Request info on 12/48v PSUDoes the pin order matter for an EPS12V 8-pin +12V connector?DC PSU questions (+/- voltages, home-built ammeter)Current flow priorities in PSU / PSU reviewConnecting potentiometer to an ATX PSUATX power supply only 0.1A from 12V rail?Split External 5V PSU 4 waysNeed help interpreting a printer PS labelCan AC floating ground be used as a common ground to a DC circuit?Has Anyone Ever Gotten a Delta DPS-400AB-5 A PSU to Work Standalone?XBOX 360 PSU for walkie-talkie chargers

How do I color the graph in datavisualization?

Biological Blimps: Propulsion

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Should I outline or discovery write my stories?

What are the purposes of autoencoders?

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

Multiplicative persistence

Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Non-trope happy ending?

Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?

Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?

Loading commands from file

How to indicate a cut out for a product window

Is a bound state a stationary state?

I am looking for the correct translation of love for the phrase "in this sign love"

Why should universal income be universal?

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

Calculating Wattage for Resistor in High Frequency Application?

The screen of my macbook suddenly broken down how can I do to recover



Request info on 12/48v PSU


Does the pin order matter for an EPS12V 8-pin +12V connector?DC PSU questions (+/- voltages, home-built ammeter)Current flow priorities in PSU / PSU reviewConnecting potentiometer to an ATX PSUATX power supply only 0.1A from 12V rail?Split External 5V PSU 4 waysNeed help interpreting a printer PS labelCan AC floating ground be used as a common ground to a DC circuit?Has Anyone Ever Gotten a Delta DPS-400AB-5 A PSU to Work Standalone?XBOX 360 PSU for walkie-talkie chargers













1












$begingroup$


I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.



In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".



My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).



Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?



Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?



I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:



1) is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?



2) is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?



3) are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?



Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:



enter image description here









share









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – K. S.
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
    $endgroup$
    – stevieb
    5 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.



In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".



My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).



Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?



Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?



I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:



1) is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?



2) is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?



3) are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?



Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:



enter image description here









share









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – K. S.
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
    $endgroup$
    – stevieb
    5 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.



In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".



My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).



Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?



Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?



I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:



1) is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?



2) is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?



3) are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?



Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:



enter image description here









share









$endgroup$




I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.



In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".



My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).



Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?



Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?



I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:



1) is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?



2) is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?



3) are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?



Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:



enter image description here







power-supply





share












share










share



share










asked 5 hours ago









steviebstevieb

1265




1265







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – K. S.
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
    $endgroup$
    – stevieb
    5 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – K. S.
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
    $endgroup$
    – stevieb
    5 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
5 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428753%2frequest-info-on-12-48v-psu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



    Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



      Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



        Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



        Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 3 hours ago









        Jasen

        11.4k1531




        11.4k1531










        answered 4 hours ago









        HearthHearth

        4,6601137




        4,6601137



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428753%2frequest-info-on-12-48v-psu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

            Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

            Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager