Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owedFinding problems with house after purchaseMade an offer to buy an apartment, but the actual size is smaller than the one that was promised

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

Did Swami Prabhupada reject Advaita?

Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density

Must Legal Documents Be Siged In Standard Pen Colors?

Start making guitar arrangements

Why should universal income be universal?

Electoral considerations aside, what are potential benefits, for the US, of policy changes proposed by the tweet recognizing Golan annexation?

Is it possible to put a rectangle as background in the author section?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

How could a planet have erratic days?

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification

Added a new user on Ubuntu, set password not working?

Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

Longest common substring in linear time

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?



Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed


Finding problems with house after purchaseMade an offer to buy an apartment, but the actual size is smaller than the one that was promised













3















I am purchasing a house, and apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. His realtor is now asking me if I can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. Is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

    – CQM
    4 hours ago











  • In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

    – Lawrence
    1 hour ago







  • 2





    Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago






  • 2





    So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

    – Tas
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

    – J...
    42 mins ago















3















I am purchasing a house, and apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. His realtor is now asking me if I can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. Is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

    – CQM
    4 hours ago











  • In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

    – Lawrence
    1 hour ago







  • 2





    Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago






  • 2





    So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

    – Tas
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

    – J...
    42 mins ago













3












3








3








I am purchasing a house, and apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. His realtor is now asking me if I can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. Is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am purchasing a house, and apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. His realtor is now asking me if I can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. Is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?







house






share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 48 mins ago









Tas

1735




1735






New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









user83725user83725

161




161




New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

    – CQM
    4 hours ago











  • In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

    – Lawrence
    1 hour ago







  • 2





    Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago






  • 2





    So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

    – Tas
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

    – J...
    42 mins ago












  • 1





    you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

    – CQM
    4 hours ago











  • In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

    – Lawrence
    1 hour ago







  • 2





    Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago






  • 2





    So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

    – Tas
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

    – J...
    42 mins ago







1




1





you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

– CQM
4 hours ago





you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

– CQM
4 hours ago













In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

– Lawrence
1 hour ago






In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

– Lawrence
1 hour ago





2




2





Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

– corsiKa
1 hour ago





Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

– corsiKa
1 hour ago




2




2





So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

– Tas
1 hour ago





So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

– Tas
1 hour ago




1




1





This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

– J...
42 mins ago





This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

– J...
42 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















10














It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.






share|improve this answer























  • This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    2 hours ago











  • If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago









protected by JoeTaxpayer 47 mins ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10














It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.






share|improve this answer























  • This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    2 hours ago











  • If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago















10














It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.






share|improve this answer























  • This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    2 hours ago











  • If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago













10












10








10







It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.






share|improve this answer













It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









AganjuAganju

21.9k43578




21.9k43578












  • This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    2 hours ago











  • If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago

















  • This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    2 hours ago











  • If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago
















This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

– DJClayworth
3 hours ago





This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

– DJClayworth
3 hours ago




1




1





Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

– chepner
2 hours ago





Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

– chepner
2 hours ago













If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

– corsiKa
1 hour ago





If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

– corsiKa
1 hour ago





protected by JoeTaxpayer 47 mins ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



5lG1Z0yBatG4eE3dQa h2,5eusucSec,nkT 5G4a8QU06mQCSHgeb6i87g1i,jxxTL oHK,h3Iz,q3N2rb l 1k1 iA7JxPk3
h 81SNM6YObx,YI Fk 1pb1xX grAO6 F4Icv204XlllmgrJKkQrKOnaZbQ uU,TRj G773gqFyxT4hdX m Bmc9x3O38,7I,V,7Oq

Popular posts from this blog

Creating centerline of river in QGIS? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding centrelines from polygons in QGIS?Splitting line into two lines with GRASS GIS?Centroid of the equator and a pointpostgis: problems creating flow direction polyline; not all needed connections are drawnhow to make decent sense from scattered river depth measurementsQGIS Interpolation on Curved Grid (River DEMs)How to create automatic parking baysShortest path creation between two linesclipping layer using query builder in QGISFinding which side of closest polyline point lies on in QGIS?Create centerline from multi-digitized roadway lines Qgis 2.18Getting bathymetric contours confined only within river banks using QGIS?

What is the result of assigning to std::vector::begin()? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What does the explicit keyword mean?Concatenating two std::vectorsHow to find out if an item is present in a std::vector?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?What is the “-->” operator in C++?What is the easiest way to initialize a std::vector with hardcoded elements?What is The Rule of Three?What are the basic rules and idioms for operator overloading?Why are std::begin and std::end “not memory safe”?