Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Can an abstract class have a constructor?Why do this() and super() have to be the first statement in a constructor?Why can't I change a private member of a class from a friend class in a different namespace?Passing a class as argument which has a private constructor that takes no parametersPrivate data members are inaccessible to friend functionFriend function is not accessing private members of another friend classDeclaring constructors as private shows errors. Is at least one public constructor mandatory?Cannot access private member declared in class, even declared friend classPrivate Data member is inaccessible in Friend FunctionPassing an object into the constructor of another class
Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class?
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls
Specify the range of GridLines
What is /etc/mtab in Linux?
Are there existing rules/lore for MTG planeswalkers?
How to keep bees out of canned beverages?
Why aren't road bicycle wheels tiny?
Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department
What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?
TV series episode where humans nuke aliens before decrypting their message that states they come in peace
What is the numbering system used for the DSN dishes?
When does Bran Stark remember Jamie pushing him?
Arriving in Atlanta (after US Preclearance in Dublin). Will I go through TSA security in Atlanta to transfer to a connecting flight?
Eigenvalues of the Laplacian of the directed De Bruijn graph
The 'gros' functor from schemes into (strictly) locally ringed topoi
How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?
What is the purpose of the side handle on a hand ("eggbeater") drill?
Is there a possibility to generate a list dynamically in Latex?
Why is arima in R one time step off?
Is there an efficient way for synchronising audio events real-time with LEDs using an MCU?
How to begin with a paragraph in latex
What does the black goddess statue do and what is it?
Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows
Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Can an abstract class have a constructor?Why do this() and super() have to be the first statement in a constructor?Why can't I change a private member of a class from a friend class in a different namespace?Passing a class as argument which has a private constructor that takes no parametersPrivate data members are inaccessible to friend functionFriend function is not accessing private members of another friend classDeclaring constructors as private shows errors. Is at least one public constructor mandatory?Cannot access private member declared in class, even declared friend classPrivate Data member is inaccessible in Friend FunctionPassing an object into the constructor of another class
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have two classes; Salary
that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee
that has an object of type class Salary
and some members like name and address of the employee...
What I want to do is to prevent
class Salary
from being instantiated and onlyclass Employee
can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors ofSalary
private and madeEmployee
friend ofSalary
. But I get errors:class Employee;
class Salary
public:
private:
Salary() : revenue_, cost_
Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
cost_ y
int revenue_, cost_;
friend class Employee;
;
class Employee
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessibleThe problem raised for me if I forward declare
main
:int main(int, char*[]);
And make
main
friend ofclass Salary
so in Salary:class Salary
//...
friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
;
Now the program compiles correctly!
*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:
Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?
c++ constructor friend-class
add a comment |
I have two classes; Salary
that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee
that has an object of type class Salary
and some members like name and address of the employee...
What I want to do is to prevent
class Salary
from being instantiated and onlyclass Employee
can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors ofSalary
private and madeEmployee
friend ofSalary
. But I get errors:class Employee;
class Salary
public:
private:
Salary() : revenue_, cost_
Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
cost_ y
int revenue_, cost_;
friend class Employee;
;
class Employee
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessibleThe problem raised for me if I forward declare
main
:int main(int, char*[]);
And make
main
friend ofclass Salary
so in Salary:class Salary
//...
friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
;
Now the program compiles correctly!
*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:
Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?
c++ constructor friend-class
Why are you makingSalary
's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to useSalary
outside ofEmployee
– J. Antonio Perez
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have two classes; Salary
that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee
that has an object of type class Salary
and some members like name and address of the employee...
What I want to do is to prevent
class Salary
from being instantiated and onlyclass Employee
can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors ofSalary
private and madeEmployee
friend ofSalary
. But I get errors:class Employee;
class Salary
public:
private:
Salary() : revenue_, cost_
Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
cost_ y
int revenue_, cost_;
friend class Employee;
;
class Employee
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessibleThe problem raised for me if I forward declare
main
:int main(int, char*[]);
And make
main
friend ofclass Salary
so in Salary:class Salary
//...
friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
;
Now the program compiles correctly!
*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:
Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?
c++ constructor friend-class
I have two classes; Salary
that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee
that has an object of type class Salary
and some members like name and address of the employee...
What I want to do is to prevent
class Salary
from being instantiated and onlyclass Employee
can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors ofSalary
private and madeEmployee
friend ofSalary
. But I get errors:class Employee;
class Salary
public:
private:
Salary() : revenue_, cost_
Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
cost_ y
int revenue_, cost_;
friend class Employee;
;
class Employee
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessibleThe problem raised for me if I forward declare
main
:int main(int, char*[]);
And make
main
friend ofclass Salary
so in Salary:class Salary
//...
friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
;
Now the program compiles correctly!
*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:
Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?
c++ constructor friend-class
c++ constructor friend-class
edited 1 hour ago
Syfu_H
asked 2 hours ago
Syfu_HSyfu_H
35518
35518
Why are you makingSalary
's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to useSalary
outside ofEmployee
– J. Antonio Perez
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Why are you makingSalary
's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to useSalary
outside ofEmployee
– J. Antonio Perez
1 hour ago
Why are you making
Salary
's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary
outside of Employee
– J. Antonio Perez
1 hour ago
Why are you making
Salary
's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary
outside of Employee
– J. Antonio Perez
1 hour ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee
the braces in your initialization Employee emp;
will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main()
. Since main()
doesn't have access to the Salary
constructor, it fails.
As others have pointed out, adding an Employee
default constructor will resolve your problem:
class Employee
public:
Employee() = default;
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
1
I'm trying on MSVS and onlyEmployee() ;
allowsEmployee emp;
to compile. Clang seems to acceptEmployee() = default;
, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.
– wally
1 hour ago
GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?
– wally
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee
thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization
:
class Employee
public:
Employee() // add it
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // now this should compile
add a comment |
You need Employee
's ctor to call the ctor of Salary
. The ctor of Salary
is not accessible from main
.
eg:
class Employee
public:
Employee() : sal()
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
add a comment |
If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).
1
I recommend explaining why.
– user4581301
1 hour ago
Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compilesEmployee emp;
but why?
– Syfu_H
1 hour ago
@Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization
– user4581301
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55819962%2fwhy-i-cannot-instantiate-a-class-whose-constructor-is-private-in-a-friend-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee
the braces in your initialization Employee emp;
will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main()
. Since main()
doesn't have access to the Salary
constructor, it fails.
As others have pointed out, adding an Employee
default constructor will resolve your problem:
class Employee
public:
Employee() = default;
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
1
I'm trying on MSVS and onlyEmployee() ;
allowsEmployee emp;
to compile. Clang seems to acceptEmployee() = default;
, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.
– wally
1 hour ago
GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?
– wally
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee
the braces in your initialization Employee emp;
will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main()
. Since main()
doesn't have access to the Salary
constructor, it fails.
As others have pointed out, adding an Employee
default constructor will resolve your problem:
class Employee
public:
Employee() = default;
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
1
I'm trying on MSVS and onlyEmployee() ;
allowsEmployee emp;
to compile. Clang seems to acceptEmployee() = default;
, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.
– wally
1 hour ago
GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?
– wally
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee
the braces in your initialization Employee emp;
will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main()
. Since main()
doesn't have access to the Salary
constructor, it fails.
As others have pointed out, adding an Employee
default constructor will resolve your problem:
class Employee
public:
Employee() = default;
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee
the braces in your initialization Employee emp;
will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main()
. Since main()
doesn't have access to the Salary
constructor, it fails.
As others have pointed out, adding an Employee
default constructor will resolve your problem:
class Employee
public:
Employee() = default;
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
zdanzdan
22.2k34864
22.2k34864
1
I'm trying on MSVS and onlyEmployee() ;
allowsEmployee emp;
to compile. Clang seems to acceptEmployee() = default;
, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.
– wally
1 hour ago
GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?
– wally
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
I'm trying on MSVS and onlyEmployee() ;
allowsEmployee emp;
to compile. Clang seems to acceptEmployee() = default;
, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.
– wally
1 hour ago
GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?
– wally
1 hour ago
1
1
I'm trying on MSVS and only
Employee() ;
allows Employee emp;
to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;
, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.– wally
1 hour ago
I'm trying on MSVS and only
Employee() ;
allows Employee emp;
to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;
, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.– wally
1 hour ago
GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?
– wally
1 hour ago
GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?
– wally
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee
thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization
:
class Employee
public:
Employee() // add it
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // now this should compile
add a comment |
You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee
thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization
:
class Employee
public:
Employee() // add it
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // now this should compile
add a comment |
You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee
thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization
:
class Employee
public:
Employee() // add it
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // now this should compile
You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee
thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization
:
class Employee
public:
Employee() // add it
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
int main()
Employee emp; // now this should compile
answered 1 hour ago
Raindrop7Raindrop7
3,74531224
3,74531224
add a comment |
add a comment |
You need Employee
's ctor to call the ctor of Salary
. The ctor of Salary
is not accessible from main
.
eg:
class Employee
public:
Employee() : sal()
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
add a comment |
You need Employee
's ctor to call the ctor of Salary
. The ctor of Salary
is not accessible from main
.
eg:
class Employee
public:
Employee() : sal()
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
add a comment |
You need Employee
's ctor to call the ctor of Salary
. The ctor of Salary
is not accessible from main
.
eg:
class Employee
public:
Employee() : sal()
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
You need Employee
's ctor to call the ctor of Salary
. The ctor of Salary
is not accessible from main
.
eg:
class Employee
public:
Employee() : sal()
public:
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;
edited 1 hour ago
Pavan Manjunath
20.1k1181108
20.1k1181108
answered 1 hour ago
schuessschuess
536416
536416
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).
1
I recommend explaining why.
– user4581301
1 hour ago
Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compilesEmployee emp;
but why?
– Syfu_H
1 hour ago
@Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization
– user4581301
1 hour ago
add a comment |
If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).
1
I recommend explaining why.
– user4581301
1 hour ago
Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compilesEmployee emp;
but why?
– Syfu_H
1 hour ago
@Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization
– user4581301
1 hour ago
add a comment |
If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).
If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).
answered 1 hour ago
Eric SokolowskyEric Sokolowsky
514
514
1
I recommend explaining why.
– user4581301
1 hour ago
Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compilesEmployee emp;
but why?
– Syfu_H
1 hour ago
@Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization
– user4581301
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
I recommend explaining why.
– user4581301
1 hour ago
Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compilesEmployee emp;
but why?
– Syfu_H
1 hour ago
@Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization
– user4581301
1 hour ago
1
1
I recommend explaining why.
– user4581301
1 hour ago
I recommend explaining why.
– user4581301
1 hour ago
Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles
Employee emp;
but why?– Syfu_H
1 hour ago
Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles
Employee emp;
but why?– Syfu_H
1 hour ago
@Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization
– user4581301
1 hour ago
@Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization
– user4581301
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55819962%2fwhy-i-cannot-instantiate-a-class-whose-constructor-is-private-in-a-friend-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why are you making
Salary
's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to useSalary
outside ofEmployee
– J. Antonio Perez
1 hour ago