Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsDoes HttpCalloutMock work when the tested method doesn't return HttpResponse?Mock class not working with Dynamic & Unique end-pointHTTP Mock Response class has 0 coverageIs there a way to create more than 50000 records in a unit test context?Mock Service .setBody()Post callout behavior assertions for unit test with static resource callout mock failBasic Mock Test Coverage HelpHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Can we mock relationships in Apex?Method Is Not Visible: APEX Trailhead Unit Testing Challenge

Simulate round-robin tournament draw

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

What's called a person who work as someone who puts products on shelves in stores?

Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?

A journey... into the MIND

/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

Will I lose my paid in full property

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

Preserving file and folder permissions with rsync

Co-worker works way more than he should

Writing a T-SQL stored procedure to receive 4 numbers and insert them into a table

Why would the Overseers waste their stock of slaves on the Game?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers

Why is water being consumed when my shutoff valve is closed?

Is a self contained air-bullet cartridge feasible?

Israeli soda type drink

SQL Server placement of master database files vs resource database files

Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?

Why is arima in R one time step off?

Is it OK if I do not take the receipt in Germany?

Is it accepted to use working hours to read general interest books?



Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsDoes HttpCalloutMock work when the tested method doesn't return HttpResponse?Mock class not working with Dynamic & Unique end-pointHTTP Mock Response class has 0 coverageIs there a way to create more than 50000 records in a unit test context?Mock Service .setBody()Post callout behavior assertions for unit test with static resource callout mock failBasic Mock Test Coverage HelpHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Can we mock relationships in Apex?Method Is Not Visible: APEX Trailhead Unit Testing Challenge



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:



if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ... 


I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?










share|improve this question






























    2















    I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:



    if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ... 


    I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:



      if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ... 


      I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?










      share|improve this question
















      I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:



      if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ... 


      I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?







      unit-test mock






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 3 hours ago







      WEFX

















      asked 3 hours ago









      WEFXWEFX

      1538




      1538




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:



          public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper

          static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
          @TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;

          public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

          return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);


          // the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
          protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

          return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();




          Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.



          @IsTest
          class MyObjectHelperTests

          class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper

          Boolean isQueryable = true;
          protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

          return isQueryable;



          @IsTest static void testCannotQuery()

          HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
          mock.isQueryable = false;
          MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);

          Test.startTest();
          Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
          Test.stopTest();

          system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');







          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "459"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258841%2fis-there-a-way-to-fake-a-method-response-using-mock-or-stubs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:



            public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper

            static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
            @TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;

            public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

            return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);


            // the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
            protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

            return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();




            Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.



            @IsTest
            class MyObjectHelperTests

            class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper

            Boolean isQueryable = true;
            protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

            return isQueryable;



            @IsTest static void testCannotQuery()

            HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
            mock.isQueryable = false;
            MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);

            Test.startTest();
            Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
            Test.stopTest();

            system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');







            share|improve this answer



























              5














              I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:



              public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper

              static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
              @TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;

              public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

              return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);


              // the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
              protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

              return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();




              Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.



              @IsTest
              class MyObjectHelperTests

              class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper

              Boolean isQueryable = true;
              protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

              return isQueryable;



              @IsTest static void testCannotQuery()

              HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
              mock.isQueryable = false;
              MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);

              Test.startTest();
              Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
              Test.stopTest();

              system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');







              share|improve this answer

























                5












                5








                5







                I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:



                public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper

                static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
                @TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;

                public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

                return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);


                // the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
                protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

                return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();




                Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.



                @IsTest
                class MyObjectHelperTests

                class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper

                Boolean isQueryable = true;
                protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

                return isQueryable;



                @IsTest static void testCannotQuery()

                HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
                mock.isQueryable = false;
                MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);

                Test.startTest();
                Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
                Test.stopTest();

                system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');







                share|improve this answer













                I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:



                public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper

                static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
                @TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;

                public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

                return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);


                // the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
                protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

                return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();




                Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.



                @IsTest
                class MyObjectHelperTests

                class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper

                Boolean isQueryable = true;
                protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)

                return isQueryable;



                @IsTest static void testCannotQuery()

                HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
                mock.isQueryable = false;
                MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);

                Test.startTest();
                Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
                Test.stopTest();

                system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                Adrian LarsonAdrian Larson

                111k19121259




                111k19121259



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258841%2fis-there-a-way-to-fake-a-method-response-using-mock-or-stubs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

                    Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

                    Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager