ODD NUMBER in Cognitive Linguistics of WILLIAM CROFT and D. ALAN CRUSE The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat does the term “coercion” mean in the context of Cognitive Linguistics?What does a cognitive linguistics researcher actually do in practice?What kinds of maths to learn for understanding dynamical systems in cognitive linguistics?Short summary of Cognitive LinguisticsDoes understanding free word order require a distinct cognitive process?How does flexible and context-dependent Categorisation not imply fuzzy Category Boundaries?Subject-verb number agreement with complex subjectDefinition of “concept” and "conceptual field in cognitive linguisticsWhat is the view of prototype theory regarding features?Is there any bridge between cognitive linguistics and cognitive psychology, beside knowledge representation?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Falsification in Math vs Science

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Does adding complexity mean a more secure cipher?

Why doesn't UInt have a toDouble()?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

If a sorcerer casts the Banishment spell on a PC while in Avernus, does the PC return to their home plane?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

How to obtain a position of last non-zero element

Match Roman Numerals



ODD NUMBER in Cognitive Linguistics of WILLIAM CROFT and D. ALAN CRUSE



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat does the term “coercion” mean in the context of Cognitive Linguistics?What does a cognitive linguistics researcher actually do in practice?What kinds of maths to learn for understanding dynamical systems in cognitive linguistics?Short summary of Cognitive LinguisticsDoes understanding free word order require a distinct cognitive process?How does flexible and context-dependent Categorisation not imply fuzzy Category Boundaries?Subject-verb number agreement with complex subjectDefinition of “concept” and "conceptual field in cognitive linguisticsWhat is the view of prototype theory regarding features?Is there any bridge between cognitive linguistics and cognitive psychology, beside knowledge representation?










2















In the subsection 4.3.4.2 The ‘odd number paradox’ of Cognitive Linguistics by W. Croft & D. A. Cruse



We read:




The ‘odd number paradox’ has also been put forward as a problem for
prototype theory. Armstrong et al. (1983) found that people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features. Their proposed solution, the so-called ‘dual representation’ hypothesis, combines the prototype approach and the classical approach (Smith et al. 1974). The idea is that concepts have two representations, which have different functions. There is a ‘core’ representation, which has basically the form of a classical definition. This representation will govern the logical properties of the concept. The other representation is some sort of prototype system which prioritizes the most typical features, and whose function is to allow rapid categorization of instances encountered. With this set-up, the odd-number effect ceases to be a puzzle. However, this conjunction of two theories inherits most of the problems of both of them: in particular, it reinstates a major problem of the classical theory that prototype theory was intended to solve, namely, the fact that for a great many everyday concepts there is no available core definition.




It is clear for me that they speak about conjecture of the two representations of a concept.
But I is unclear for me what do they mean in this sentence 'people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features.'










share|improve this question









New contributor




Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    2















    In the subsection 4.3.4.2 The ‘odd number paradox’ of Cognitive Linguistics by W. Croft & D. A. Cruse



    We read:




    The ‘odd number paradox’ has also been put forward as a problem for
    prototype theory. Armstrong et al. (1983) found that people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features. Their proposed solution, the so-called ‘dual representation’ hypothesis, combines the prototype approach and the classical approach (Smith et al. 1974). The idea is that concepts have two representations, which have different functions. There is a ‘core’ representation, which has basically the form of a classical definition. This representation will govern the logical properties of the concept. The other representation is some sort of prototype system which prioritizes the most typical features, and whose function is to allow rapid categorization of instances encountered. With this set-up, the odd-number effect ceases to be a puzzle. However, this conjunction of two theories inherits most of the problems of both of them: in particular, it reinstates a major problem of the classical theory that prototype theory was intended to solve, namely, the fact that for a great many everyday concepts there is no available core definition.




    It is clear for me that they speak about conjecture of the two representations of a concept.
    But I is unclear for me what do they mean in this sentence 'people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features.'










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2


      1






      In the subsection 4.3.4.2 The ‘odd number paradox’ of Cognitive Linguistics by W. Croft & D. A. Cruse



      We read:




      The ‘odd number paradox’ has also been put forward as a problem for
      prototype theory. Armstrong et al. (1983) found that people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features. Their proposed solution, the so-called ‘dual representation’ hypothesis, combines the prototype approach and the classical approach (Smith et al. 1974). The idea is that concepts have two representations, which have different functions. There is a ‘core’ representation, which has basically the form of a classical definition. This representation will govern the logical properties of the concept. The other representation is some sort of prototype system which prioritizes the most typical features, and whose function is to allow rapid categorization of instances encountered. With this set-up, the odd-number effect ceases to be a puzzle. However, this conjunction of two theories inherits most of the problems of both of them: in particular, it reinstates a major problem of the classical theory that prototype theory was intended to solve, namely, the fact that for a great many everyday concepts there is no available core definition.




      It is clear for me that they speak about conjecture of the two representations of a concept.
      But I is unclear for me what do they mean in this sentence 'people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features.'










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      In the subsection 4.3.4.2 The ‘odd number paradox’ of Cognitive Linguistics by W. Croft & D. A. Cruse



      We read:




      The ‘odd number paradox’ has also been put forward as a problem for
      prototype theory. Armstrong et al. (1983) found that people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features. Their proposed solution, the so-called ‘dual representation’ hypothesis, combines the prototype approach and the classical approach (Smith et al. 1974). The idea is that concepts have two representations, which have different functions. There is a ‘core’ representation, which has basically the form of a classical definition. This representation will govern the logical properties of the concept. The other representation is some sort of prototype system which prioritizes the most typical features, and whose function is to allow rapid categorization of instances encountered. With this set-up, the odd-number effect ceases to be a puzzle. However, this conjunction of two theories inherits most of the problems of both of them: in particular, it reinstates a major problem of the classical theory that prototype theory was intended to solve, namely, the fact that for a great many everyday concepts there is no available core definition.




      It is clear for me that they speak about conjecture of the two representations of a concept.
      But I is unclear for me what do they mean in this sentence 'people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features.'







      cognitive-linguistics prototype-theory






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      curiousdannii

      2,96431531




      2,96431531






      New contributor




      Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 6 hours ago









      Ana VardosanidzeAna Vardosanidze

      111




      111




      New contributor




      Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          "people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features" means that you can ask people things like "which is a better example of an odd number, 19 or 1001" and at least some of them will answer with one or the other (I'd guess most people will go with 19) rather than rejecting the question by saying something like "they're both odd numbers, since neither is divisible by two, so they're equally good examples". Presumably whatever sources Croft and Cruse cite would have details on the exact nature of the experiments that have been done.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you for your answer, it was very useful one. I have an additional question: Why do they call it paradox? Does the paradox mean choosing one of the odd numbers, when they are both the same type and one is not batter than another?

            – Ana Vardosanidze
            5 hours ago











          • The paradox is that the definition of odd numbers means that no odd number is more odd-like than another; but people act as if they were. And yet anybody who knows what's an odd number knows the definition. Therefore people seem to act in contradiction to the definition they themselves are using.

            – melboiko
            1 hour ago












          • Probably people would say that 444 was more even than 716; if we're presented with a forced choice, we'll cope. That doesn't say much about basic representations, though.

            – jlawler
            38 mins ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "312"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31142%2fodd-number-in-cognitive-linguistics-of-william-croft-and-d-alan-cruse%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          "people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features" means that you can ask people things like "which is a better example of an odd number, 19 or 1001" and at least some of them will answer with one or the other (I'd guess most people will go with 19) rather than rejecting the question by saying something like "they're both odd numbers, since neither is divisible by two, so they're equally good examples". Presumably whatever sources Croft and Cruse cite would have details on the exact nature of the experiments that have been done.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you for your answer, it was very useful one. I have an additional question: Why do they call it paradox? Does the paradox mean choosing one of the odd numbers, when they are both the same type and one is not batter than another?

            – Ana Vardosanidze
            5 hours ago











          • The paradox is that the definition of odd numbers means that no odd number is more odd-like than another; but people act as if they were. And yet anybody who knows what's an odd number knows the definition. Therefore people seem to act in contradiction to the definition they themselves are using.

            – melboiko
            1 hour ago












          • Probably people would say that 444 was more even than 716; if we're presented with a forced choice, we'll cope. That doesn't say much about basic representations, though.

            – jlawler
            38 mins ago
















          3














          "people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features" means that you can ask people things like "which is a better example of an odd number, 19 or 1001" and at least some of them will answer with one or the other (I'd guess most people will go with 19) rather than rejecting the question by saying something like "they're both odd numbers, since neither is divisible by two, so they're equally good examples". Presumably whatever sources Croft and Cruse cite would have details on the exact nature of the experiments that have been done.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you for your answer, it was very useful one. I have an additional question: Why do they call it paradox? Does the paradox mean choosing one of the odd numbers, when they are both the same type and one is not batter than another?

            – Ana Vardosanidze
            5 hours ago











          • The paradox is that the definition of odd numbers means that no odd number is more odd-like than another; but people act as if they were. And yet anybody who knows what's an odd number knows the definition. Therefore people seem to act in contradiction to the definition they themselves are using.

            – melboiko
            1 hour ago












          • Probably people would say that 444 was more even than 716; if we're presented with a forced choice, we'll cope. That doesn't say much about basic representations, though.

            – jlawler
            38 mins ago














          3












          3








          3







          "people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features" means that you can ask people things like "which is a better example of an odd number, 19 or 1001" and at least some of them will answer with one or the other (I'd guess most people will go with 19) rather than rejecting the question by saying something like "they're both odd numbers, since neither is divisible by two, so they're equally good examples". Presumably whatever sources Croft and Cruse cite would have details on the exact nature of the experiments that have been done.






          share|improve this answer













          "people will grade ODD NUMBERS for centrality, even though the category ODD NUMBER has a clear definition in terms of necessary and sufficient features" means that you can ask people things like "which is a better example of an odd number, 19 or 1001" and at least some of them will answer with one or the other (I'd guess most people will go with 19) rather than rejecting the question by saying something like "they're both odd numbers, since neither is divisible by two, so they're equally good examples". Presumably whatever sources Croft and Cruse cite would have details on the exact nature of the experiments that have been done.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          sumelicsumelic

          10k12156




          10k12156












          • Thank you for your answer, it was very useful one. I have an additional question: Why do they call it paradox? Does the paradox mean choosing one of the odd numbers, when they are both the same type and one is not batter than another?

            – Ana Vardosanidze
            5 hours ago











          • The paradox is that the definition of odd numbers means that no odd number is more odd-like than another; but people act as if they were. And yet anybody who knows what's an odd number knows the definition. Therefore people seem to act in contradiction to the definition they themselves are using.

            – melboiko
            1 hour ago












          • Probably people would say that 444 was more even than 716; if we're presented with a forced choice, we'll cope. That doesn't say much about basic representations, though.

            – jlawler
            38 mins ago


















          • Thank you for your answer, it was very useful one. I have an additional question: Why do they call it paradox? Does the paradox mean choosing one of the odd numbers, when they are both the same type and one is not batter than another?

            – Ana Vardosanidze
            5 hours ago











          • The paradox is that the definition of odd numbers means that no odd number is more odd-like than another; but people act as if they were. And yet anybody who knows what's an odd number knows the definition. Therefore people seem to act in contradiction to the definition they themselves are using.

            – melboiko
            1 hour ago












          • Probably people would say that 444 was more even than 716; if we're presented with a forced choice, we'll cope. That doesn't say much about basic representations, though.

            – jlawler
            38 mins ago

















          Thank you for your answer, it was very useful one. I have an additional question: Why do they call it paradox? Does the paradox mean choosing one of the odd numbers, when they are both the same type and one is not batter than another?

          – Ana Vardosanidze
          5 hours ago





          Thank you for your answer, it was very useful one. I have an additional question: Why do they call it paradox? Does the paradox mean choosing one of the odd numbers, when they are both the same type and one is not batter than another?

          – Ana Vardosanidze
          5 hours ago













          The paradox is that the definition of odd numbers means that no odd number is more odd-like than another; but people act as if they were. And yet anybody who knows what's an odd number knows the definition. Therefore people seem to act in contradiction to the definition they themselves are using.

          – melboiko
          1 hour ago






          The paradox is that the definition of odd numbers means that no odd number is more odd-like than another; but people act as if they were. And yet anybody who knows what's an odd number knows the definition. Therefore people seem to act in contradiction to the definition they themselves are using.

          – melboiko
          1 hour ago














          Probably people would say that 444 was more even than 716; if we're presented with a forced choice, we'll cope. That doesn't say much about basic representations, though.

          – jlawler
          38 mins ago






          Probably people would say that 444 was more even than 716; if we're presented with a forced choice, we'll cope. That doesn't say much about basic representations, though.

          – jlawler
          38 mins ago











          Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          Ana Vardosanidze is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31142%2fodd-number-in-cognitive-linguistics-of-william-croft-and-d-alan-cruse%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

          Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

          Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager