What killed these X2 caps?iPhone programmable capswhat is the value of these capacitors?What are these capacitors?What is the difference between these circuit?what frequencies do caps filter?What are these electrolytic capacitors?Replace foil caps with ceramic caps?Dimensioning smoothing capacitor for China DIY LED lampWhat is the type of these caps?Are these circuits equivalents (caps in parallel with VCC)

Alternative to sending password over mail?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

Which is the best way to check return result?

What about the virus in 12 Monkeys?

Why didn't Miles's spider sense work before?

Forming a German sentence with/without the verb at the end

Calculating entropy change: reversible vs irreversible process

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

What do you call someone who asks many questions?

Venezuelan girlfriend wants to travel the USA to be with me. What is the process?

What are some good books on Machine Learning and AI like Krugman, Wells and Graddy's "Essentials of Economics"

How would I stat a creature to be immune to everything but the Magic Missile spell? (just for fun)

What exploit Are these user agents trying to use?

Should I cover my bicycle overnight while bikepacking?

Would Slavery Reparations be considered Bills of Attainder and hence Illegal?

Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for one more flight?

Unable to supress ligatures in headings which are set in Caps

What method can I use to design a dungeon difficult enough that the PCs can't make it through without killing them?

How to add frame around section using titlesec?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

Examples of smooth manifolds admitting inbetween one and a continuum of complex structures

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?



What killed these X2 caps?


iPhone programmable capswhat is the value of these capacitors?What are these capacitors?What is the difference between these circuit?what frequencies do caps filter?What are these electrolytic capacitors?Replace foil caps with ceramic caps?Dimensioning smoothing capacitor for China DIY LED lampWhat is the type of these caps?Are these circuits equivalents (caps in parallel with VCC)













7












$begingroup$


A few years ago, I designed an MCU-controlled dimmer driving a 150W mains halogen lamp. This is in Western Europe; 50Hz 230VAC. It uses X2-rated capacitors as capacitive droppers for the power supply, and another X2-rated capacitor for interference suppression:



Circuit diagram of MCU-controlled leading-edge phase cutting dimmer



The dimmer has gradually started misbehaving, and on debugging I found that all of the X2 caps have died (meaning they have less than 10% of their rated capacitance remaining):



Pictures of C1, C2, C5, Cnew



The caps in the picture:




  • C1, capacitive dropper, should be 100nF, measures 6.4nF


  • C2, capacitive dropper, should be 100nF, measures 6.9nF


  • C5, interference suppression, should be 100nF, measures 1.4nF


  • Cnew, fresh cap not from circuit, measures 93nF

All of them measure open circuit (>40MΩ) on resistance.



C1, C2, and Cnew are labeled MEX/TENTA MKP 0.1µF K X2 275VAC 40/100/21 [approval logos] EN 60384-14 01-14 250VAC; 275VAC nominal rated (significantly higher withstanding voltage, datasheet here). They are all from the same batch, bought in Sep 2016. I suspect 01-14 is a date code, so they'd be from early 2014.



C5 is from the same brand; it has virtually the same markings (except EN 132400), but is physically larger. I got it as part of some Velleman kit years ago, where it was also used as a suppression cap. No datasheet.



What caused these caps to lose their capacitance?



  • Is this deterioration normal behaviour for X2 caps? The dimmer saw a lot of use, being powered for an estimated 7000 hours.

  • Should I have derated the caps more? I agree 230VAC is pretty close to 275VAC, but as I understand it that is their nominal rating, and they should be able to handle transients way above that. Also, 275VAC seems by far the most common rating available on Digikey and the like.

  • Am I using the capacitors wrong somehow?

  • Are these capacitors from a bad brand/series/batch?









share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Western Europe is 50 Hz, not 60 Hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Transistor
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Transistor Of course! I'm not sure what I was thinking when I typed 60Hz... Thanks and fixed!
    $endgroup$
    – marcelm
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    230VAC is RMS, is the capacitor withstand specification of 275VAC peak or RMS? You're exposing these to a cyclic peak of 325V, nevermind abnormal conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Voigt
    10 mins ago















7












$begingroup$


A few years ago, I designed an MCU-controlled dimmer driving a 150W mains halogen lamp. This is in Western Europe; 50Hz 230VAC. It uses X2-rated capacitors as capacitive droppers for the power supply, and another X2-rated capacitor for interference suppression:



Circuit diagram of MCU-controlled leading-edge phase cutting dimmer



The dimmer has gradually started misbehaving, and on debugging I found that all of the X2 caps have died (meaning they have less than 10% of their rated capacitance remaining):



Pictures of C1, C2, C5, Cnew



The caps in the picture:




  • C1, capacitive dropper, should be 100nF, measures 6.4nF


  • C2, capacitive dropper, should be 100nF, measures 6.9nF


  • C5, interference suppression, should be 100nF, measures 1.4nF


  • Cnew, fresh cap not from circuit, measures 93nF

All of them measure open circuit (>40MΩ) on resistance.



C1, C2, and Cnew are labeled MEX/TENTA MKP 0.1µF K X2 275VAC 40/100/21 [approval logos] EN 60384-14 01-14 250VAC; 275VAC nominal rated (significantly higher withstanding voltage, datasheet here). They are all from the same batch, bought in Sep 2016. I suspect 01-14 is a date code, so they'd be from early 2014.



C5 is from the same brand; it has virtually the same markings (except EN 132400), but is physically larger. I got it as part of some Velleman kit years ago, where it was also used as a suppression cap. No datasheet.



What caused these caps to lose their capacitance?



  • Is this deterioration normal behaviour for X2 caps? The dimmer saw a lot of use, being powered for an estimated 7000 hours.

  • Should I have derated the caps more? I agree 230VAC is pretty close to 275VAC, but as I understand it that is their nominal rating, and they should be able to handle transients way above that. Also, 275VAC seems by far the most common rating available on Digikey and the like.

  • Am I using the capacitors wrong somehow?

  • Are these capacitors from a bad brand/series/batch?









share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Western Europe is 50 Hz, not 60 Hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Transistor
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Transistor Of course! I'm not sure what I was thinking when I typed 60Hz... Thanks and fixed!
    $endgroup$
    – marcelm
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    230VAC is RMS, is the capacitor withstand specification of 275VAC peak or RMS? You're exposing these to a cyclic peak of 325V, nevermind abnormal conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Voigt
    10 mins ago













7












7








7


1



$begingroup$


A few years ago, I designed an MCU-controlled dimmer driving a 150W mains halogen lamp. This is in Western Europe; 50Hz 230VAC. It uses X2-rated capacitors as capacitive droppers for the power supply, and another X2-rated capacitor for interference suppression:



Circuit diagram of MCU-controlled leading-edge phase cutting dimmer



The dimmer has gradually started misbehaving, and on debugging I found that all of the X2 caps have died (meaning they have less than 10% of their rated capacitance remaining):



Pictures of C1, C2, C5, Cnew



The caps in the picture:




  • C1, capacitive dropper, should be 100nF, measures 6.4nF


  • C2, capacitive dropper, should be 100nF, measures 6.9nF


  • C5, interference suppression, should be 100nF, measures 1.4nF


  • Cnew, fresh cap not from circuit, measures 93nF

All of them measure open circuit (>40MΩ) on resistance.



C1, C2, and Cnew are labeled MEX/TENTA MKP 0.1µF K X2 275VAC 40/100/21 [approval logos] EN 60384-14 01-14 250VAC; 275VAC nominal rated (significantly higher withstanding voltage, datasheet here). They are all from the same batch, bought in Sep 2016. I suspect 01-14 is a date code, so they'd be from early 2014.



C5 is from the same brand; it has virtually the same markings (except EN 132400), but is physically larger. I got it as part of some Velleman kit years ago, where it was also used as a suppression cap. No datasheet.



What caused these caps to lose their capacitance?



  • Is this deterioration normal behaviour for X2 caps? The dimmer saw a lot of use, being powered for an estimated 7000 hours.

  • Should I have derated the caps more? I agree 230VAC is pretty close to 275VAC, but as I understand it that is their nominal rating, and they should be able to handle transients way above that. Also, 275VAC seems by far the most common rating available on Digikey and the like.

  • Am I using the capacitors wrong somehow?

  • Are these capacitors from a bad brand/series/batch?









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




A few years ago, I designed an MCU-controlled dimmer driving a 150W mains halogen lamp. This is in Western Europe; 50Hz 230VAC. It uses X2-rated capacitors as capacitive droppers for the power supply, and another X2-rated capacitor for interference suppression:



Circuit diagram of MCU-controlled leading-edge phase cutting dimmer



The dimmer has gradually started misbehaving, and on debugging I found that all of the X2 caps have died (meaning they have less than 10% of their rated capacitance remaining):



Pictures of C1, C2, C5, Cnew



The caps in the picture:




  • C1, capacitive dropper, should be 100nF, measures 6.4nF


  • C2, capacitive dropper, should be 100nF, measures 6.9nF


  • C5, interference suppression, should be 100nF, measures 1.4nF


  • Cnew, fresh cap not from circuit, measures 93nF

All of them measure open circuit (>40MΩ) on resistance.



C1, C2, and Cnew are labeled MEX/TENTA MKP 0.1µF K X2 275VAC 40/100/21 [approval logos] EN 60384-14 01-14 250VAC; 275VAC nominal rated (significantly higher withstanding voltage, datasheet here). They are all from the same batch, bought in Sep 2016. I suspect 01-14 is a date code, so they'd be from early 2014.



C5 is from the same brand; it has virtually the same markings (except EN 132400), but is physically larger. I got it as part of some Velleman kit years ago, where it was also used as a suppression cap. No datasheet.



What caused these caps to lose their capacitance?



  • Is this deterioration normal behaviour for X2 caps? The dimmer saw a lot of use, being powered for an estimated 7000 hours.

  • Should I have derated the caps more? I agree 230VAC is pretty close to 275VAC, but as I understand it that is their nominal rating, and they should be able to handle transients way above that. Also, 275VAC seems by far the most common rating available on Digikey and the like.

  • Am I using the capacitors wrong somehow?

  • Are these capacitors from a bad brand/series/batch?






capacitor mains x-capacitor






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







marcelm

















asked 1 hour ago









marcelmmarcelm

1,3771716




1,3771716







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Western Europe is 50 Hz, not 60 Hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Transistor
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Transistor Of course! I'm not sure what I was thinking when I typed 60Hz... Thanks and fixed!
    $endgroup$
    – marcelm
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    230VAC is RMS, is the capacitor withstand specification of 275VAC peak or RMS? You're exposing these to a cyclic peak of 325V, nevermind abnormal conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Voigt
    10 mins ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Western Europe is 50 Hz, not 60 Hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Transistor
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Transistor Of course! I'm not sure what I was thinking when I typed 60Hz... Thanks and fixed!
    $endgroup$
    – marcelm
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    230VAC is RMS, is the capacitor withstand specification of 275VAC peak or RMS? You're exposing these to a cyclic peak of 325V, nevermind abnormal conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Voigt
    10 mins ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Western Europe is 50 Hz, not 60 Hz.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Western Europe is 50 Hz, not 60 Hz.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@Transistor Of course! I'm not sure what I was thinking when I typed 60Hz... Thanks and fixed!
$endgroup$
– marcelm
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@Transistor Of course! I'm not sure what I was thinking when I typed 60Hz... Thanks and fixed!
$endgroup$
– marcelm
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
230VAC is RMS, is the capacitor withstand specification of 275VAC peak or RMS? You're exposing these to a cyclic peak of 325V, nevermind abnormal conditions.
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
10 mins ago




$begingroup$
230VAC is RMS, is the capacitor withstand specification of 275VAC peak or RMS? You're exposing these to a cyclic peak of 325V, nevermind abnormal conditions.
$endgroup$
– Ben Voigt
10 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

The film capacitors are made to be "self healing" which just means that when they develop a short due to abuse the area around the short gets blown away, reducing the capacitance.



It appears your application has frequent transients either from within or without that exceed the design capability of the capacitors. You can try to track them down at the source, attempt to shunt them with something like a bipolar TVS across the caps, or buy better (higher voltage rated) capacitors.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Or X1 if they will fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Endl
    1 min ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430568%2fwhat-killed-these-x2-caps%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

The film capacitors are made to be "self healing" which just means that when they develop a short due to abuse the area around the short gets blown away, reducing the capacitance.



It appears your application has frequent transients either from within or without that exceed the design capability of the capacitors. You can try to track them down at the source, attempt to shunt them with something like a bipolar TVS across the caps, or buy better (higher voltage rated) capacitors.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Or X1 if they will fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Endl
    1 min ago















7












$begingroup$

The film capacitors are made to be "self healing" which just means that when they develop a short due to abuse the area around the short gets blown away, reducing the capacitance.



It appears your application has frequent transients either from within or without that exceed the design capability of the capacitors. You can try to track them down at the source, attempt to shunt them with something like a bipolar TVS across the caps, or buy better (higher voltage rated) capacitors.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Or X1 if they will fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Endl
    1 min ago













7












7








7





$begingroup$

The film capacitors are made to be "self healing" which just means that when they develop a short due to abuse the area around the short gets blown away, reducing the capacitance.



It appears your application has frequent transients either from within or without that exceed the design capability of the capacitors. You can try to track them down at the source, attempt to shunt them with something like a bipolar TVS across the caps, or buy better (higher voltage rated) capacitors.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The film capacitors are made to be "self healing" which just means that when they develop a short due to abuse the area around the short gets blown away, reducing the capacitance.



It appears your application has frequent transients either from within or without that exceed the design capability of the capacitors. You can try to track them down at the source, attempt to shunt them with something like a bipolar TVS across the caps, or buy better (higher voltage rated) capacitors.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany

212k5162428




212k5162428











  • $begingroup$
    Or X1 if they will fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Endl
    1 min ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Or X1 if they will fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Endl
    1 min ago















$begingroup$
Or X1 if they will fit.
$endgroup$
– Robert Endl
1 min ago




$begingroup$
Or X1 if they will fit.
$endgroup$
– Robert Endl
1 min ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430568%2fwhat-killed-these-x2-caps%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6