How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?Analyzing Logistic Regression when not using a dichotomous dependent variableEstimating logistic regression coefficients in a case-control design when the outcome variable is not case/control statusWhen does quantile regression produce biased coefficients (if ever)?How can I account for a nonlinear variable in a logistic regression?Variable Selection for Logistic regressionlogistic regression: the relation between sample proportion and prediction?How to compare the performance of two classification methods? (logistic regression and classification trees)Unbalanced Design with a Large Data Set and Logistic RegressionFit logistic regression with linear constraints on coefficients in RLogistic regression with double censored independent variable

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

How to move a thin line with the black arrow in Illustrator?

DC-DC converter from low voltage at high current, to high voltage at low current

Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX

Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

What are the disadvantages of having a left skewed distribution?

Today is the Center

Two films in a tank, only one comes out with a development error – why?

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using Multiattack?

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?

Roll the carpet

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Can a monk's single staff be considered dual wielded, as per the Dual Wielder feat?

Java Casting: Java 11 throws LambdaConversionException while 1.8 does not

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it



How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?


Analyzing Logistic Regression when not using a dichotomous dependent variableEstimating logistic regression coefficients in a case-control design when the outcome variable is not case/control statusWhen does quantile regression produce biased coefficients (if ever)?How can I account for a nonlinear variable in a logistic regression?Variable Selection for Logistic regressionlogistic regression: the relation between sample proportion and prediction?How to compare the performance of two classification methods? (logistic regression and classification trees)Unbalanced Design with a Large Data Set and Logistic RegressionFit logistic regression with linear constraints on coefficients in RLogistic regression with double censored independent variable






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


I googled a bit but didn't find anything on this.



Suppose you do a quantile regression on the qth quantile of the dependent variable.



Then you split the DV at the qth quantile and label the result 0 and 1. Then you do logistic regression on the categorized DV.



I'm looking for any Monte-Carlo studies of this or reasons to prefer one over the other etc.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Could you show us any reasonable way even to compare the results of the two regressions? After all, unless you have something a little less general in mind, the coefficients of the regressors in these two models have entirely different meanings and interpretations, so in what sense are we to understand what you mean by "prefer"?
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    1 hour ago

















5












$begingroup$


I googled a bit but didn't find anything on this.



Suppose you do a quantile regression on the qth quantile of the dependent variable.



Then you split the DV at the qth quantile and label the result 0 and 1. Then you do logistic regression on the categorized DV.



I'm looking for any Monte-Carlo studies of this or reasons to prefer one over the other etc.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Could you show us any reasonable way even to compare the results of the two regressions? After all, unless you have something a little less general in mind, the coefficients of the regressors in these two models have entirely different meanings and interpretations, so in what sense are we to understand what you mean by "prefer"?
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    1 hour ago













5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


I googled a bit but didn't find anything on this.



Suppose you do a quantile regression on the qth quantile of the dependent variable.



Then you split the DV at the qth quantile and label the result 0 and 1. Then you do logistic regression on the categorized DV.



I'm looking for any Monte-Carlo studies of this or reasons to prefer one over the other etc.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I googled a bit but didn't find anything on this.



Suppose you do a quantile regression on the qth quantile of the dependent variable.



Then you split the DV at the qth quantile and label the result 0 and 1. Then you do logistic regression on the categorized DV.



I'm looking for any Monte-Carlo studies of this or reasons to prefer one over the other etc.







logistic quantile-regression






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









Peter FlomPeter Flom

77k12109215




77k12109215











  • $begingroup$
    Could you show us any reasonable way even to compare the results of the two regressions? After all, unless you have something a little less general in mind, the coefficients of the regressors in these two models have entirely different meanings and interpretations, so in what sense are we to understand what you mean by "prefer"?
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Could you show us any reasonable way even to compare the results of the two regressions? After all, unless you have something a little less general in mind, the coefficients of the regressors in these two models have entirely different meanings and interpretations, so in what sense are we to understand what you mean by "prefer"?
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
Could you show us any reasonable way even to compare the results of the two regressions? After all, unless you have something a little less general in mind, the coefficients of the regressors in these two models have entirely different meanings and interpretations, so in what sense are we to understand what you mean by "prefer"?
$endgroup$
– whuber
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Could you show us any reasonable way even to compare the results of the two regressions? After all, unless you have something a little less general in mind, the coefficients of the regressors in these two models have entirely different meanings and interpretations, so in what sense are we to understand what you mean by "prefer"?
$endgroup$
– whuber
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

For simplicity, assume you have a continuous dependent variable Y and a continuous predictor variable X.



Logistic Regression



If I understand your post correctly, your logistic regression will categorize Y into 0 and 1 based on the quantile of the (unconditional) distribution of Y. Specifically, the q-th quantile of the distribution of observed Y values will be computed and Ycat will be defined as 0 if Y is strictly less than this quantile and 1 if Y is greater than or equal to this quantile.



If the above captures your intent, then the logistic regression will model the odds of Y exceeding or being equal to the (observed) q-th quantile of the (unconditional) Y distribution as a function of X.



** Quantile Regression**



On the other hand, if you are performing a quantile regression of Y on X, you are focusing on modelling how the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y given X changes as a function of X.



Logistic Regression versus Quantile Regression



It seems to me that these two procedures have totally different aims, since the first procedure (i.e., logistic regression) focuses on the q-th quantile of the unconditional distribution of Y, whereas the second procedure (i.e., quantile regression) focuses on the the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y.



The unconditional distribution of Y is the 
distribution of Y values (hence it ignores any
information about the X values).

The conditional distribution of Y given X is the
distribution of those Y values for which the values
of X are the same.


Illustrative Example



For illustration purposes, let's say Y = cholesterol and X = body weight.



Then logistic regression is modelling the odds of having a 'high' cholesterol value (i.e., greater than or equal to the q-th quantile of the observed cholesterol values) as a function of body weight, where the definition of 'high' has no relation to body weight. In other words, the marker for what constitutes a 'high' cholesterol value is independent of body weight. What changes with body weight in this model is the odds that a cholesterol value would exceed this marker.



On the other hand, quantile regression is looking at how the 'marker' cholesterol values for which q% of the subjects with the same body weight in the underlying population have a higher cholesterol value vary as a function of body weight. You can think of these cholesterol values as markers for identifying what cholesterol values are 'high' - but in this case, each marker depends on the corresponding body weight; furthermore, the markers are assumed to change in a predictable fashion as the value of X changes (e.g., the markers tend to increase as X increases).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I agree with all that. Yet, there does seem to be a similarity - that is, both look at the qth quantile as a function of the same independent variables.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Flom
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, but the difference is that one method looks at the unconditional quantile (i.e., logistic regression) while the other looks at the conditional quantile (i.e., quantile regression). Those two quantiles keep track of different things.
    $endgroup$
    – Isabella Ghement
    1 hour ago


















0












$begingroup$

They won't be equal, and the reason is simple.



With quantile regression you want to model the quantile conditional of the independent variables. Your approach with logistic regression fits the marginal quantile.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f401421%2fhow-does-quantile-regression-compare-to-logistic-regression-with-the-variable-sp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    For simplicity, assume you have a continuous dependent variable Y and a continuous predictor variable X.



    Logistic Regression



    If I understand your post correctly, your logistic regression will categorize Y into 0 and 1 based on the quantile of the (unconditional) distribution of Y. Specifically, the q-th quantile of the distribution of observed Y values will be computed and Ycat will be defined as 0 if Y is strictly less than this quantile and 1 if Y is greater than or equal to this quantile.



    If the above captures your intent, then the logistic regression will model the odds of Y exceeding or being equal to the (observed) q-th quantile of the (unconditional) Y distribution as a function of X.



    ** Quantile Regression**



    On the other hand, if you are performing a quantile regression of Y on X, you are focusing on modelling how the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y given X changes as a function of X.



    Logistic Regression versus Quantile Regression



    It seems to me that these two procedures have totally different aims, since the first procedure (i.e., logistic regression) focuses on the q-th quantile of the unconditional distribution of Y, whereas the second procedure (i.e., quantile regression) focuses on the the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y.



    The unconditional distribution of Y is the 
    distribution of Y values (hence it ignores any
    information about the X values).

    The conditional distribution of Y given X is the
    distribution of those Y values for which the values
    of X are the same.


    Illustrative Example



    For illustration purposes, let's say Y = cholesterol and X = body weight.



    Then logistic regression is modelling the odds of having a 'high' cholesterol value (i.e., greater than or equal to the q-th quantile of the observed cholesterol values) as a function of body weight, where the definition of 'high' has no relation to body weight. In other words, the marker for what constitutes a 'high' cholesterol value is independent of body weight. What changes with body weight in this model is the odds that a cholesterol value would exceed this marker.



    On the other hand, quantile regression is looking at how the 'marker' cholesterol values for which q% of the subjects with the same body weight in the underlying population have a higher cholesterol value vary as a function of body weight. You can think of these cholesterol values as markers for identifying what cholesterol values are 'high' - but in this case, each marker depends on the corresponding body weight; furthermore, the markers are assumed to change in a predictable fashion as the value of X changes (e.g., the markers tend to increase as X increases).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I agree with all that. Yet, there does seem to be a similarity - that is, both look at the qth quantile as a function of the same independent variables.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Flom
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Yes, but the difference is that one method looks at the unconditional quantile (i.e., logistic regression) while the other looks at the conditional quantile (i.e., quantile regression). Those two quantiles keep track of different things.
      $endgroup$
      – Isabella Ghement
      1 hour ago















    4












    $begingroup$

    For simplicity, assume you have a continuous dependent variable Y and a continuous predictor variable X.



    Logistic Regression



    If I understand your post correctly, your logistic regression will categorize Y into 0 and 1 based on the quantile of the (unconditional) distribution of Y. Specifically, the q-th quantile of the distribution of observed Y values will be computed and Ycat will be defined as 0 if Y is strictly less than this quantile and 1 if Y is greater than or equal to this quantile.



    If the above captures your intent, then the logistic regression will model the odds of Y exceeding or being equal to the (observed) q-th quantile of the (unconditional) Y distribution as a function of X.



    ** Quantile Regression**



    On the other hand, if you are performing a quantile regression of Y on X, you are focusing on modelling how the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y given X changes as a function of X.



    Logistic Regression versus Quantile Regression



    It seems to me that these two procedures have totally different aims, since the first procedure (i.e., logistic regression) focuses on the q-th quantile of the unconditional distribution of Y, whereas the second procedure (i.e., quantile regression) focuses on the the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y.



    The unconditional distribution of Y is the 
    distribution of Y values (hence it ignores any
    information about the X values).

    The conditional distribution of Y given X is the
    distribution of those Y values for which the values
    of X are the same.


    Illustrative Example



    For illustration purposes, let's say Y = cholesterol and X = body weight.



    Then logistic regression is modelling the odds of having a 'high' cholesterol value (i.e., greater than or equal to the q-th quantile of the observed cholesterol values) as a function of body weight, where the definition of 'high' has no relation to body weight. In other words, the marker for what constitutes a 'high' cholesterol value is independent of body weight. What changes with body weight in this model is the odds that a cholesterol value would exceed this marker.



    On the other hand, quantile regression is looking at how the 'marker' cholesterol values for which q% of the subjects with the same body weight in the underlying population have a higher cholesterol value vary as a function of body weight. You can think of these cholesterol values as markers for identifying what cholesterol values are 'high' - but in this case, each marker depends on the corresponding body weight; furthermore, the markers are assumed to change in a predictable fashion as the value of X changes (e.g., the markers tend to increase as X increases).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I agree with all that. Yet, there does seem to be a similarity - that is, both look at the qth quantile as a function of the same independent variables.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Flom
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Yes, but the difference is that one method looks at the unconditional quantile (i.e., logistic regression) while the other looks at the conditional quantile (i.e., quantile regression). Those two quantiles keep track of different things.
      $endgroup$
      – Isabella Ghement
      1 hour ago













    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    For simplicity, assume you have a continuous dependent variable Y and a continuous predictor variable X.



    Logistic Regression



    If I understand your post correctly, your logistic regression will categorize Y into 0 and 1 based on the quantile of the (unconditional) distribution of Y. Specifically, the q-th quantile of the distribution of observed Y values will be computed and Ycat will be defined as 0 if Y is strictly less than this quantile and 1 if Y is greater than or equal to this quantile.



    If the above captures your intent, then the logistic regression will model the odds of Y exceeding or being equal to the (observed) q-th quantile of the (unconditional) Y distribution as a function of X.



    ** Quantile Regression**



    On the other hand, if you are performing a quantile regression of Y on X, you are focusing on modelling how the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y given X changes as a function of X.



    Logistic Regression versus Quantile Regression



    It seems to me that these two procedures have totally different aims, since the first procedure (i.e., logistic regression) focuses on the q-th quantile of the unconditional distribution of Y, whereas the second procedure (i.e., quantile regression) focuses on the the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y.



    The unconditional distribution of Y is the 
    distribution of Y values (hence it ignores any
    information about the X values).

    The conditional distribution of Y given X is the
    distribution of those Y values for which the values
    of X are the same.


    Illustrative Example



    For illustration purposes, let's say Y = cholesterol and X = body weight.



    Then logistic regression is modelling the odds of having a 'high' cholesterol value (i.e., greater than or equal to the q-th quantile of the observed cholesterol values) as a function of body weight, where the definition of 'high' has no relation to body weight. In other words, the marker for what constitutes a 'high' cholesterol value is independent of body weight. What changes with body weight in this model is the odds that a cholesterol value would exceed this marker.



    On the other hand, quantile regression is looking at how the 'marker' cholesterol values for which q% of the subjects with the same body weight in the underlying population have a higher cholesterol value vary as a function of body weight. You can think of these cholesterol values as markers for identifying what cholesterol values are 'high' - but in this case, each marker depends on the corresponding body weight; furthermore, the markers are assumed to change in a predictable fashion as the value of X changes (e.g., the markers tend to increase as X increases).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    For simplicity, assume you have a continuous dependent variable Y and a continuous predictor variable X.



    Logistic Regression



    If I understand your post correctly, your logistic regression will categorize Y into 0 and 1 based on the quantile of the (unconditional) distribution of Y. Specifically, the q-th quantile of the distribution of observed Y values will be computed and Ycat will be defined as 0 if Y is strictly less than this quantile and 1 if Y is greater than or equal to this quantile.



    If the above captures your intent, then the logistic regression will model the odds of Y exceeding or being equal to the (observed) q-th quantile of the (unconditional) Y distribution as a function of X.



    ** Quantile Regression**



    On the other hand, if you are performing a quantile regression of Y on X, you are focusing on modelling how the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y given X changes as a function of X.



    Logistic Regression versus Quantile Regression



    It seems to me that these two procedures have totally different aims, since the first procedure (i.e., logistic regression) focuses on the q-th quantile of the unconditional distribution of Y, whereas the second procedure (i.e., quantile regression) focuses on the the q-th quantile of the conditional distribution of Y.



    The unconditional distribution of Y is the 
    distribution of Y values (hence it ignores any
    information about the X values).

    The conditional distribution of Y given X is the
    distribution of those Y values for which the values
    of X are the same.


    Illustrative Example



    For illustration purposes, let's say Y = cholesterol and X = body weight.



    Then logistic regression is modelling the odds of having a 'high' cholesterol value (i.e., greater than or equal to the q-th quantile of the observed cholesterol values) as a function of body weight, where the definition of 'high' has no relation to body weight. In other words, the marker for what constitutes a 'high' cholesterol value is independent of body weight. What changes with body weight in this model is the odds that a cholesterol value would exceed this marker.



    On the other hand, quantile regression is looking at how the 'marker' cholesterol values for which q% of the subjects with the same body weight in the underlying population have a higher cholesterol value vary as a function of body weight. You can think of these cholesterol values as markers for identifying what cholesterol values are 'high' - but in this case, each marker depends on the corresponding body weight; furthermore, the markers are assumed to change in a predictable fashion as the value of X changes (e.g., the markers tend to increase as X increases).







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    Isabella GhementIsabella Ghement

    7,823422




    7,823422







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I agree with all that. Yet, there does seem to be a similarity - that is, both look at the qth quantile as a function of the same independent variables.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Flom
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Yes, but the difference is that one method looks at the unconditional quantile (i.e., logistic regression) while the other looks at the conditional quantile (i.e., quantile regression). Those two quantiles keep track of different things.
      $endgroup$
      – Isabella Ghement
      1 hour ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I agree with all that. Yet, there does seem to be a similarity - that is, both look at the qth quantile as a function of the same independent variables.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Flom
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Yes, but the difference is that one method looks at the unconditional quantile (i.e., logistic regression) while the other looks at the conditional quantile (i.e., quantile regression). Those two quantiles keep track of different things.
      $endgroup$
      – Isabella Ghement
      1 hour ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I agree with all that. Yet, there does seem to be a similarity - that is, both look at the qth quantile as a function of the same independent variables.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Flom
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I agree with all that. Yet, there does seem to be a similarity - that is, both look at the qth quantile as a function of the same independent variables.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Flom
    1 hour ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, but the difference is that one method looks at the unconditional quantile (i.e., logistic regression) while the other looks at the conditional quantile (i.e., quantile regression). Those two quantiles keep track of different things.
    $endgroup$
    – Isabella Ghement
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Yes, but the difference is that one method looks at the unconditional quantile (i.e., logistic regression) while the other looks at the conditional quantile (i.e., quantile regression). Those two quantiles keep track of different things.
    $endgroup$
    – Isabella Ghement
    1 hour ago













    0












    $begingroup$

    They won't be equal, and the reason is simple.



    With quantile regression you want to model the quantile conditional of the independent variables. Your approach with logistic regression fits the marginal quantile.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      They won't be equal, and the reason is simple.



      With quantile regression you want to model the quantile conditional of the independent variables. Your approach with logistic regression fits the marginal quantile.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        They won't be equal, and the reason is simple.



        With quantile regression you want to model the quantile conditional of the independent variables. Your approach with logistic regression fits the marginal quantile.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        They won't be equal, and the reason is simple.



        With quantile regression you want to model the quantile conditional of the independent variables. Your approach with logistic regression fits the marginal quantile.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 27 mins ago









        FirebugFirebug

        7,72923280




        7,72923280



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f401421%2fhow-does-quantile-regression-compare-to-logistic-regression-with-the-variable-sp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

            Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

            Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager