Problem with TransformedDistributionCalculate probability functionWhen are `If`, `Piecewise`, `Switch`, and `Which` interchangeable and when are they not?Calculate PDF and CDF of a product of independent exponentially distributed random variablesConditional probabilityFullSimplify on TransformedDistributionNProbability not reliability analysis?TransformedDistribution using $k$ iid random variables, but $k$ not fixedConvolve discrete random variables efficientlyProbability distribution defined by partitioning an intervalDistribution of Function of Random Sum of Random Variables
Basic combinatorial probability problem
Is the U.S. Code copyrighted by the Government?
Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file
What does routing an IP address mean?
Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?
What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?
Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?
Is (0,1] a closed or open set?
Added a new user on Ubuntu, set password not working?
Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?
dpdt switch to spst switch
How can I block email signup overlays or javascript popups in Safari?
What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)
What is Cash Advance APR?
How to create ADT in Haskell?
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?
Why electric field inside a cavity of a non-conducting sphere not zero?
How to indicate a cut out for a product window
When were female captains banned from Starfleet?
Find the Primitive Roots Mod 31
Are paving bricks differently sized for sand bedding vs mortar bedding?
Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?
What was the exact wording from Ivanhoe of this advice on how to free yourself from slavery?
Problem with TransformedDistribution
Calculate probability functionWhen are `If`, `Piecewise`, `Switch`, and `Which` interchangeable and when are they not?Calculate PDF and CDF of a product of independent exponentially distributed random variablesConditional probabilityFullSimplify on TransformedDistributionNProbability not reliability analysis?TransformedDistribution using $k$ iid random variables, but $k$ not fixedConvolve discrete random variables efficientlyProbability distribution defined by partitioning an intervalDistribution of Function of Random Sum of Random Variables
$begingroup$
I am trying to use Mathematica to obtain the probability distribution of $frac12(A + B)$ where $A$ and $B$ are independent random variables each distributed according to the uniform distribution, with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively.
I suspect the distribution is triangular with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively and mode equal to $frac12(A + B)$. However, I am having difficulty using TransformedDistribution to show that.
My code is:
[ScriptCapitalD] = TransformedDistribution[1/2 (A + B), B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H], A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]
probability-or-statistics
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to use Mathematica to obtain the probability distribution of $frac12(A + B)$ where $A$ and $B$ are independent random variables each distributed according to the uniform distribution, with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively.
I suspect the distribution is triangular with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively and mode equal to $frac12(A + B)$. However, I am having difficulty using TransformedDistribution to show that.
My code is:
[ScriptCapitalD] = TransformedDistribution[1/2 (A + B), B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H], A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]
probability-or-statistics
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
$endgroup$
– user120911
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Did you tryPDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y] produces one expression with a denominator that looks correct, but the triangular distribution is split at the mode. Mathematica is not showing that. At least not in a way that is easy to see.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Are you awareTriangularDistribution[]is built-in?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Why not check the PDFs?Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to use Mathematica to obtain the probability distribution of $frac12(A + B)$ where $A$ and $B$ are independent random variables each distributed according to the uniform distribution, with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively.
I suspect the distribution is triangular with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively and mode equal to $frac12(A + B)$. However, I am having difficulty using TransformedDistribution to show that.
My code is:
[ScriptCapitalD] = TransformedDistribution[1/2 (A + B), B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H], A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]
probability-or-statistics
$endgroup$
I am trying to use Mathematica to obtain the probability distribution of $frac12(A + B)$ where $A$ and $B$ are independent random variables each distributed according to the uniform distribution, with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively.
I suspect the distribution is triangular with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively and mode equal to $frac12(A + B)$. However, I am having difficulty using TransformedDistribution to show that.
My code is:
[ScriptCapitalD] = TransformedDistribution[1/2 (A + B), B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H], A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]
probability-or-statistics
probability-or-statistics
edited 2 hours ago
user120911
asked 2 hours ago
user120911user120911
72428
72428
$begingroup$
That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
$endgroup$
– user120911
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Did you tryPDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y] produces one expression with a denominator that looks correct, but the triangular distribution is split at the mode. Mathematica is not showing that. At least not in a way that is easy to see.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Are you awareTriangularDistribution[]is built-in?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Why not check the PDFs?Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
$endgroup$
– user120911
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Did you tryPDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y] produces one expression with a denominator that looks correct, but the triangular distribution is split at the mode. Mathematica is not showing that. At least not in a way that is easy to see.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Are you awareTriangularDistribution[]is built-in?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Why not check the PDFs?Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
$endgroup$
– user120911
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
$endgroup$
– user120911
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Did you try
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?$endgroup$
– JimB
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Did you try
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?$endgroup$
– JimB
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y] produces one expression with a denominator that looks correct, but the triangular distribution is split at the mode. Mathematica is not showing that. At least not in a way that is easy to see.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y] produces one expression with a denominator that looks correct, but the triangular distribution is split at the mode. Mathematica is not showing that. At least not in a way that is easy to see.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Are you aware
TriangularDistribution[] is built-in?$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Are you aware
TriangularDistribution[] is built-in?$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Why not check the PDFs?
Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Why not check the PDFs?
Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps
[ScriptCapitalD] =
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]
(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]
(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100
For plotting, assign values to L and H:
L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]

pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]

$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193838%2fproblem-with-transformeddistribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps
[ScriptCapitalD] =
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]
(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps
[ScriptCapitalD] =
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]
(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps
[ScriptCapitalD] =
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]
(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)
$endgroup$
You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps
[ScriptCapitalD] =
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]
(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)
answered 1 hour ago
Bob HanlonBob Hanlon
60.9k33597
60.9k33597
$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]
(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100
For plotting, assign values to L and H:
L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]

pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]

$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]
(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100
For plotting, assign values to L and H:
L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]

pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]

$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]
(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100
For plotting, assign values to L and H:
L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]

pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]

$endgroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]
(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100
For plotting, assign values to L and H:
L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]

pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]

answered 1 hour ago
kglrkglr
189k10206424
189k10206424
$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193838%2fproblem-with-transformeddistribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
$endgroup$
– user120911
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Did you try
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?$endgroup$
– JimB
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y] produces one expression with a denominator that looks correct, but the triangular distribution is split at the mode. Mathematica is not showing that. At least not in a way that is easy to see.
$endgroup$
– user120911
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Are you aware
TriangularDistribution[]is built-in?$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
Why not check the PDFs?
Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
1 hour ago