Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsDoes HttpCalloutMock work when the tested method doesn't return HttpResponse?Mock class not working with Dynamic & Unique end-pointHTTP Mock Response class has 0 coverageIs there a way to create more than 50000 records in a unit test context?Mock Service .setBody()Post callout behavior assertions for unit test with static resource callout mock failBasic Mock Test Coverage HelpHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Can we mock relationships in Apex?Method Is Not Visible: APEX Trailhead Unit Testing Challenge
Simulate round-robin tournament draw
All ASCII characters with a given bit count
What's called a person who work as someone who puts products on shelves in stores?
Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?
A journey... into the MIND
/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls
What is a 'Key' in computer science?
Will I lose my paid in full property
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
Preserving file and folder permissions with rsync
Co-worker works way more than he should
Writing a T-SQL stored procedure to receive 4 numbers and insert them into a table
Why would the Overseers waste their stock of slaves on the Game?
Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?
Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?
Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers
Why is water being consumed when my shutoff valve is closed?
Is a self contained air-bullet cartridge feasible?
Israeli soda type drink
SQL Server placement of master database files vs resource database files
Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?
Why is arima in R one time step off?
Is it OK if I do not take the receipt in Germany?
Is it accepted to use working hours to read general interest books?
Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsDoes HttpCalloutMock work when the tested method doesn't return HttpResponse?Mock class not working with Dynamic & Unique end-pointHTTP Mock Response class has 0 coverageIs there a way to create more than 50000 records in a unit test context?Mock Service .setBody()Post callout behavior assertions for unit test with static resource callout mock failBasic Mock Test Coverage HelpHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Can we mock relationships in Apex?Method Is Not Visible: APEX Trailhead Unit Testing Challenge
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
add a comment |
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
add a comment |
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
unit-test mock
edited 3 hours ago
WEFX
asked 3 hours ago
WEFXWEFX
1538
1538
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258841%2fis-there-a-way-to-fake-a-method-response-using-mock-or-stubs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
add a comment |
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
add a comment |
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
answered 3 hours ago
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19121259
111k19121259
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258841%2fis-there-a-way-to-fake-a-method-response-using-mock-or-stubs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown