. Our brains use the data from the two eyes to "triangulate" objects in 3D space. Bigger eyes would mean wider spacing which would improve 3D acuity. And it would make our faces look much flatter. It would also increase the "blind spot" between our eyes as something approaches our noses (or, more specifically, the bridge of our nose). That would lower our ability to react to objects that might damage our eyesight or heads.



Pros:



  • Better 3D acuity

Cons:



  • Less space for the brain (less brain = bad)

  • Less space for sinuses (harder to breathe and filter the atmosphere)

  • Increases vulnerability.

But, what if they could be elliptical?



We can recover a lot of that lost space for the brain, etc, if we allow for elliptical and flattened eyes. But that has a terrible cost. Without the sphere, the "mathematics" of processing light become much more complex: and biologically that would most likely result in limitations. You also couldn't easily move the eyes with muscles, limiting the angular sweep the eyes can accommodate. So, you get the same pro, but pretty much the same number of cons, just different cons.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nature does have non-spherical eyes (have a look at how jumping spiders see) but that probably doesn't help here. Really what you want is a much more complex system of lenses, like we have in human-made optical systems. Have a look at the goold old Zeiss Planar for example.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    13 mins ago


















2












$begingroup$

It depends on how the eye is build exactly.



Horses have some of the largest eyes of land animals (some squids have soccerball sized eyes but they have different light exposure). So size isnt the issue.



Hawks have similar size eyeballs, but way larger pupils than humans (https://images.app.goo.gl/xf8cQcrU7QECDGgt8). So overexposure isnt an immediate problem. However a larger pupil means you need a deeper eye for a sharp picture.



Aye ayes and other nocturnal creatures also use large eyes for their size in order to gather more light. Often complemented with a kind of mirror behind the fotosensitive cells to reflect the light and catch more with the cells. This is the reason why shining in the eyes of for example cats and dogs their eyes light up so weirdly.



If you go for nocturnal eyes the size can help them to see but not necessarily help them see sharply. If you go for sharp or hawk vision you have another problem: eyeball size. With eyes that big the rest of the organs in the head will have less space. This will limit the nose cavity and breathing, which will have to be moved lower in the head. This means that your mouth will be smaller and eating will be harder or your face needs to be longer. But that is nothing when you consider the brain. If you keep human dimensions their brain will be smaller, and their intelligence will suffer for it.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    I'm no biologist so I'll stay away from skull size, capturing more light or others physiological effects that L.Dutch and JBH already covered; instead I will focus on a more psychological aspect.



    Big eyes convey a lot of non-verbal communication



    Big eyes in animation are a trope because "eyes are the mirror of the soul". This is the part of the body most of us notice first. Also, eyes are capable of conveying a lot of information for someone who can read it: envy, lies, fatigue, sadness... human have evolved to a point where we can understand other's emotions without having even beginning to talk.



    My guess is that bigger, anime-style eyes, would be much more mobile and expressive. The average human eye has twelve muscles, and i'm not counting those for the eyelashes, etc. With eyes twice the size, these muscles could provide a lot more of expressions, from the most subtle wink to a full black-eyed pupil.



    So, what's the use?



    Seduction/intimidation



    Big eyes convey empathy. When you crave for something, be it a sexual partner or that fancy pair of shoes, your subconcious make your eyes widen, so you can capture more light and see better what caused this sudden urge. And, on the other side, it is known that dilated pupils are considered as more desirable trais when seeking for a mating partner.



    But your eyes also widen more when in conflict. This is one of the answers of our body for an imminent fight-or-flee situation: we are aware there is danger and we are already seeking an exit. Showing big eyes with black dilated pupils at this point is telling your opponent: "I am ready to fight" and can be a factor of intimidation. This is why some animals sometimes show "fake eyes", they serve as a way to fool predators into thinking they are staring at the face of an even bigger creature.



    Long story short: your big-eyed humans may probably demonstrate more animal behavior, related to instinct, when it comes to seduction or intimidation, and may be able to read other people's emotions much more accurately, to the point it could even look like a form of telepathy.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      -1












      $begingroup$

      With a pupil twice or thrice the diameter of a normal human eyes, the eyes of your manga men would harvest from four to eight times the light human eyes do, thus they would hardly be able to tolerate full day light, and would be better nocturnal creatures.



      As a consequence they would be pale skinned, since melanine wouldn't be needed.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        This is an interesting point. Can we assume that Terrestrial biology is so consistent that we can say the rods and cones wouldn't be desensitized in a larger eye? I'm curious. I'm certain that I'm oversimplifying something awful, but I assume the basic evolutionary trend is, "the most capability with the most protected solution" which means the smallest possible eyes with the greatest possible utility. I think.
        $endgroup$
        – JBH
        2 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Horses have eyes of up to 5cm and dont have immediate problem. Although their pupils do have an alternative shape, it is not impossible for anime eyes to work normally unless you really scale up human eyes to such sizes. But these are ANIME eyes, which can be found on both humans and many anthropomorphological (is that spelled right?) creatures. I see no reason why these anime eyes would be upscaled human eyes.
        $endgroup$
        – Demigan
        1 hour ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Is this answer supposed to be humoristic and I have just suffered of a sudden attack of humorlessness? Or else, are you completely uninterested in photography? What counts is not the size of the entry pupil as such, but the relative size of the entry pupil with respect to the image; that's why in photography we measure aperture as a relative number, say ƒ/2 or ƒ/4. The pupil being 2 or 3 as large means it gathers 4 or 9 times as much light which then falls on a 4 or 9 times as large image area, for an overall identical image brightness. The only net effect is less noise in low light.
        $endgroup$
        – AlexP
        27 mins ago












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142887%2fphysiological-effects-of-huge-anime-eyes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      Can eyes be something other than spherical?



      I don't have the anthropological expertise to know if there are any eyeballs in nature that aren't spherical. If nature can only make a spherical eyeball, then one of the consequences of a larger eye is less space for either (or both) the brain or the sinuses. It might also impact hearing as larger eyes might impact the auditory channels (although I believe this has a low chance of happening, unless the eyes are huge).



      The result is a drop in breathing efficiency and mental capacity.



      It also would require a wider skull (which might offset the two items I just mentioned). The closer together the eyes, the less valuable our 3D vision. Our brains use the data from the two eyes to "triangulate" objects in 3D space. Bigger eyes would mean wider spacing which would improve 3D acuity. And it would make our faces look much flatter. It would also increase the "blind spot" between our eyes as something approaches our noses (or, more specifically, the bridge of our nose). That would lower our ability to react to objects that might damage our eyesight or heads.



      Pros:



      • Better 3D acuity

      Cons:



      • Less space for the brain (less brain = bad)

      • Less space for sinuses (harder to breathe and filter the atmosphere)

      • Increases vulnerability.

      But, what if they could be elliptical?



      We can recover a lot of that lost space for the brain, etc, if we allow for elliptical and flattened eyes. But that has a terrible cost. Without the sphere, the "mathematics" of processing light become much more complex: and biologically that would most likely result in limitations. You also couldn't easily move the eyes with muscles, limiting the angular sweep the eyes can accommodate. So, you get the same pro, but pretty much the same number of cons, just different cons.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Nature does have non-spherical eyes (have a look at how jumping spiders see) but that probably doesn't help here. Really what you want is a much more complex system of lenses, like we have in human-made optical systems. Have a look at the goold old Zeiss Planar for example.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        13 mins ago















      2












      $begingroup$

      Can eyes be something other than spherical?



      I don't have the anthropological expertise to know if there are any eyeballs in nature that aren't spherical. If nature can only make a spherical eyeball, then one of the consequences of a larger eye is less space for either (or both) the brain or the sinuses. It might also impact hearing as larger eyes might impact the auditory channels (although I believe this has a low chance of happening, unless the eyes are huge).



      The result is a drop in breathing efficiency and mental capacity.



      It also would require a wider skull (which might offset the two items I just mentioned). The closer together the eyes, the less valuable our 3D vision. Our brains use the data from the two eyes to "triangulate" objects in 3D space. Bigger eyes would mean wider spacing which would improve 3D acuity. And it would make our faces look much flatter. It would also increase the "blind spot" between our eyes as something approaches our noses (or, more specifically, the bridge of our nose). That would lower our ability to react to objects that might damage our eyesight or heads.



      Pros:



      • Better 3D acuity

      Cons:



      • Less space for the brain (less brain = bad)

      • Less space for sinuses (harder to breathe and filter the atmosphere)

      • Increases vulnerability.

      But, what if they could be elliptical?



      We can recover a lot of that lost space for the brain, etc, if we allow for elliptical and flattened eyes. But that has a terrible cost. Without the sphere, the "mathematics" of processing light become much more complex: and biologically that would most likely result in limitations. You also couldn't easily move the eyes with muscles, limiting the angular sweep the eyes can accommodate. So, you get the same pro, but pretty much the same number of cons, just different cons.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Nature does have non-spherical eyes (have a look at how jumping spiders see) but that probably doesn't help here. Really what you want is a much more complex system of lenses, like we have in human-made optical systems. Have a look at the goold old Zeiss Planar for example.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        13 mins ago













      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$

      Can eyes be something other than spherical?



      I don't have the anthropological expertise to know if there are any eyeballs in nature that aren't spherical. If nature can only make a spherical eyeball, then one of the consequences of a larger eye is less space for either (or both) the brain or the sinuses. It might also impact hearing as larger eyes might impact the auditory channels (although I believe this has a low chance of happening, unless the eyes are huge).



      The result is a drop in breathing efficiency and mental capacity.



      It also would require a wider skull (which might offset the two items I just mentioned). The closer together the eyes, the less valuable our 3D vision. Our brains use the data from the two eyes to "triangulate" objects in 3D space. Bigger eyes would mean wider spacing which would improve 3D acuity. And it would make our faces look much flatter. It would also increase the "blind spot" between our eyes as something approaches our noses (or, more specifically, the bridge of our nose). That would lower our ability to react to objects that might damage our eyesight or heads.



      Pros:



      • Better 3D acuity

      Cons:



      • Less space for the brain (less brain = bad)

      • Less space for sinuses (harder to breathe and filter the atmosphere)

      • Increases vulnerability.

      But, what if they could be elliptical?



      We can recover a lot of that lost space for the brain, etc, if we allow for elliptical and flattened eyes. But that has a terrible cost. Without the sphere, the "mathematics" of processing light become much more complex: and biologically that would most likely result in limitations. You also couldn't easily move the eyes with muscles, limiting the angular sweep the eyes can accommodate. So, you get the same pro, but pretty much the same number of cons, just different cons.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Can eyes be something other than spherical?



      I don't have the anthropological expertise to know if there are any eyeballs in nature that aren't spherical. If nature can only make a spherical eyeball, then one of the consequences of a larger eye is less space for either (or both) the brain or the sinuses. It might also impact hearing as larger eyes might impact the auditory channels (although I believe this has a low chance of happening, unless the eyes are huge).



      The result is a drop in breathing efficiency and mental capacity.



      It also would require a wider skull (which might offset the two items I just mentioned). The closer together the eyes, the less valuable our 3D vision. Our brains use the data from the two eyes to "triangulate" objects in 3D space. Bigger eyes would mean wider spacing which would improve 3D acuity. And it would make our faces look much flatter. It would also increase the "blind spot" between our eyes as something approaches our noses (or, more specifically, the bridge of our nose). That would lower our ability to react to objects that might damage our eyesight or heads.



      Pros:



      • Better 3D acuity

      Cons:



      • Less space for the brain (less brain = bad)

      • Less space for sinuses (harder to breathe and filter the atmosphere)

      • Increases vulnerability.

      But, what if they could be elliptical?



      We can recover a lot of that lost space for the brain, etc, if we allow for elliptical and flattened eyes. But that has a terrible cost. Without the sphere, the "mathematics" of processing light become much more complex: and biologically that would most likely result in limitations. You also couldn't easily move the eyes with muscles, limiting the angular sweep the eyes can accommodate. So, you get the same pro, but pretty much the same number of cons, just different cons.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 1 hour ago









      JBHJBH

      47.4k699222




      47.4k699222











      • $begingroup$
        Nature does have non-spherical eyes (have a look at how jumping spiders see) but that probably doesn't help here. Really what you want is a much more complex system of lenses, like we have in human-made optical systems. Have a look at the goold old Zeiss Planar for example.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        13 mins ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Nature does have non-spherical eyes (have a look at how jumping spiders see) but that probably doesn't help here. Really what you want is a much more complex system of lenses, like we have in human-made optical systems. Have a look at the goold old Zeiss Planar for example.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        13 mins ago















      $begingroup$
      Nature does have non-spherical eyes (have a look at how jumping spiders see) but that probably doesn't help here. Really what you want is a much more complex system of lenses, like we have in human-made optical systems. Have a look at the goold old Zeiss Planar for example.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      13 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Nature does have non-spherical eyes (have a look at how jumping spiders see) but that probably doesn't help here. Really what you want is a much more complex system of lenses, like we have in human-made optical systems. Have a look at the goold old Zeiss Planar for example.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      13 mins ago











      2












      $begingroup$

      It depends on how the eye is build exactly.



      Horses have some of the largest eyes of land animals (some squids have soccerball sized eyes but they have different light exposure). So size isnt the issue.



      Hawks have similar size eyeballs, but way larger pupils than humans (https://images.app.goo.gl/xf8cQcrU7QECDGgt8). So overexposure isnt an immediate problem. However a larger pupil means you need a deeper eye for a sharp picture.



      Aye ayes and other nocturnal creatures also use large eyes for their size in order to gather more light. Often complemented with a kind of mirror behind the fotosensitive cells to reflect the light and catch more with the cells. This is the reason why shining in the eyes of for example cats and dogs their eyes light up so weirdly.



      If you go for nocturnal eyes the size can help them to see but not necessarily help them see sharply. If you go for sharp or hawk vision you have another problem: eyeball size. With eyes that big the rest of the organs in the head will have less space. This will limit the nose cavity and breathing, which will have to be moved lower in the head. This means that your mouth will be smaller and eating will be harder or your face needs to be longer. But that is nothing when you consider the brain. If you keep human dimensions their brain will be smaller, and their intelligence will suffer for it.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        2












        $begingroup$

        It depends on how the eye is build exactly.



        Horses have some of the largest eyes of land animals (some squids have soccerball sized eyes but they have different light exposure). So size isnt the issue.



        Hawks have similar size eyeballs, but way larger pupils than humans (https://images.app.goo.gl/xf8cQcrU7QECDGgt8). So overexposure isnt an immediate problem. However a larger pupil means you need a deeper eye for a sharp picture.



        Aye ayes and other nocturnal creatures also use large eyes for their size in order to gather more light. Often complemented with a kind of mirror behind the fotosensitive cells to reflect the light and catch more with the cells. This is the reason why shining in the eyes of for example cats and dogs their eyes light up so weirdly.



        If you go for nocturnal eyes the size can help them to see but not necessarily help them see sharply. If you go for sharp or hawk vision you have another problem: eyeball size. With eyes that big the rest of the organs in the head will have less space. This will limit the nose cavity and breathing, which will have to be moved lower in the head. This means that your mouth will be smaller and eating will be harder or your face needs to be longer. But that is nothing when you consider the brain. If you keep human dimensions their brain will be smaller, and their intelligence will suffer for it.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          It depends on how the eye is build exactly.



          Horses have some of the largest eyes of land animals (some squids have soccerball sized eyes but they have different light exposure). So size isnt the issue.



          Hawks have similar size eyeballs, but way larger pupils than humans (https://images.app.goo.gl/xf8cQcrU7QECDGgt8). So overexposure isnt an immediate problem. However a larger pupil means you need a deeper eye for a sharp picture.



          Aye ayes and other nocturnal creatures also use large eyes for their size in order to gather more light. Often complemented with a kind of mirror behind the fotosensitive cells to reflect the light and catch more with the cells. This is the reason why shining in the eyes of for example cats and dogs their eyes light up so weirdly.



          If you go for nocturnal eyes the size can help them to see but not necessarily help them see sharply. If you go for sharp or hawk vision you have another problem: eyeball size. With eyes that big the rest of the organs in the head will have less space. This will limit the nose cavity and breathing, which will have to be moved lower in the head. This means that your mouth will be smaller and eating will be harder or your face needs to be longer. But that is nothing when you consider the brain. If you keep human dimensions their brain will be smaller, and their intelligence will suffer for it.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          It depends on how the eye is build exactly.



          Horses have some of the largest eyes of land animals (some squids have soccerball sized eyes but they have different light exposure). So size isnt the issue.



          Hawks have similar size eyeballs, but way larger pupils than humans (https://images.app.goo.gl/xf8cQcrU7QECDGgt8). So overexposure isnt an immediate problem. However a larger pupil means you need a deeper eye for a sharp picture.



          Aye ayes and other nocturnal creatures also use large eyes for their size in order to gather more light. Often complemented with a kind of mirror behind the fotosensitive cells to reflect the light and catch more with the cells. This is the reason why shining in the eyes of for example cats and dogs their eyes light up so weirdly.



          If you go for nocturnal eyes the size can help them to see but not necessarily help them see sharply. If you go for sharp or hawk vision you have another problem: eyeball size. With eyes that big the rest of the organs in the head will have less space. This will limit the nose cavity and breathing, which will have to be moved lower in the head. This means that your mouth will be smaller and eating will be harder or your face needs to be longer. But that is nothing when you consider the brain. If you keep human dimensions their brain will be smaller, and their intelligence will suffer for it.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 46 mins ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          DemiganDemigan

          10.3k11049




          10.3k11049





















              1












              $begingroup$

              I'm no biologist so I'll stay away from skull size, capturing more light or others physiological effects that L.Dutch and JBH already covered; instead I will focus on a more psychological aspect.



              Big eyes convey a lot of non-verbal communication



              Big eyes in animation are a trope because "eyes are the mirror of the soul". This is the part of the body most of us notice first. Also, eyes are capable of conveying a lot of information for someone who can read it: envy, lies, fatigue, sadness... human have evolved to a point where we can understand other's emotions without having even beginning to talk.



              My guess is that bigger, anime-style eyes, would be much more mobile and expressive. The average human eye has twelve muscles, and i'm not counting those for the eyelashes, etc. With eyes twice the size, these muscles could provide a lot more of expressions, from the most subtle wink to a full black-eyed pupil.



              So, what's the use?



              Seduction/intimidation



              Big eyes convey empathy. When you crave for something, be it a sexual partner or that fancy pair of shoes, your subconcious make your eyes widen, so you can capture more light and see better what caused this sudden urge. And, on the other side, it is known that dilated pupils are considered as more desirable trais when seeking for a mating partner.



              But your eyes also widen more when in conflict. This is one of the answers of our body for an imminent fight-or-flee situation: we are aware there is danger and we are already seeking an exit. Showing big eyes with black dilated pupils at this point is telling your opponent: "I am ready to fight" and can be a factor of intimidation. This is why some animals sometimes show "fake eyes", they serve as a way to fool predators into thinking they are staring at the face of an even bigger creature.



              Long story short: your big-eyed humans may probably demonstrate more animal behavior, related to instinct, when it comes to seduction or intimidation, and may be able to read other people's emotions much more accurately, to the point it could even look like a form of telepathy.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                I'm no biologist so I'll stay away from skull size, capturing more light or others physiological effects that L.Dutch and JBH already covered; instead I will focus on a more psychological aspect.



                Big eyes convey a lot of non-verbal communication



                Big eyes in animation are a trope because "eyes are the mirror of the soul". This is the part of the body most of us notice first. Also, eyes are capable of conveying a lot of information for someone who can read it: envy, lies, fatigue, sadness... human have evolved to a point where we can understand other's emotions without having even beginning to talk.



                My guess is that bigger, anime-style eyes, would be much more mobile and expressive. The average human eye has twelve muscles, and i'm not counting those for the eyelashes, etc. With eyes twice the size, these muscles could provide a lot more of expressions, from the most subtle wink to a full black-eyed pupil.



                So, what's the use?



                Seduction/intimidation



                Big eyes convey empathy. When you crave for something, be it a sexual partner or that fancy pair of shoes, your subconcious make your eyes widen, so you can capture more light and see better what caused this sudden urge. And, on the other side, it is known that dilated pupils are considered as more desirable trais when seeking for a mating partner.



                But your eyes also widen more when in conflict. This is one of the answers of our body for an imminent fight-or-flee situation: we are aware there is danger and we are already seeking an exit. Showing big eyes with black dilated pupils at this point is telling your opponent: "I am ready to fight" and can be a factor of intimidation. This is why some animals sometimes show "fake eyes", they serve as a way to fool predators into thinking they are staring at the face of an even bigger creature.



                Long story short: your big-eyed humans may probably demonstrate more animal behavior, related to instinct, when it comes to seduction or intimidation, and may be able to read other people's emotions much more accurately, to the point it could even look like a form of telepathy.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I'm no biologist so I'll stay away from skull size, capturing more light or others physiological effects that L.Dutch and JBH already covered; instead I will focus on a more psychological aspect.



                  Big eyes convey a lot of non-verbal communication



                  Big eyes in animation are a trope because "eyes are the mirror of the soul". This is the part of the body most of us notice first. Also, eyes are capable of conveying a lot of information for someone who can read it: envy, lies, fatigue, sadness... human have evolved to a point where we can understand other's emotions without having even beginning to talk.



                  My guess is that bigger, anime-style eyes, would be much more mobile and expressive. The average human eye has twelve muscles, and i'm not counting those for the eyelashes, etc. With eyes twice the size, these muscles could provide a lot more of expressions, from the most subtle wink to a full black-eyed pupil.



                  So, what's the use?



                  Seduction/intimidation



                  Big eyes convey empathy. When you crave for something, be it a sexual partner or that fancy pair of shoes, your subconcious make your eyes widen, so you can capture more light and see better what caused this sudden urge. And, on the other side, it is known that dilated pupils are considered as more desirable trais when seeking for a mating partner.



                  But your eyes also widen more when in conflict. This is one of the answers of our body for an imminent fight-or-flee situation: we are aware there is danger and we are already seeking an exit. Showing big eyes with black dilated pupils at this point is telling your opponent: "I am ready to fight" and can be a factor of intimidation. This is why some animals sometimes show "fake eyes", they serve as a way to fool predators into thinking they are staring at the face of an even bigger creature.



                  Long story short: your big-eyed humans may probably demonstrate more animal behavior, related to instinct, when it comes to seduction or intimidation, and may be able to read other people's emotions much more accurately, to the point it could even look like a form of telepathy.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I'm no biologist so I'll stay away from skull size, capturing more light or others physiological effects that L.Dutch and JBH already covered; instead I will focus on a more psychological aspect.



                  Big eyes convey a lot of non-verbal communication



                  Big eyes in animation are a trope because "eyes are the mirror of the soul". This is the part of the body most of us notice first. Also, eyes are capable of conveying a lot of information for someone who can read it: envy, lies, fatigue, sadness... human have evolved to a point where we can understand other's emotions without having even beginning to talk.



                  My guess is that bigger, anime-style eyes, would be much more mobile and expressive. The average human eye has twelve muscles, and i'm not counting those for the eyelashes, etc. With eyes twice the size, these muscles could provide a lot more of expressions, from the most subtle wink to a full black-eyed pupil.



                  So, what's the use?



                  Seduction/intimidation



                  Big eyes convey empathy. When you crave for something, be it a sexual partner or that fancy pair of shoes, your subconcious make your eyes widen, so you can capture more light and see better what caused this sudden urge. And, on the other side, it is known that dilated pupils are considered as more desirable trais when seeking for a mating partner.



                  But your eyes also widen more when in conflict. This is one of the answers of our body for an imminent fight-or-flee situation: we are aware there is danger and we are already seeking an exit. Showing big eyes with black dilated pupils at this point is telling your opponent: "I am ready to fight" and can be a factor of intimidation. This is why some animals sometimes show "fake eyes", they serve as a way to fool predators into thinking they are staring at the face of an even bigger creature.



                  Long story short: your big-eyed humans may probably demonstrate more animal behavior, related to instinct, when it comes to seduction or intimidation, and may be able to read other people's emotions much more accurately, to the point it could even look like a form of telepathy.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 56 mins ago









                  kikirexkikirex

                  916410




                  916410





















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      With a pupil twice or thrice the diameter of a normal human eyes, the eyes of your manga men would harvest from four to eight times the light human eyes do, thus they would hardly be able to tolerate full day light, and would be better nocturnal creatures.



                      As a consequence they would be pale skinned, since melanine wouldn't be needed.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        This is an interesting point. Can we assume that Terrestrial biology is so consistent that we can say the rods and cones wouldn't be desensitized in a larger eye? I'm curious. I'm certain that I'm oversimplifying something awful, but I assume the basic evolutionary trend is, "the most capability with the most protected solution" which means the smallest possible eyes with the greatest possible utility. I think.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Horses have eyes of up to 5cm and dont have immediate problem. Although their pupils do have an alternative shape, it is not impossible for anime eyes to work normally unless you really scale up human eyes to such sizes. But these are ANIME eyes, which can be found on both humans and many anthropomorphological (is that spelled right?) creatures. I see no reason why these anime eyes would be upscaled human eyes.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Demigan
                        1 hour ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Is this answer supposed to be humoristic and I have just suffered of a sudden attack of humorlessness? Or else, are you completely uninterested in photography? What counts is not the size of the entry pupil as such, but the relative size of the entry pupil with respect to the image; that's why in photography we measure aperture as a relative number, say ƒ/2 or ƒ/4. The pupil being 2 or 3 as large means it gathers 4 or 9 times as much light which then falls on a 4 or 9 times as large image area, for an overall identical image brightness. The only net effect is less noise in low light.
                        $endgroup$
                        – AlexP
                        27 mins ago
















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      With a pupil twice or thrice the diameter of a normal human eyes, the eyes of your manga men would harvest from four to eight times the light human eyes do, thus they would hardly be able to tolerate full day light, and would be better nocturnal creatures.



                      As a consequence they would be pale skinned, since melanine wouldn't be needed.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        This is an interesting point. Can we assume that Terrestrial biology is so consistent that we can say the rods and cones wouldn't be desensitized in a larger eye? I'm curious. I'm certain that I'm oversimplifying something awful, but I assume the basic evolutionary trend is, "the most capability with the most protected solution" which means the smallest possible eyes with the greatest possible utility. I think.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Horses have eyes of up to 5cm and dont have immediate problem. Although their pupils do have an alternative shape, it is not impossible for anime eyes to work normally unless you really scale up human eyes to such sizes. But these are ANIME eyes, which can be found on both humans and many anthropomorphological (is that spelled right?) creatures. I see no reason why these anime eyes would be upscaled human eyes.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Demigan
                        1 hour ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Is this answer supposed to be humoristic and I have just suffered of a sudden attack of humorlessness? Or else, are you completely uninterested in photography? What counts is not the size of the entry pupil as such, but the relative size of the entry pupil with respect to the image; that's why in photography we measure aperture as a relative number, say ƒ/2 or ƒ/4. The pupil being 2 or 3 as large means it gathers 4 or 9 times as much light which then falls on a 4 or 9 times as large image area, for an overall identical image brightness. The only net effect is less noise in low light.
                        $endgroup$
                        – AlexP
                        27 mins ago














                      -1












                      -1








                      -1





                      $begingroup$

                      With a pupil twice or thrice the diameter of a normal human eyes, the eyes of your manga men would harvest from four to eight times the light human eyes do, thus they would hardly be able to tolerate full day light, and would be better nocturnal creatures.



                      As a consequence they would be pale skinned, since melanine wouldn't be needed.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      With a pupil twice or thrice the diameter of a normal human eyes, the eyes of your manga men would harvest from four to eight times the light human eyes do, thus they would hardly be able to tolerate full day light, and would be better nocturnal creatures.



                      As a consequence they would be pale skinned, since melanine wouldn't be needed.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 2 hours ago









                      Renan

                      51.8k15119258




                      51.8k15119258










                      answered 2 hours ago









                      L.DutchL.Dutch

                      89.5k29208434




                      89.5k29208434







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        This is an interesting point. Can we assume that Terrestrial biology is so consistent that we can say the rods and cones wouldn't be desensitized in a larger eye? I'm curious. I'm certain that I'm oversimplifying something awful, but I assume the basic evolutionary trend is, "the most capability with the most protected solution" which means the smallest possible eyes with the greatest possible utility. I think.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Horses have eyes of up to 5cm and dont have immediate problem. Although their pupils do have an alternative shape, it is not impossible for anime eyes to work normally unless you really scale up human eyes to such sizes. But these are ANIME eyes, which can be found on both humans and many anthropomorphological (is that spelled right?) creatures. I see no reason why these anime eyes would be upscaled human eyes.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Demigan
                        1 hour ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Is this answer supposed to be humoristic and I have just suffered of a sudden attack of humorlessness? Or else, are you completely uninterested in photography? What counts is not the size of the entry pupil as such, but the relative size of the entry pupil with respect to the image; that's why in photography we measure aperture as a relative number, say ƒ/2 or ƒ/4. The pupil being 2 or 3 as large means it gathers 4 or 9 times as much light which then falls on a 4 or 9 times as large image area, for an overall identical image brightness. The only net effect is less noise in low light.
                        $endgroup$
                        – AlexP
                        27 mins ago













                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        This is an interesting point. Can we assume that Terrestrial biology is so consistent that we can say the rods and cones wouldn't be desensitized in a larger eye? I'm curious. I'm certain that I'm oversimplifying something awful, but I assume the basic evolutionary trend is, "the most capability with the most protected solution" which means the smallest possible eyes with the greatest possible utility. I think.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Horses have eyes of up to 5cm and dont have immediate problem. Although their pupils do have an alternative shape, it is not impossible for anime eyes to work normally unless you really scale up human eyes to such sizes. But these are ANIME eyes, which can be found on both humans and many anthropomorphological (is that spelled right?) creatures. I see no reason why these anime eyes would be upscaled human eyes.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Demigan
                        1 hour ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Is this answer supposed to be humoristic and I have just suffered of a sudden attack of humorlessness? Or else, are you completely uninterested in photography? What counts is not the size of the entry pupil as such, but the relative size of the entry pupil with respect to the image; that's why in photography we measure aperture as a relative number, say ƒ/2 or ƒ/4. The pupil being 2 or 3 as large means it gathers 4 or 9 times as much light which then falls on a 4 or 9 times as large image area, for an overall identical image brightness. The only net effect is less noise in low light.
                        $endgroup$
                        – AlexP
                        27 mins ago








                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      This is an interesting point. Can we assume that Terrestrial biology is so consistent that we can say the rods and cones wouldn't be desensitized in a larger eye? I'm curious. I'm certain that I'm oversimplifying something awful, but I assume the basic evolutionary trend is, "the most capability with the most protected solution" which means the smallest possible eyes with the greatest possible utility. I think.
                      $endgroup$
                      – JBH
                      2 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      This is an interesting point. Can we assume that Terrestrial biology is so consistent that we can say the rods and cones wouldn't be desensitized in a larger eye? I'm curious. I'm certain that I'm oversimplifying something awful, but I assume the basic evolutionary trend is, "the most capability with the most protected solution" which means the smallest possible eyes with the greatest possible utility. I think.
                      $endgroup$
                      – JBH
                      2 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Horses have eyes of up to 5cm and dont have immediate problem. Although their pupils do have an alternative shape, it is not impossible for anime eyes to work normally unless you really scale up human eyes to such sizes. But these are ANIME eyes, which can be found on both humans and many anthropomorphological (is that spelled right?) creatures. I see no reason why these anime eyes would be upscaled human eyes.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Demigan
                      1 hour ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Horses have eyes of up to 5cm and dont have immediate problem. Although their pupils do have an alternative shape, it is not impossible for anime eyes to work normally unless you really scale up human eyes to such sizes. But these are ANIME eyes, which can be found on both humans and many anthropomorphological (is that spelled right?) creatures. I see no reason why these anime eyes would be upscaled human eyes.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Demigan
                      1 hour ago




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Is this answer supposed to be humoristic and I have just suffered of a sudden attack of humorlessness? Or else, are you completely uninterested in photography? What counts is not the size of the entry pupil as such, but the relative size of the entry pupil with respect to the image; that's why in photography we measure aperture as a relative number, say ƒ/2 or ƒ/4. The pupil being 2 or 3 as large means it gathers 4 or 9 times as much light which then falls on a 4 or 9 times as large image area, for an overall identical image brightness. The only net effect is less noise in low light.
                      $endgroup$
                      – AlexP
                      27 mins ago





                      $begingroup$
                      Is this answer supposed to be humoristic and I have just suffered of a sudden attack of humorlessness? Or else, are you completely uninterested in photography? What counts is not the size of the entry pupil as such, but the relative size of the entry pupil with respect to the image; that's why in photography we measure aperture as a relative number, say ƒ/2 or ƒ/4. The pupil being 2 or 3 as large means it gathers 4 or 9 times as much light which then falls on a 4 or 9 times as large image area, for an overall identical image brightness. The only net effect is less noise in low light.
                      $endgroup$
                      – AlexP
                      27 mins ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142887%2fphysiological-effects-of-huge-anime-eyes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

                      Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

                      Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6