Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to determine whether a sequence of functions converges uniformly or pointwise to a function?Is $z=x^2+y^2$ a bijection?Identify as an injection, surjection, bijection or non-functionDetermine whether each of these functions is a bijection from R to RWhat is the mistake in this proof?Determine Total/Partial Functions and Injection/Surjection/BijectionExplaining whether a function is injective/surjection ($fcolonBbb Nto P(Bbb N)$)Is this a surjection? (Elementary real analysis)Help on Surjection, Injection, and BijectionFunction One to One with coordinates

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Estimated State payment too big --> money back; + 2018 Tax Reform

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

What's the difference between (size_t)-1 and ~0?

If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?

How did the aliens keep their waters separated?

How to add zeros to reach same number of decimal places in tables?

If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"

Does a C shift expression have unsigned type? Why would Splint warn about a right-shift?

What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?

Why did AF447 never return to normal law?

Limit for e and 1/e

Estimate capacitor parameters

Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection

Extraordinarily Forgoes Anthem

Stars Make Stars

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

What kind of display is this?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

What causes relative frequency of consonants?

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"

Who can trigger ship-wide alerts in Star Trek?



Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to determine whether a sequence of functions converges uniformly or pointwise to a function?Is $z=x^2+y^2$ a bijection?Identify as an injection, surjection, bijection or non-functionDetermine whether each of these functions is a bijection from R to RWhat is the mistake in this proof?Determine Total/Partial Functions and Injection/Surjection/BijectionExplaining whether a function is injective/surjection ($fcolonBbb Nto P(Bbb N)$)Is this a surjection? (Elementary real analysis)Help on Surjection, Injection, and BijectionFunction One to One with coordinates










2












$begingroup$


Let $P=p(x)$ $. Define $f : Prightarrow P$ where $f(p(x)) =p'(x)$, the derivative of $p(x)$.



Determine whether $f$ is a function, an injection, a surjection, a bijection.



Now I have the solutions, and I understand that it is a function because each polynomial has a unique derivative. And it is not an injection as the antiderivative of a given polynomial is not unique.



However, I do not understand the book's solution for determining whether it is a surjection, nor am I able to come up with one myself. In all honesty, I think I am having trouble understanding the mapping from P to P. The solution states that it is a surjection. Why is this so?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This problem doesn't make sense. If $deg p(x)=n$, then $deg p'(x)=n-1$ and therefore, $p'(x)notin P$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    52 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is $P$ the set of polynomials of degree $n$ exactly?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    52 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I interpreted it to mean that it is the set of all polynomials.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    50 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think he means the set of nonzero polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    49 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I read it more as the set of "all polynomials with degree that is a nonnegative integer." Though I do wonder of the need to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    48 mins ago















2












$begingroup$


Let $P=p(x)$ $. Define $f : Prightarrow P$ where $f(p(x)) =p'(x)$, the derivative of $p(x)$.



Determine whether $f$ is a function, an injection, a surjection, a bijection.



Now I have the solutions, and I understand that it is a function because each polynomial has a unique derivative. And it is not an injection as the antiderivative of a given polynomial is not unique.



However, I do not understand the book's solution for determining whether it is a surjection, nor am I able to come up with one myself. In all honesty, I think I am having trouble understanding the mapping from P to P. The solution states that it is a surjection. Why is this so?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This problem doesn't make sense. If $deg p(x)=n$, then $deg p'(x)=n-1$ and therefore, $p'(x)notin P$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    52 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is $P$ the set of polynomials of degree $n$ exactly?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    52 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I interpreted it to mean that it is the set of all polynomials.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    50 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think he means the set of nonzero polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    49 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I read it more as the set of "all polynomials with degree that is a nonnegative integer." Though I do wonder of the need to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    48 mins ago













2












2








2


0



$begingroup$


Let $P=p(x)$ $. Define $f : Prightarrow P$ where $f(p(x)) =p'(x)$, the derivative of $p(x)$.



Determine whether $f$ is a function, an injection, a surjection, a bijection.



Now I have the solutions, and I understand that it is a function because each polynomial has a unique derivative. And it is not an injection as the antiderivative of a given polynomial is not unique.



However, I do not understand the book's solution for determining whether it is a surjection, nor am I able to come up with one myself. In all honesty, I think I am having trouble understanding the mapping from P to P. The solution states that it is a surjection. Why is this so?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $P=p(x)$ $. Define $f : Prightarrow P$ where $f(p(x)) =p'(x)$, the derivative of $p(x)$.



Determine whether $f$ is a function, an injection, a surjection, a bijection.



Now I have the solutions, and I understand that it is a function because each polynomial has a unique derivative. And it is not an injection as the antiderivative of a given polynomial is not unique.



However, I do not understand the book's solution for determining whether it is a surjection, nor am I able to come up with one myself. In all honesty, I think I am having trouble understanding the mapping from P to P. The solution states that it is a surjection. Why is this so?







calculus functions derivatives elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 57 mins ago









John ArgJohn Arg

496




496











  • $begingroup$
    This problem doesn't make sense. If $deg p(x)=n$, then $deg p'(x)=n-1$ and therefore, $p'(x)notin P$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    52 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is $P$ the set of polynomials of degree $n$ exactly?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    52 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I interpreted it to mean that it is the set of all polynomials.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    50 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think he means the set of nonzero polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    49 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I read it more as the set of "all polynomials with degree that is a nonnegative integer." Though I do wonder of the need to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    48 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This problem doesn't make sense. If $deg p(x)=n$, then $deg p'(x)=n-1$ and therefore, $p'(x)notin P$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    52 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is $P$ the set of polynomials of degree $n$ exactly?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    52 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I interpreted it to mean that it is the set of all polynomials.
    $endgroup$
    – Tony S.F.
    50 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think he means the set of nonzero polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    49 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I read it more as the set of "all polynomials with degree that is a nonnegative integer." Though I do wonder of the need to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    48 mins ago















$begingroup$
This problem doesn't make sense. If $deg p(x)=n$, then $deg p'(x)=n-1$ and therefore, $p'(x)notin P$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
52 mins ago




$begingroup$
This problem doesn't make sense. If $deg p(x)=n$, then $deg p'(x)=n-1$ and therefore, $p'(x)notin P$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
52 mins ago












$begingroup$
Is $P$ the set of polynomials of degree $n$ exactly?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
52 mins ago




$begingroup$
Is $P$ the set of polynomials of degree $n$ exactly?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
52 mins ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I interpreted it to mean that it is the set of all polynomials.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
50 mins ago




$begingroup$
I interpreted it to mean that it is the set of all polynomials.
$endgroup$
– Tony S.F.
50 mins ago












$begingroup$
I think he means the set of nonzero polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
49 mins ago




$begingroup$
I think he means the set of nonzero polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
49 mins ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I read it more as the set of "all polynomials with degree that is a nonnegative integer." Though I do wonder of the need to specify that.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
48 mins ago




$begingroup$
I read it more as the set of "all polynomials with degree that is a nonnegative integer." Though I do wonder of the need to specify that.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
48 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

To see that $f$ is a surjection we take an arbitrary element $y$ in $P$ and show that $exists xin P$ such that $f(x)=y$. This is what it means to be surjective; we cover the entire space with the image of $f$ on $P$.



Let $pin P$, i.e. $p$ is some polynomial $p(x)$. Then $p(x)$ has an antiderivative, $q(x) = int p(x)dx$. This antiderivative is a polynomial (easy to check), so it is in $P$. Then $f(q) = p$, and since $p$ was arbitrary, $f$ is therefore surjective.



Here is a more concrete analogy to help you understand what a surjection is.



Imagine you have two lists of names, one for adults and one for children. Imagine that someone says they have a way to assign names from the adult list to names in children list. Their way of assigning the names is surjective if every name is the children list is assigned at least one name in the adult list. This would mean that if you pick a name from the children list as random, there is at least one adult name corresponding to it.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This is exactly the solution presented in my book (albeit reworded) yet for some reason I am having trouble understanding it. It seems to be that I am having a problem with the first two lines. Perhaps I do not properly understand what surjection is?
    $endgroup$
    – John Arg
    41 mins ago


















1












$begingroup$

For any polynomial $p (x) $ there exists its integral $P (x) $, for which $p $ is a derivative: $$p (x)=P'(x)$$ hence each $p(x) in P$ is in the image of your function. Then it is surjective.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Think about what the inverse mapping for $f$ would be if indeed it would be a surjection: it would take the derivatives to the original function. Phrased another way, it would take a function to its antiderivative, right?



    Well, we know that all polynomials have an antiderivative (which is itself a polynomial), and since the codomain of $f$ is basically the set of real polynomials, we have a pre-image for each polynomial in $P$ - its antiderivative. Thus, $f$ is surjective.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      What do you mean by pre-image?
      $endgroup$
      – John Arg
      43 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      You know how, say, $f(x)$ might be called the "image" for $x$? Same sort of deal: we would also say $x$ is the pre-image for $f(x)$. To use, arguably, more familiar terminology: inputs are to outputs, as pre-images are to images.
      $endgroup$
      – Eevee Trainer
      42 mins ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187852%2fdetermine-whether-f-is-a-function-an-injection-a-surjection%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    To see that $f$ is a surjection we take an arbitrary element $y$ in $P$ and show that $exists xin P$ such that $f(x)=y$. This is what it means to be surjective; we cover the entire space with the image of $f$ on $P$.



    Let $pin P$, i.e. $p$ is some polynomial $p(x)$. Then $p(x)$ has an antiderivative, $q(x) = int p(x)dx$. This antiderivative is a polynomial (easy to check), so it is in $P$. Then $f(q) = p$, and since $p$ was arbitrary, $f$ is therefore surjective.



    Here is a more concrete analogy to help you understand what a surjection is.



    Imagine you have two lists of names, one for adults and one for children. Imagine that someone says they have a way to assign names from the adult list to names in children list. Their way of assigning the names is surjective if every name is the children list is assigned at least one name in the adult list. This would mean that if you pick a name from the children list as random, there is at least one adult name corresponding to it.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      This is exactly the solution presented in my book (albeit reworded) yet for some reason I am having trouble understanding it. It seems to be that I am having a problem with the first two lines. Perhaps I do not properly understand what surjection is?
      $endgroup$
      – John Arg
      41 mins ago















    5












    $begingroup$

    To see that $f$ is a surjection we take an arbitrary element $y$ in $P$ and show that $exists xin P$ such that $f(x)=y$. This is what it means to be surjective; we cover the entire space with the image of $f$ on $P$.



    Let $pin P$, i.e. $p$ is some polynomial $p(x)$. Then $p(x)$ has an antiderivative, $q(x) = int p(x)dx$. This antiderivative is a polynomial (easy to check), so it is in $P$. Then $f(q) = p$, and since $p$ was arbitrary, $f$ is therefore surjective.



    Here is a more concrete analogy to help you understand what a surjection is.



    Imagine you have two lists of names, one for adults and one for children. Imagine that someone says they have a way to assign names from the adult list to names in children list. Their way of assigning the names is surjective if every name is the children list is assigned at least one name in the adult list. This would mean that if you pick a name from the children list as random, there is at least one adult name corresponding to it.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      This is exactly the solution presented in my book (albeit reworded) yet for some reason I am having trouble understanding it. It seems to be that I am having a problem with the first two lines. Perhaps I do not properly understand what surjection is?
      $endgroup$
      – John Arg
      41 mins ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    To see that $f$ is a surjection we take an arbitrary element $y$ in $P$ and show that $exists xin P$ such that $f(x)=y$. This is what it means to be surjective; we cover the entire space with the image of $f$ on $P$.



    Let $pin P$, i.e. $p$ is some polynomial $p(x)$. Then $p(x)$ has an antiderivative, $q(x) = int p(x)dx$. This antiderivative is a polynomial (easy to check), so it is in $P$. Then $f(q) = p$, and since $p$ was arbitrary, $f$ is therefore surjective.



    Here is a more concrete analogy to help you understand what a surjection is.



    Imagine you have two lists of names, one for adults and one for children. Imagine that someone says they have a way to assign names from the adult list to names in children list. Their way of assigning the names is surjective if every name is the children list is assigned at least one name in the adult list. This would mean that if you pick a name from the children list as random, there is at least one adult name corresponding to it.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    To see that $f$ is a surjection we take an arbitrary element $y$ in $P$ and show that $exists xin P$ such that $f(x)=y$. This is what it means to be surjective; we cover the entire space with the image of $f$ on $P$.



    Let $pin P$, i.e. $p$ is some polynomial $p(x)$. Then $p(x)$ has an antiderivative, $q(x) = int p(x)dx$. This antiderivative is a polynomial (easy to check), so it is in $P$. Then $f(q) = p$, and since $p$ was arbitrary, $f$ is therefore surjective.



    Here is a more concrete analogy to help you understand what a surjection is.



    Imagine you have two lists of names, one for adults and one for children. Imagine that someone says they have a way to assign names from the adult list to names in children list. Their way of assigning the names is surjective if every name is the children list is assigned at least one name in the adult list. This would mean that if you pick a name from the children list as random, there is at least one adult name corresponding to it.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 37 mins ago

























    answered 51 mins ago









    Tony S.F.Tony S.F.

    3,72421031




    3,72421031











    • $begingroup$
      This is exactly the solution presented in my book (albeit reworded) yet for some reason I am having trouble understanding it. It seems to be that I am having a problem with the first two lines. Perhaps I do not properly understand what surjection is?
      $endgroup$
      – John Arg
      41 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      This is exactly the solution presented in my book (albeit reworded) yet for some reason I am having trouble understanding it. It seems to be that I am having a problem with the first two lines. Perhaps I do not properly understand what surjection is?
      $endgroup$
      – John Arg
      41 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    This is exactly the solution presented in my book (albeit reworded) yet for some reason I am having trouble understanding it. It seems to be that I am having a problem with the first two lines. Perhaps I do not properly understand what surjection is?
    $endgroup$
    – John Arg
    41 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    This is exactly the solution presented in my book (albeit reworded) yet for some reason I am having trouble understanding it. It seems to be that I am having a problem with the first two lines. Perhaps I do not properly understand what surjection is?
    $endgroup$
    – John Arg
    41 mins ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    For any polynomial $p (x) $ there exists its integral $P (x) $, for which $p $ is a derivative: $$p (x)=P'(x)$$ hence each $p(x) in P$ is in the image of your function. Then it is surjective.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      For any polynomial $p (x) $ there exists its integral $P (x) $, for which $p $ is a derivative: $$p (x)=P'(x)$$ hence each $p(x) in P$ is in the image of your function. Then it is surjective.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        For any polynomial $p (x) $ there exists its integral $P (x) $, for which $p $ is a derivative: $$p (x)=P'(x)$$ hence each $p(x) in P$ is in the image of your function. Then it is surjective.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        For any polynomial $p (x) $ there exists its integral $P (x) $, for which $p $ is a derivative: $$p (x)=P'(x)$$ hence each $p(x) in P$ is in the image of your function. Then it is surjective.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 40 mins ago









        CiaPanCiaPan

        10.3k11248




        10.3k11248





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Think about what the inverse mapping for $f$ would be if indeed it would be a surjection: it would take the derivatives to the original function. Phrased another way, it would take a function to its antiderivative, right?



            Well, we know that all polynomials have an antiderivative (which is itself a polynomial), and since the codomain of $f$ is basically the set of real polynomials, we have a pre-image for each polynomial in $P$ - its antiderivative. Thus, $f$ is surjective.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by pre-image?
              $endgroup$
              – John Arg
              43 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              You know how, say, $f(x)$ might be called the "image" for $x$? Same sort of deal: we would also say $x$ is the pre-image for $f(x)$. To use, arguably, more familiar terminology: inputs are to outputs, as pre-images are to images.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              42 mins ago















            0












            $begingroup$

            Think about what the inverse mapping for $f$ would be if indeed it would be a surjection: it would take the derivatives to the original function. Phrased another way, it would take a function to its antiderivative, right?



            Well, we know that all polynomials have an antiderivative (which is itself a polynomial), and since the codomain of $f$ is basically the set of real polynomials, we have a pre-image for each polynomial in $P$ - its antiderivative. Thus, $f$ is surjective.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by pre-image?
              $endgroup$
              – John Arg
              43 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              You know how, say, $f(x)$ might be called the "image" for $x$? Same sort of deal: we would also say $x$ is the pre-image for $f(x)$. To use, arguably, more familiar terminology: inputs are to outputs, as pre-images are to images.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              42 mins ago













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Think about what the inverse mapping for $f$ would be if indeed it would be a surjection: it would take the derivatives to the original function. Phrased another way, it would take a function to its antiderivative, right?



            Well, we know that all polynomials have an antiderivative (which is itself a polynomial), and since the codomain of $f$ is basically the set of real polynomials, we have a pre-image for each polynomial in $P$ - its antiderivative. Thus, $f$ is surjective.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Think about what the inverse mapping for $f$ would be if indeed it would be a surjection: it would take the derivatives to the original function. Phrased another way, it would take a function to its antiderivative, right?



            Well, we know that all polynomials have an antiderivative (which is itself a polynomial), and since the codomain of $f$ is basically the set of real polynomials, we have a pre-image for each polynomial in $P$ - its antiderivative. Thus, $f$ is surjective.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 50 mins ago









            Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

            10.5k31842




            10.5k31842











            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by pre-image?
              $endgroup$
              – John Arg
              43 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              You know how, say, $f(x)$ might be called the "image" for $x$? Same sort of deal: we would also say $x$ is the pre-image for $f(x)$. To use, arguably, more familiar terminology: inputs are to outputs, as pre-images are to images.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              42 mins ago
















            • $begingroup$
              What do you mean by pre-image?
              $endgroup$
              – John Arg
              43 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              You know how, say, $f(x)$ might be called the "image" for $x$? Same sort of deal: we would also say $x$ is the pre-image for $f(x)$. To use, arguably, more familiar terminology: inputs are to outputs, as pre-images are to images.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              42 mins ago















            $begingroup$
            What do you mean by pre-image?
            $endgroup$
            – John Arg
            43 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            What do you mean by pre-image?
            $endgroup$
            – John Arg
            43 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            You know how, say, $f(x)$ might be called the "image" for $x$? Same sort of deal: we would also say $x$ is the pre-image for $f(x)$. To use, arguably, more familiar terminology: inputs are to outputs, as pre-images are to images.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            42 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            You know how, say, $f(x)$ might be called the "image" for $x$? Same sort of deal: we would also say $x$ is the pre-image for $f(x)$. To use, arguably, more familiar terminology: inputs are to outputs, as pre-images are to images.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            42 mins ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187852%2fdetermine-whether-f-is-a-function-an-injection-a-surjection%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

            Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

            Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6