Can't figure this one out.. What is the missing box? Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Difficult IQ test question: What is the box suggesting?Mensa IQ test questionMissing number in figureSeemingly difficult culture fair question5008 out of the boxFigure out the missing cardFind the missing boxFind the missing brickFind the missing brick, againShapes and letters. What is the missing box?

Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers

What was Bilhah and Zilpah's ancestry?

What kind of display is this?

Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?

How did the aliens keep their waters separated?

Estimated State payment too big --> money back; + 2018 Tax Reform

Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Need a suitable toxic chemical for a murder plot in my novel

Keep going mode for require-package

How does modal jazz use chord progressions?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Does a C shift expression have unsigned type? Why would Splint warn about a right-shift?

I'm thinking of a number

Direct Experience of Meditation

Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"

Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

How to retrograde a note sequence in Finale?

Statistical model of ligand substitution

Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?

Active filter with series inductor and resistor - do these exist?

Fishing simulator

Slither Like a Snake



Can't figure this one out.. What is the missing box?



Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Difficult IQ test question: What is the box suggesting?Mensa IQ test questionMissing number in figureSeemingly difficult culture fair question5008 out of the boxFigure out the missing cardFind the missing boxFind the missing brickFind the missing brick, againShapes and letters. What is the missing box?










3












$begingroup$


I've been stuck on this for ages, and can't figure this out.



What is the missing box, and the logic behind the answer?



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I was able to come up with the correct answer, and with a much, much simpler reason than the other answers. I'd love to share (and get feedback), it's not worth its own answer and I don't think there's a way to hide spoilers in comments... :(
    $endgroup$
    – Steve
    10 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'll post it as an answer anyway, I can always delete it.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve
    9 mins ago















3












$begingroup$


I've been stuck on this for ages, and can't figure this out.



What is the missing box, and the logic behind the answer?



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I was able to come up with the correct answer, and with a much, much simpler reason than the other answers. I'd love to share (and get feedback), it's not worth its own answer and I don't think there's a way to hide spoilers in comments... :(
    $endgroup$
    – Steve
    10 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'll post it as an answer anyway, I can always delete it.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve
    9 mins ago













3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


I've been stuck on this for ages, and can't figure this out.



What is the missing box, and the logic behind the answer?



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I've been stuck on this for ages, and can't figure this out.



What is the missing box, and the logic behind the answer?



enter image description here







logical-deduction pattern visual geometry progressive-matrix






share|improve this question









New contributor




Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









user477343

3,05511061




3,05511061






New contributor




Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









Rrz0Rrz0

1285




1285




New contributor




Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    I was able to come up with the correct answer, and with a much, much simpler reason than the other answers. I'd love to share (and get feedback), it's not worth its own answer and I don't think there's a way to hide spoilers in comments... :(
    $endgroup$
    – Steve
    10 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'll post it as an answer anyway, I can always delete it.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve
    9 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I was able to come up with the correct answer, and with a much, much simpler reason than the other answers. I'd love to share (and get feedback), it's not worth its own answer and I don't think there's a way to hide spoilers in comments... :(
    $endgroup$
    – Steve
    10 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'll post it as an answer anyway, I can always delete it.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve
    9 mins ago















$begingroup$
I was able to come up with the correct answer, and with a much, much simpler reason than the other answers. I'd love to share (and get feedback), it's not worth its own answer and I don't think there's a way to hide spoilers in comments... :(
$endgroup$
– Steve
10 mins ago




$begingroup$
I was able to come up with the correct answer, and with a much, much simpler reason than the other answers. I'd love to share (and get feedback), it's not worth its own answer and I don't think there's a way to hide spoilers in comments... :(
$endgroup$
– Steve
10 mins ago












$begingroup$
I'll post it as an answer anyway, I can always delete it.
$endgroup$
– Steve
9 mins ago




$begingroup$
I'll post it as an answer anyway, I can always delete it.
$endgroup$
– Steve
9 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

I think the answer is




A




Reasoning:




If you look at each diagonal going from top left to bottom right, there appears to be a pattern of opposing ratios in colour, and corresponding ratios in edges.







Let $rm B : W$ be the ratio of Black shapes to White shapes, then the first diagonal (bottom left corner) is $1 : 3$.

Next diagonal (left middle box and bottom middle box) is $4 : 0$ and $0 : 4$ respectively.

Next diagonal (the middle diagonal with the missing box) have the ratios $1 : 3$ and $3 : 1$, so to me it makes sense that the missing box has a ratio of $1 : 3$.




That leaves either




A or F




Due to how the shapes in these boxes are positioned, I am leaning towards




A




But also, in order to explain the colour scheme...




...it has to do with the edges! Here is how we will count them for each shape:

White circle's edges: 0
Black circle's edges: 1
Donut's edges: 2 (because the outer edge and inner edge are accounted for since the donut is coloured black, because the circle coloured black has its outer edge accounted for as well).
All other shapes have the number of edges you see they have.




And then one last rule:




Every shape corresponds to another shape with 4+ the edges (with alternating colour).




Let me explain:




The top left box has a black circle in the top right and the rest are white circles. That leaves a $1 : 0$ edge ratio (in the same ratio form as $rm B : W$ but not in terms of colour anymore). Therefore, the next box in this diagonal (the middle box) must share this same edge ratio.

All the white circles correspond to black diamonds (white circles have 0 edges, 0 + 4 = 4 so the next shape has 4 edges, and the opposite of white is black, so we have black diamonds). So, in the top left box, we replace the white circles with black diamonds, and then change the black circle to a white pentagon (black circles have 1 edge, 1 + 4 = 5 so the next shape has 5 edges, and the opposite of black is white, so this makes the next shape a white pentagon). Now we can maintain our edge ratio, and violá! Lo and behold the box in the middle!







Top left$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Middle
white circles (0 edges) $to$ black diamonds (0 + 4 edges);
black circles (1 edge) $to$ white pentagons (1 + 4 edges).

Same concept applies for the first parallel diagonals above and below the middle diagonal, if you want to try this pattern with the other boxes!




Get it, now?




Repeating this process in the middle diagonal from our middle box, black diamonds go to white octagons (black 4 $to$ white $8$) and white pentagons go to black nonagons (white 5 $to$ black $9$).







Middle$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Answer A
Recognise the pattern? :)




This is true




for every diagonal. You can count the bottom left corner and top right corner as part of the same diagonal, and the pattern still works.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yay! Thanks @Rrz0 for the $colorgreencheckmark$! It was a nice puzzle :D
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @user477343 for the time you took to solve the puzzle.
    $endgroup$
    – Rrz0
    50 mins ago


















1












$begingroup$

Thank you @user477343 for solving the puzzle.



I found another(?) pattern. In general the puzzle above follows 2 simple rules:



Rule 1:




Each box increases in the number of shaded shapes in a clock-wise fashion. When all four shapes are shaded, each following box increases in the number of un-shaded shapes in a clock-wise manner.




Let us take the shaded circle in box 1 is the starting point.




(Square 1 to 4) and then decreases the number of shaded shapes (square 5 to 8) in a >!clock-wise manner. Therefore, by simply following this rule, the answer would be A
since it has one shaded shape, which is also in the correct starting position.




Rule 2:




With each increase in shaded shape, there is an also an increase in the number of >!sides (+1) that the newly shaded shapes have.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Rrz0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81760%2fcant-figure-this-one-out-what-is-the-missing-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    I think the answer is




    A




    Reasoning:




    If you look at each diagonal going from top left to bottom right, there appears to be a pattern of opposing ratios in colour, and corresponding ratios in edges.







    Let $rm B : W$ be the ratio of Black shapes to White shapes, then the first diagonal (bottom left corner) is $1 : 3$.

    Next diagonal (left middle box and bottom middle box) is $4 : 0$ and $0 : 4$ respectively.

    Next diagonal (the middle diagonal with the missing box) have the ratios $1 : 3$ and $3 : 1$, so to me it makes sense that the missing box has a ratio of $1 : 3$.




    That leaves either




    A or F




    Due to how the shapes in these boxes are positioned, I am leaning towards




    A




    But also, in order to explain the colour scheme...




    ...it has to do with the edges! Here is how we will count them for each shape:

    White circle's edges: 0
    Black circle's edges: 1
    Donut's edges: 2 (because the outer edge and inner edge are accounted for since the donut is coloured black, because the circle coloured black has its outer edge accounted for as well).
    All other shapes have the number of edges you see they have.




    And then one last rule:




    Every shape corresponds to another shape with 4+ the edges (with alternating colour).




    Let me explain:




    The top left box has a black circle in the top right and the rest are white circles. That leaves a $1 : 0$ edge ratio (in the same ratio form as $rm B : W$ but not in terms of colour anymore). Therefore, the next box in this diagonal (the middle box) must share this same edge ratio.

    All the white circles correspond to black diamonds (white circles have 0 edges, 0 + 4 = 4 so the next shape has 4 edges, and the opposite of white is black, so we have black diamonds). So, in the top left box, we replace the white circles with black diamonds, and then change the black circle to a white pentagon (black circles have 1 edge, 1 + 4 = 5 so the next shape has 5 edges, and the opposite of black is white, so this makes the next shape a white pentagon). Now we can maintain our edge ratio, and violá! Lo and behold the box in the middle!







    Top left$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Middle
    white circles (0 edges) $to$ black diamonds (0 + 4 edges);
    black circles (1 edge) $to$ white pentagons (1 + 4 edges).

    Same concept applies for the first parallel diagonals above and below the middle diagonal, if you want to try this pattern with the other boxes!




    Get it, now?




    Repeating this process in the middle diagonal from our middle box, black diamonds go to white octagons (black 4 $to$ white $8$) and white pentagons go to black nonagons (white 5 $to$ black $9$).







    Middle$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Answer A
    Recognise the pattern? :)




    This is true




    for every diagonal. You can count the bottom left corner and top right corner as part of the same diagonal, and the pattern still works.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yay! Thanks @Rrz0 for the $colorgreencheckmark$! It was a nice puzzle :D
      $endgroup$
      – user477343
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you @user477343 for the time you took to solve the puzzle.
      $endgroup$
      – Rrz0
      50 mins ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    I think the answer is




    A




    Reasoning:




    If you look at each diagonal going from top left to bottom right, there appears to be a pattern of opposing ratios in colour, and corresponding ratios in edges.







    Let $rm B : W$ be the ratio of Black shapes to White shapes, then the first diagonal (bottom left corner) is $1 : 3$.

    Next diagonal (left middle box and bottom middle box) is $4 : 0$ and $0 : 4$ respectively.

    Next diagonal (the middle diagonal with the missing box) have the ratios $1 : 3$ and $3 : 1$, so to me it makes sense that the missing box has a ratio of $1 : 3$.




    That leaves either




    A or F




    Due to how the shapes in these boxes are positioned, I am leaning towards




    A




    But also, in order to explain the colour scheme...




    ...it has to do with the edges! Here is how we will count them for each shape:

    White circle's edges: 0
    Black circle's edges: 1
    Donut's edges: 2 (because the outer edge and inner edge are accounted for since the donut is coloured black, because the circle coloured black has its outer edge accounted for as well).
    All other shapes have the number of edges you see they have.




    And then one last rule:




    Every shape corresponds to another shape with 4+ the edges (with alternating colour).




    Let me explain:




    The top left box has a black circle in the top right and the rest are white circles. That leaves a $1 : 0$ edge ratio (in the same ratio form as $rm B : W$ but not in terms of colour anymore). Therefore, the next box in this diagonal (the middle box) must share this same edge ratio.

    All the white circles correspond to black diamonds (white circles have 0 edges, 0 + 4 = 4 so the next shape has 4 edges, and the opposite of white is black, so we have black diamonds). So, in the top left box, we replace the white circles with black diamonds, and then change the black circle to a white pentagon (black circles have 1 edge, 1 + 4 = 5 so the next shape has 5 edges, and the opposite of black is white, so this makes the next shape a white pentagon). Now we can maintain our edge ratio, and violá! Lo and behold the box in the middle!







    Top left$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Middle
    white circles (0 edges) $to$ black diamonds (0 + 4 edges);
    black circles (1 edge) $to$ white pentagons (1 + 4 edges).

    Same concept applies for the first parallel diagonals above and below the middle diagonal, if you want to try this pattern with the other boxes!




    Get it, now?




    Repeating this process in the middle diagonal from our middle box, black diamonds go to white octagons (black 4 $to$ white $8$) and white pentagons go to black nonagons (white 5 $to$ black $9$).







    Middle$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Answer A
    Recognise the pattern? :)




    This is true




    for every diagonal. You can count the bottom left corner and top right corner as part of the same diagonal, and the pattern still works.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yay! Thanks @Rrz0 for the $colorgreencheckmark$! It was a nice puzzle :D
      $endgroup$
      – user477343
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you @user477343 for the time you took to solve the puzzle.
      $endgroup$
      – Rrz0
      50 mins ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    I think the answer is




    A




    Reasoning:




    If you look at each diagonal going from top left to bottom right, there appears to be a pattern of opposing ratios in colour, and corresponding ratios in edges.







    Let $rm B : W$ be the ratio of Black shapes to White shapes, then the first diagonal (bottom left corner) is $1 : 3$.

    Next diagonal (left middle box and bottom middle box) is $4 : 0$ and $0 : 4$ respectively.

    Next diagonal (the middle diagonal with the missing box) have the ratios $1 : 3$ and $3 : 1$, so to me it makes sense that the missing box has a ratio of $1 : 3$.




    That leaves either




    A or F




    Due to how the shapes in these boxes are positioned, I am leaning towards




    A




    But also, in order to explain the colour scheme...




    ...it has to do with the edges! Here is how we will count them for each shape:

    White circle's edges: 0
    Black circle's edges: 1
    Donut's edges: 2 (because the outer edge and inner edge are accounted for since the donut is coloured black, because the circle coloured black has its outer edge accounted for as well).
    All other shapes have the number of edges you see they have.




    And then one last rule:




    Every shape corresponds to another shape with 4+ the edges (with alternating colour).




    Let me explain:




    The top left box has a black circle in the top right and the rest are white circles. That leaves a $1 : 0$ edge ratio (in the same ratio form as $rm B : W$ but not in terms of colour anymore). Therefore, the next box in this diagonal (the middle box) must share this same edge ratio.

    All the white circles correspond to black diamonds (white circles have 0 edges, 0 + 4 = 4 so the next shape has 4 edges, and the opposite of white is black, so we have black diamonds). So, in the top left box, we replace the white circles with black diamonds, and then change the black circle to a white pentagon (black circles have 1 edge, 1 + 4 = 5 so the next shape has 5 edges, and the opposite of black is white, so this makes the next shape a white pentagon). Now we can maintain our edge ratio, and violá! Lo and behold the box in the middle!







    Top left$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Middle
    white circles (0 edges) $to$ black diamonds (0 + 4 edges);
    black circles (1 edge) $to$ white pentagons (1 + 4 edges).

    Same concept applies for the first parallel diagonals above and below the middle diagonal, if you want to try this pattern with the other boxes!




    Get it, now?




    Repeating this process in the middle diagonal from our middle box, black diamonds go to white octagons (black 4 $to$ white $8$) and white pentagons go to black nonagons (white 5 $to$ black $9$).







    Middle$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Answer A
    Recognise the pattern? :)




    This is true




    for every diagonal. You can count the bottom left corner and top right corner as part of the same diagonal, and the pattern still works.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I think the answer is




    A




    Reasoning:




    If you look at each diagonal going from top left to bottom right, there appears to be a pattern of opposing ratios in colour, and corresponding ratios in edges.







    Let $rm B : W$ be the ratio of Black shapes to White shapes, then the first diagonal (bottom left corner) is $1 : 3$.

    Next diagonal (left middle box and bottom middle box) is $4 : 0$ and $0 : 4$ respectively.

    Next diagonal (the middle diagonal with the missing box) have the ratios $1 : 3$ and $3 : 1$, so to me it makes sense that the missing box has a ratio of $1 : 3$.




    That leaves either




    A or F




    Due to how the shapes in these boxes are positioned, I am leaning towards




    A




    But also, in order to explain the colour scheme...




    ...it has to do with the edges! Here is how we will count them for each shape:

    White circle's edges: 0
    Black circle's edges: 1
    Donut's edges: 2 (because the outer edge and inner edge are accounted for since the donut is coloured black, because the circle coloured black has its outer edge accounted for as well).
    All other shapes have the number of edges you see they have.




    And then one last rule:




    Every shape corresponds to another shape with 4+ the edges (with alternating colour).




    Let me explain:




    The top left box has a black circle in the top right and the rest are white circles. That leaves a $1 : 0$ edge ratio (in the same ratio form as $rm B : W$ but not in terms of colour anymore). Therefore, the next box in this diagonal (the middle box) must share this same edge ratio.

    All the white circles correspond to black diamonds (white circles have 0 edges, 0 + 4 = 4 so the next shape has 4 edges, and the opposite of white is black, so we have black diamonds). So, in the top left box, we replace the white circles with black diamonds, and then change the black circle to a white pentagon (black circles have 1 edge, 1 + 4 = 5 so the next shape has 5 edges, and the opposite of black is white, so this makes the next shape a white pentagon). Now we can maintain our edge ratio, and violá! Lo and behold the box in the middle!







    Top left$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Middle
    white circles (0 edges) $to$ black diamonds (0 + 4 edges);
    black circles (1 edge) $to$ white pentagons (1 + 4 edges).

    Same concept applies for the first parallel diagonals above and below the middle diagonal, if you want to try this pattern with the other boxes!




    Get it, now?




    Repeating this process in the middle diagonal from our middle box, black diamonds go to white octagons (black 4 $to$ white $8$) and white pentagons go to black nonagons (white 5 $to$ black $9$).







    Middle$LARGEstackrelimpliesvphantomprod_n=1^Uparrow$ Answer A
    Recognise the pattern? :)




    This is true




    for every diagonal. You can count the bottom left corner and top right corner as part of the same diagonal, and the pattern still works.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 5 hours ago









    user477343user477343

    3,05511061




    3,05511061







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yay! Thanks @Rrz0 for the $colorgreencheckmark$! It was a nice puzzle :D
      $endgroup$
      – user477343
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you @user477343 for the time you took to solve the puzzle.
      $endgroup$
      – Rrz0
      50 mins ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yay! Thanks @Rrz0 for the $colorgreencheckmark$! It was a nice puzzle :D
      $endgroup$
      – user477343
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you @user477343 for the time you took to solve the puzzle.
      $endgroup$
      – Rrz0
      50 mins ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Yay! Thanks @Rrz0 for the $colorgreencheckmark$! It was a nice puzzle :D
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Yay! Thanks @Rrz0 for the $colorgreencheckmark$! It was a nice puzzle :D
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Thank you @user477343 for the time you took to solve the puzzle.
    $endgroup$
    – Rrz0
    50 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you @user477343 for the time you took to solve the puzzle.
    $endgroup$
    – Rrz0
    50 mins ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    Thank you @user477343 for solving the puzzle.



    I found another(?) pattern. In general the puzzle above follows 2 simple rules:



    Rule 1:




    Each box increases in the number of shaded shapes in a clock-wise fashion. When all four shapes are shaded, each following box increases in the number of un-shaded shapes in a clock-wise manner.




    Let us take the shaded circle in box 1 is the starting point.




    (Square 1 to 4) and then decreases the number of shaded shapes (square 5 to 8) in a >!clock-wise manner. Therefore, by simply following this rule, the answer would be A
    since it has one shaded shape, which is also in the correct starting position.




    Rule 2:




    With each increase in shaded shape, there is an also an increase in the number of >!sides (+1) that the newly shaded shapes have.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Thank you @user477343 for solving the puzzle.



      I found another(?) pattern. In general the puzzle above follows 2 simple rules:



      Rule 1:




      Each box increases in the number of shaded shapes in a clock-wise fashion. When all four shapes are shaded, each following box increases in the number of un-shaded shapes in a clock-wise manner.




      Let us take the shaded circle in box 1 is the starting point.




      (Square 1 to 4) and then decreases the number of shaded shapes (square 5 to 8) in a >!clock-wise manner. Therefore, by simply following this rule, the answer would be A
      since it has one shaded shape, which is also in the correct starting position.




      Rule 2:




      With each increase in shaded shape, there is an also an increase in the number of >!sides (+1) that the newly shaded shapes have.







      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Thank you @user477343 for solving the puzzle.



        I found another(?) pattern. In general the puzzle above follows 2 simple rules:



        Rule 1:




        Each box increases in the number of shaded shapes in a clock-wise fashion. When all four shapes are shaded, each following box increases in the number of un-shaded shapes in a clock-wise manner.




        Let us take the shaded circle in box 1 is the starting point.




        (Square 1 to 4) and then decreases the number of shaded shapes (square 5 to 8) in a >!clock-wise manner. Therefore, by simply following this rule, the answer would be A
        since it has one shaded shape, which is also in the correct starting position.




        Rule 2:




        With each increase in shaded shape, there is an also an increase in the number of >!sides (+1) that the newly shaded shapes have.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        Thank you @user477343 for solving the puzzle.



        I found another(?) pattern. In general the puzzle above follows 2 simple rules:



        Rule 1:




        Each box increases in the number of shaded shapes in a clock-wise fashion. When all four shapes are shaded, each following box increases in the number of un-shaded shapes in a clock-wise manner.




        Let us take the shaded circle in box 1 is the starting point.




        (Square 1 to 4) and then decreases the number of shaded shapes (square 5 to 8) in a >!clock-wise manner. Therefore, by simply following this rule, the answer would be A
        since it has one shaded shape, which is also in the correct starting position.




        Rule 2:




        With each increase in shaded shape, there is an also an increase in the number of >!sides (+1) that the newly shaded shapes have.








        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 43 mins ago









        Rrz0Rrz0

        1285




        1285




        New contributor




        Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Rrz0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            Rrz0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Rrz0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Rrz0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Rrz0 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81760%2fcant-figure-this-one-out-what-is-the-missing-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

            Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

            Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager