Do sorcerers' subtle spells require a skill check to be unseen?Does casting a spell require a check to succeed?Do Sorcerers need to know a lot of attack spells?Which spells do Wizards get at lower levels than Sorcerers?Can multi-classing improve a sorcerer's solo-potential?Does this fix the “Quadratic Wizards” problem in Pathfinder?Stone Warder Sorcerer spell selectionSubtle spell and saving throwsCan Catapult be used on Delayed Blast Fireball?D&D 5e, Looking for thoughts and suggestions on a character build and backstory I'm looking to makeIs it possible for a swallowed caster to cast Fireball outside of a Giant Toad?
Sort a list by elements of another list
How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?
Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?
What is paid subscription needed for in Mortal Kombat 11?
Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?
Personal Teleportation as a Weapon
Where does the Z80 processor start executing from?
How did Arya survive the stabbing?
Do sorcerers' subtle spells require a skill check to be unseen?
How did Doctor Strange see the winning outcome in Avengers: Infinity War?
Avoiding estate tax by giving multiple gifts
How easy is it to start Magic from scratch?
Why escape if the_content isnt?
India just shot down a satellite from the ground. At what altitude range is the resulting debris field?
Two monoidal structures and copowering
Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?
Integer addition + constant, is it a group?
Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
Go Pregnant or Go Home
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
How many times can American Tourist re-enter UK in same 6 month period?
How to escape string to filename? It is in backup a file append date
Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm
Do sorcerers' subtle spells require a skill check to be unseen?
Does casting a spell require a check to succeed?Do Sorcerers need to know a lot of attack spells?Which spells do Wizards get at lower levels than Sorcerers?Can multi-classing improve a sorcerer's solo-potential?Does this fix the “Quadratic Wizards” problem in Pathfinder?Stone Warder Sorcerer spell selectionSubtle spell and saving throwsCan Catapult be used on Delayed Blast Fireball?D&D 5e, Looking for thoughts and suggestions on a character build and backstory I'm looking to makeIs it possible for a swallowed caster to cast Fireball outside of a Giant Toad?
$begingroup$
I have a guest player who is being a secretly evil plant inside the party causing trouble. He's a sorcerer who wants to use subtle spell metamagic to stop the party from delving into his master's old lair, and he has a custom ring item that works as a hands-free arcane focus. He and I agreed that he'd give me signals about what to cast and where, and I'd roll the damage and keep track of the lost sorcerer points.
So the party is sneaking past a sleeping giant and the sorcerer signals fireball on the party to wake the giant. After the battle, the cleric says her passive perception (which is pretty high, admittedly) should have let her see where the fireball originated from, pointing out that fireball is:
A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range
Now, I assume the pointing finger is part of the somatic components of fireball and thus not necessary with the Subtle Spell metamagic. And spells that obviously originate from the caster like cone attacks, it wouldn't be particularly possible to hide the location of the caster. But fireball's beam effect doesn't seem to be a mechanic of the spell, more just flavor text.
I addressed the problem in-game by rolling a sleight of hand check against the cleric's passive perception using the sorcerer's stats and managed to keep it hidden and "it happened so fast you saw it came from behind you but nothing else", but is that the right solution?
But the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. Does it follow the stealth rules where any attack, even long distance arrows, immediately gives away the position of the attacker? Would a subtle Psychic Scream be traceable to the caster despite having no visible ties to the caster?
dnd-5e spells magic sorcerer
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a guest player who is being a secretly evil plant inside the party causing trouble. He's a sorcerer who wants to use subtle spell metamagic to stop the party from delving into his master's old lair, and he has a custom ring item that works as a hands-free arcane focus. He and I agreed that he'd give me signals about what to cast and where, and I'd roll the damage and keep track of the lost sorcerer points.
So the party is sneaking past a sleeping giant and the sorcerer signals fireball on the party to wake the giant. After the battle, the cleric says her passive perception (which is pretty high, admittedly) should have let her see where the fireball originated from, pointing out that fireball is:
A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range
Now, I assume the pointing finger is part of the somatic components of fireball and thus not necessary with the Subtle Spell metamagic. And spells that obviously originate from the caster like cone attacks, it wouldn't be particularly possible to hide the location of the caster. But fireball's beam effect doesn't seem to be a mechanic of the spell, more just flavor text.
I addressed the problem in-game by rolling a sleight of hand check against the cleric's passive perception using the sorcerer's stats and managed to keep it hidden and "it happened so fast you saw it came from behind you but nothing else", but is that the right solution?
But the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. Does it follow the stealth rules where any attack, even long distance arrows, immediately gives away the position of the attacker? Would a subtle Psychic Scream be traceable to the caster despite having no visible ties to the caster?
dnd-5e spells magic sorcerer
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a guest player who is being a secretly evil plant inside the party causing trouble. He's a sorcerer who wants to use subtle spell metamagic to stop the party from delving into his master's old lair, and he has a custom ring item that works as a hands-free arcane focus. He and I agreed that he'd give me signals about what to cast and where, and I'd roll the damage and keep track of the lost sorcerer points.
So the party is sneaking past a sleeping giant and the sorcerer signals fireball on the party to wake the giant. After the battle, the cleric says her passive perception (which is pretty high, admittedly) should have let her see where the fireball originated from, pointing out that fireball is:
A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range
Now, I assume the pointing finger is part of the somatic components of fireball and thus not necessary with the Subtle Spell metamagic. And spells that obviously originate from the caster like cone attacks, it wouldn't be particularly possible to hide the location of the caster. But fireball's beam effect doesn't seem to be a mechanic of the spell, more just flavor text.
I addressed the problem in-game by rolling a sleight of hand check against the cleric's passive perception using the sorcerer's stats and managed to keep it hidden and "it happened so fast you saw it came from behind you but nothing else", but is that the right solution?
But the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. Does it follow the stealth rules where any attack, even long distance arrows, immediately gives away the position of the attacker? Would a subtle Psychic Scream be traceable to the caster despite having no visible ties to the caster?
dnd-5e spells magic sorcerer
$endgroup$
I have a guest player who is being a secretly evil plant inside the party causing trouble. He's a sorcerer who wants to use subtle spell metamagic to stop the party from delving into his master's old lair, and he has a custom ring item that works as a hands-free arcane focus. He and I agreed that he'd give me signals about what to cast and where, and I'd roll the damage and keep track of the lost sorcerer points.
So the party is sneaking past a sleeping giant and the sorcerer signals fireball on the party to wake the giant. After the battle, the cleric says her passive perception (which is pretty high, admittedly) should have let her see where the fireball originated from, pointing out that fireball is:
A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range
Now, I assume the pointing finger is part of the somatic components of fireball and thus not necessary with the Subtle Spell metamagic. And spells that obviously originate from the caster like cone attacks, it wouldn't be particularly possible to hide the location of the caster. But fireball's beam effect doesn't seem to be a mechanic of the spell, more just flavor text.
I addressed the problem in-game by rolling a sleight of hand check against the cleric's passive perception using the sorcerer's stats and managed to keep it hidden and "it happened so fast you saw it came from behind you but nothing else", but is that the right solution?
But the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. Does it follow the stealth rules where any attack, even long distance arrows, immediately gives away the position of the attacker? Would a subtle Psychic Scream be traceable to the caster despite having no visible ties to the caster?
dnd-5e spells magic sorcerer
dnd-5e spells magic sorcerer
asked 1 hour ago
Miles BedingerMiles Bedinger
3,914638
3,914638
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default
It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.
For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,
Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.
I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.
Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you
On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:
If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.
The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects
By the wording of Subtle Spell:
When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.
If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:
Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.
Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".
How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144051%2fdo-sorcerers-subtle-spells-require-a-skill-check-to-be-unseen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default
It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.
For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,
Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.
I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.
Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you
On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:
If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.
The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default
It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.
For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,
Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.
I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.
Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you
On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:
If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.
The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default
It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.
For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,
Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.
I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.
Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you
On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:
If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.
The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.
$endgroup$
Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default
It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.
For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,
Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.
I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.
Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you
On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:
If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.
The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.
answered 45 mins ago
Blake SteelBlake Steel
4,0681948
4,0681948
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects
By the wording of Subtle Spell:
When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.
If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:
Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.
Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".
How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects
By the wording of Subtle Spell:
When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.
If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:
Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.
Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".
How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects
By the wording of Subtle Spell:
When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.
If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:
Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.
Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".
How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.
$endgroup$
Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects
By the wording of Subtle Spell:
When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.
If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:
Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.
Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".
How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.
edited 43 mins ago
answered 49 mins ago
Mwr247Mwr247
2,5241323
2,5241323
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144051%2fdo-sorcerers-subtle-spells-require-a-skill-check-to-be-unseen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown