How do I prove this combinatorial identity Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraAlternative combinatorial proof for $sumlimits_r=0^nbinomnrbinomm+rn=sumlimits_r=0^nbinomnrbinommr2^r$Number of way to invite my friends over for dinner on 5 nightsHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Source and/or combinatorial interpretation for $F_n+k = sum_i=0^k binomkiF_n-i$Another combinatorial identity of McKayExpectation of the fraction a random function covers its rangeFind a conjecture for $F_1+F_2+…+F_n$Proof involving Fibonacci number and binomial coefficientCombinatorial proof of $n choose 1 + n choose 3 +cdots = n choose 0 + n choose 2+cdots$Generating function of even Fibonacci numbers

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?

Is accepting an invalid credit card number a security issue?

What’s with the clanks at the end of the credits in Avengers: Endgame?

Bayes factor vs P value

Is there metaphorical meaning of "aus der Haft entlassen"?

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

Why do distances seem to matter in the Foundation world?

What to do with someone that cheated their way through university and a PhD program?

Is Bran literally the world's memory?

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Drawing a german abacus as in the books of Adam Ries

Why doesn't the standard consider a template constructor as a copy constructor?

finding a tangent line to a parabola

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

Co-worker works way more than he should

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

Why does Arg'[1. + I] return -0.5?

Which big number is bigger?

First instead of 1 when referencing

How to avoid introduction cliches

Double-nominative constructions and “von”

Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson binomial distribution?



How do I prove this combinatorial identity



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraAlternative combinatorial proof for $sumlimits_r=0^nbinomnrbinomm+rn=sumlimits_r=0^nbinomnrbinommr2^r$Number of way to invite my friends over for dinner on 5 nightsHelp with how to prepare the inductive step of a strong induction exercise.Source and/or combinatorial interpretation for $F_n+k = sum_i=0^k binomkiF_n-i$Another combinatorial identity of McKayExpectation of the fraction a random function covers its rangeFind a conjecture for $F_1+F_2+…+F_n$Proof involving Fibonacci number and binomial coefficientCombinatorial proof of $n choose 1 + n choose 3 +cdots = n choose 0 + n choose 2+cdots$Generating function of even Fibonacci numbers










9












$begingroup$


Show that $2n choose n + 32n-1 choose n + 3^22n-2 choose n + cdots + 3^nn choose n \ = 2n+1 choose n+1 + 22n+1 choose n+2 + 2^22n+1 choose n+3 + cdots + 2^n2n+1 choose 2n+1$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac1(1-3x) \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac1(1-x)^n+1 \ = n choose n + n+1 choose nx + n+2 choose nx^2 + cdots + 2n-1 choose nx^n-1 + 2n choose nx^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac 1(1-2x) \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^n-1x^n-1 + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^2n+1 \= 1 + 2n+1 choose 1x + 2n+1 choose 2x^2 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n-1x^n-1 + 2n+1 choose nx^n \ = 2n+1 choose 2n+1 + 2n+1 choose 2nx + 2n+1 choose 2n-1x^2 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+2x^n-1 + 2n+1 choose n+1x^n$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago















9












$begingroup$


Show that $2n choose n + 32n-1 choose n + 3^22n-2 choose n + cdots + 3^nn choose n \ = 2n+1 choose n+1 + 22n+1 choose n+2 + 2^22n+1 choose n+3 + cdots + 2^n2n+1 choose 2n+1$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac1(1-3x) \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac1(1-x)^n+1 \ = n choose n + n+1 choose nx + n+2 choose nx^2 + cdots + 2n-1 choose nx^n-1 + 2n choose nx^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac 1(1-2x) \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^n-1x^n-1 + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^2n+1 \= 1 + 2n+1 choose 1x + 2n+1 choose 2x^2 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n-1x^n-1 + 2n+1 choose nx^n \ = 2n+1 choose 2n+1 + 2n+1 choose 2nx + 2n+1 choose 2n-1x^2 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+2x^n-1 + 2n+1 choose n+1x^n$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago













9












9








9


4



$begingroup$


Show that $2n choose n + 32n-1 choose n + 3^22n-2 choose n + cdots + 3^nn choose n \ = 2n+1 choose n+1 + 22n+1 choose n+2 + 2^22n+1 choose n+3 + cdots + 2^n2n+1 choose 2n+1$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac1(1-3x) \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac1(1-x)^n+1 \ = n choose n + n+1 choose nx + n+2 choose nx^2 + cdots + 2n-1 choose nx^n-1 + 2n choose nx^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac 1(1-2x) \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^n-1x^n-1 + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^2n+1 \= 1 + 2n+1 choose 1x + 2n+1 choose 2x^2 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n-1x^n-1 + 2n+1 choose nx^n \ = 2n+1 choose 2n+1 + 2n+1 choose 2nx + 2n+1 choose 2n-1x^2 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+2x^n-1 + 2n+1 choose n+1x^n$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Show that $2n choose n + 32n-1 choose n + 3^22n-2 choose n + cdots + 3^nn choose n \ = 2n+1 choose n+1 + 22n+1 choose n+2 + 2^22n+1 choose n+3 + cdots + 2^n2n+1 choose 2n+1$



One way that I did it was to use the idea of generating functions.
For the left hand side expression, I can find 2 functions. Consider;



$$f_1 (x) = frac1(1-3x) \ = 1 + 3^1x + 3^2x^2 + 3^3x^3 + cdots + 3^nx^n + cdots \ f_2(x) = frac1(1-x)^n+1 \ = n choose n + n+1 choose nx + n+2 choose nx^2 + cdots + 2n-1 choose nx^n-1 + 2n choose nx^n + cdots + $$



Consider the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_1 (x) . f_2 (x)$. Then the coefficient will be the expression on the left hand side.



Now we further consider 2 functions for the right-hand side expression.



Consider;



$$f_3 (x) = frac 1(1-2x) \ = 1 + 2^1x + 2^2x^2 + cdots + 2^n-1x^n-1 + 2^nx^n + cdots \ f_4 (x) = (1+x)^2n+1 \= 1 + 2n+1 choose 1x + 2n+1 choose 2x^2 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n-1x^n-1 + 2n+1 choose nx^n \ = 2n+1 choose 2n+1 + 2n+1 choose 2nx + 2n+1 choose 2n-1x^2 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+2x^n-1 + 2n+1 choose n+1x^n$$



Hence the coefficient of $x^n$ is the coefficient of $x^n$ in the expansion of $f_3(x) . f_4(x)$



This is what I managed to do so far. I'm not sure if $f_1(x) .f_2(x) = f_3(x).f_4(x)$. If the two functions are indeed equal, then I can conclude that their coefficient of $x^n$ must be equal, which will immediately answer the question. If they are equal, how do I show that they are?



If the two functions are not equal? How do I proceed to show this question?



Edit: It might not be true that the product of the two functions are equal. I tried substituting $x=0.1, n=1$. Seems like the two values are not equal. How do I proceed with this question?







combinatorics induction binomial-coefficients generating-functions combinatorial-proofs






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 34 mins ago









Arthur

123k7122211




123k7122211










asked 7 hours ago









IcycarusIcycarus

5251314




5251314











  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Einar Rødland
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
The two functions are not equal. In general for rational expressions, ie fractions where numerator and denominator are polynomials, if $a(x)/b(x)=c(x)/d(x)$ for all $x$ (ie expressions are identical), then you must have the polynomial equality $a(x)d(x)=b(x)c(x)$ which is only true if the two products are the same polynomial. If both fractions, $a(x)/b(x)$ and $c(x)/d(x)$, are without common factors, this is only true if $a(x)=kcdot c(x)$ and $b(x)=kcdot d(x)$ for some constant $k$.
$endgroup$
– Einar Rødland
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Noted! Thanks for the explanation!
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in $0,1,2$, such that



  • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

  • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?



LHS:



Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binomkn3^2n-k$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



RHS:



Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom2n+1j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^st$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom2n+1j2^j-(n+1)$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^i$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    8 mins ago


















3












$begingroup$

Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac1(1-frac13)^n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = n choose n3^n + n+1 choose n3^n-1 + cdots + 2n choose n + cdots
$$

and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^2n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n \= 2n+1 choose 2n+12^n + 2n+1 choose 2n2^n-1 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+1
$$

The two are equal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeEarnest I tried to check your point. I couldn't solve that issue, it is striking that the two sums have equal value, and the regions of convergence is fulfilled. Where is the (hidden) issue?
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas
    2 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11












$begingroup$

Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in $0,1,2$, such that



  • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

  • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?



LHS:



Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binomkn3^2n-k$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



RHS:



Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom2n+1j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^st$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom2n+1j2^j-(n+1)$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^i$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    8 mins ago















11












$begingroup$

Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in $0,1,2$, such that



  • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

  • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?



LHS:



Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binomkn3^2n-k$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



RHS:



Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom2n+1j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^st$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom2n+1j2^j-(n+1)$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^i$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    8 mins ago













11












11








11





$begingroup$

Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in $0,1,2$, such that



  • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

  • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?



LHS:



Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binomkn3^2n-k$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



RHS:



Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom2n+1j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^st$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom2n+1j2^j-(n+1)$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Here is a combinatorial proof. Both sides of the equation answer the following question:




How many sequences are there of length $2n+1$, with entries in $0,1,2$, such that



  • at least one of the entries is a $2$, and

  • there are exactly $n$ zeroes to the left of the leftmost $2$?



LHS:



Suppose the leftmost $2$ occurs in spot $k+1$. Among the $k$ spots before hand, you must choose $n$ of the entries to be zero. The $2n+1-(k+1)=2n-k$ spots afterward can be anything. There are $binomkn3^2n-k$ ways to do this. Then sum over $k$.



RHS:



Suppose there are $j$ entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$. Choose those entries which are equal to $0$ or $2$ in $binom2n+1j$ ways. The leftmost $n$ of these entries must be zero, the $(n+1)^st$ entry must be two, then the remaining $j-(n+1)$ entries can be chosen freely among $0$ and $2$. There are $binom2n+1j2^j-(n+1)$ ways to do this, then sum over $j$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









Mike EarnestMike Earnest

28.6k22155




28.6k22155







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^i$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    8 mins ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
    $endgroup$
    – Icycarus
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^i$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    8 mins ago







2




2




$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
How did you get to the process of the answer? The way that you thought of the answer is quite a unique way and I was wondering if you can share how you managed to think about this solution
$endgroup$
– Icycarus
6 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^i$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Icycarus The LHS has a fixed lower index and changing upper index. This reminded me of the Hockey stick identity, whose proof involves conditioning on where the largest element of a subset lies. Since there was a $3^i$ afterwards, I figured ternary sequences had to be involved somehow.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
8 mins ago




$begingroup$
@Icycarus The method of counting combinatorial objects is called 'combinatrial proof'. Most of math taught in school is concerned with manipulating algebraic structures; combinatorial identities are actually intended to be mapped to ... let's say somewhat real-world arrangements of objects. And the kind of proof used here involves manipulation of those arrangements rather than straight algebra. You'll get the feel for it with some much more basic identity proofs. There's often an 'easy' map from algebraic op to combinatorial op.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
8 mins ago











3












$begingroup$

Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac1(1-frac13)^n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = n choose n3^n + n+1 choose n3^n-1 + cdots + 2n choose n + cdots
$$

and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^2n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n \= 2n+1 choose 2n+12^n + 2n+1 choose 2n2^n-1 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+1
$$

The two are equal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeEarnest I tried to check your point. I couldn't solve that issue, it is striking that the two sums have equal value, and the regions of convergence is fulfilled. Where is the (hidden) issue?
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas
    2 hours ago















3












$begingroup$

Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac1(1-frac13)^n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = n choose n3^n + n+1 choose n3^n-1 + cdots + 2n choose n + cdots
$$

and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^2n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n \= 2n+1 choose 2n+12^n + 2n+1 choose 2n2^n-1 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+1
$$

The two are equal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeEarnest I tried to check your point. I couldn't solve that issue, it is striking that the two sums have equal value, and the regions of convergence is fulfilled. Where is the (hidden) issue?
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas
    2 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac1(1-frac13)^n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = n choose n3^n + n+1 choose n3^n-1 + cdots + 2n choose n + cdots
$$

and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^2n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n \= 2n+1 choose 2n+12^n + 2n+1 choose 2n2^n-1 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+1
$$

The two are equal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Using your functions, consider
$$
3^n f_2(frac13) = 3^n frac1(1-frac13)^n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n\ = n choose n3^n + n+1 choose n3^n-1 + cdots + 2n choose n + cdots
$$

and further
$$
2^n f_4 (frac12) = 2^n (frac32)^2n+1 = frac32 (frac92)^n \= 2n+1 choose 2n+12^n + 2n+1 choose 2n2^n-1 + cdots + 2n+1 choose n+1
$$

The two are equal.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









AndreasAndreas

8,5011137




8,5011137







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeEarnest I tried to check your point. I couldn't solve that issue, it is striking that the two sums have equal value, and the regions of convergence is fulfilled. Where is the (hidden) issue?
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas
    2 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MikeEarnest I tried to check your point. I couldn't solve that issue, it is striking that the two sums have equal value, and the regions of convergence is fulfilled. Where is the (hidden) issue?
    $endgroup$
    – Andreas
    2 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
I think something is awry. For $3^nf_2(1/3)$, the sum is infinite, but OP’s sum is finite.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I tried to check your point. I couldn't solve that issue, it is striking that the two sums have equal value, and the regions of convergence is fulfilled. Where is the (hidden) issue?
$endgroup$
– Andreas
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I tried to check your point. I couldn't solve that issue, it is striking that the two sums have equal value, and the regions of convergence is fulfilled. Where is the (hidden) issue?
$endgroup$
– Andreas
2 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3201479%2fhow-do-i-prove-this-combinatorial-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager