Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack? Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do insects decrease aircraft performance?How to draw NACA 6-Series Airfoils?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?What is the relation between the Lift Coefficient and the Angle of Attack?Is it possible to fly horizontally with zero angle of attack?How to find trim condition of a sectional airfoil without knowing the angle of attack?What is the effect of flow separation on lift, pressure distribution and drag?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?Do negative angles-of-attack create lift?How do you calculate the lift coefficient of an airfoil at zero angle of attack?Calculating induced drag approximation using XFoil generated parasitic dragDoes speed or angle of attack generally have the greatest impact on total induced drag?What's the theoretical background of the critical angle of attack?

What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?

Area of a 2D convex hull

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Estimated State payment too big --> money back; + 2018 Tax Reform

Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

Can a monk deflect thrown melee weapons?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

What is the electric potential inside a point charge?

Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack?

What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?

How to say 'striped' in Latin

Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?

If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?

Statistical model of ligand substitution

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

Need a suitable toxic chemical for a murder plot in my novel

Biased dice probability question

When is phishing education going too far?

90's book, teen horror

What is the order of Mitzvot in Rambam's Sefer Hamitzvot?

How does modal jazz use chord progressions?



Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack?



Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do insects decrease aircraft performance?How to draw NACA 6-Series Airfoils?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?What is the relation between the Lift Coefficient and the Angle of Attack?Is it possible to fly horizontally with zero angle of attack?How to find trim condition of a sectional airfoil without knowing the angle of attack?What is the effect of flow separation on lift, pressure distribution and drag?How can the zero-lift drag coefficient (parasitic drag) be calculated?Do negative angles-of-attack create lift?How do you calculate the lift coefficient of an airfoil at zero angle of attack?Calculating induced drag approximation using XFoil generated parasitic dragDoes speed or angle of attack generally have the greatest impact on total induced drag?What's the theoretical background of the critical angle of attack?










1












$begingroup$


The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.










share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    6 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.










share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    6 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.










share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




The drag coefficient of a symmetric airfoil is lowest when its angle of attack is zero. I'm not sure if this is true in general.







aerodynamics airfoil drag angle-of-attack






share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









simple jacksimple jack

103




103




New contributor




simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






simple jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Av.SE!
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



flap polar



This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



    The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



    $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



    For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
      $endgroup$
      – simple jack
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Kämpf
      2 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "528"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62357%2fis-drag-coefficient-lowest-at-zero-angle-of-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



    However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



    flap polar



    This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



    What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



    The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



    Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



    If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



      However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



      flap polar



      This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



      What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



      The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



      Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



      If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



        However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



        flap polar



        This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



        What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



        The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



        Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



        If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Obviously, drag should be smallest for symmetrical airfoils at zero angle of attack.



        However, most airfoils have camber, and then the lowest drag is at positive lift coefficients in case of positive camber. Where that point is exactly depends on many parameters; in case of laminar airfoils even local imperfections can have a noticeable effect. Generally, the lowest drag can be found at the angle of attack where the stagnation point is exactly at the center of the leading edge, where the local curvature is highest. A deviation from this point will force the flow on one side to negotiate this point of highest curvature all by itself, resulting in a suction peak which will increase the losses in the boundary layer.



        flap polar



        This is a theoretical drag polar (calculated with XFOIL) of an airfoil with a 20% camber flap at different settings and a Reynolds number of 1.5 million. The laminar bucket is clearly visible and produces a range of lift coefficients with nearly identical drag. The small waviness at the lower end of the laminar bucket is an artificial result of smoothing the plot.



        What is obvious is how camber shifts the area of minimum drag up and down. If you use the right side of the plot to find the angle of attack of minimum drag, you will find that this is not constant but goes down as flap angles go up. For the 0° flap polar it is at about -2° AoA. This is caused by the induced angle of attack which increases with the lift coefficient.



        The 6-series NACA airfoils were the first to be systematically designed with the pressure distribution in mind, and the design lift coefficient is where the condition of the ideal stagnation point location is met. This is indicated by the digit right after the hyphen in the airfoil name: Divide this digit by 10 and you have the lift coefficient of minimum drag.



        Example: The $63_1-412$ airfoil has its lowest drag at a lift coefficient of 0.4.



        If you want to know the angle of attack with the lowest drag of a whole airplane, this is a very different matter and needs to include the drag due to lift, which is of course smallest at the zero lift polar point.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Peter KämpfPeter Kämpf

        162k12411656




        162k12411656





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



            The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



            $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



            For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
              $endgroup$
              – simple jack
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kämpf
              2 hours ago















            0












            $begingroup$

            Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



            The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



            $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



            For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
              $endgroup$
              – simple jack
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kämpf
              2 hours ago













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



            The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



            $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



            For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Yes, for a symmetrical lift generating airfoil this is true.



            The drag coefficient is computed by dividing the wetted area $A_w$ of the airfoil by its frontal area $A_f$ :



            $$ c_d = fracA_wA_f $$



            For non-symmetrical airfoils, the lowest drag coefficient is found at the angle of attack were the frontal area is at its smallest. For almost all the airfoils this is at 0 degrees AoA.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago









            simple jack

            103




            103










            answered 6 hours ago









            BrilsmurfffjeBrilsmurfffje

            3,41621536




            3,41621536











            • $begingroup$
              It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
              $endgroup$
              – simple jack
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kämpf
              2 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
              $endgroup$
              – simple jack
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kämpf
              2 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
            $endgroup$
            – simple jack
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            It is not true for the Clark-Y airfoil.
            $endgroup$
            – simple jack
            5 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Kämpf
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Frontal area is smallest? April 1st was two weeks ago!
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Kämpf
            2 hours ago










            simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            simple jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62357%2fis-drag-coefficient-lowest-at-zero-angle-of-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

            Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

            Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager