High Q peak in frequency response means what in time domain? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What circuit can use a falling edge to trigger this damped oscillating impulse waveform?Frequency response?How do PID controllers effect time domain and frequency domain responseMaximum Response time meaning?Questions about modelling a typical crystal radio and simulating in LTspiceWhat improved frequency response means?Some questions on a passive network's transfer function and time domain responseMid- and lowband frequency response of CEFrequency domain representationHigh frequency response of capacitors

Derivation tree not rendering

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem

How to pronounce 1ターン?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

How should I replace vector<uint8_t>::const_iterator in an API?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?

Searching for a differential characteristic (differential cryptanalysis)

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

Sort a list of pairs representing an acyclic, partial automorphism

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

When did F become S in typeography, and why?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Do warforged have souls?

Simulating Exploding Dice

How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?



High Q peak in frequency response means what in time domain?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What circuit can use a falling edge to trigger this damped oscillating impulse waveform?Frequency response?How do PID controllers effect time domain and frequency domain responseMaximum Response time meaning?Questions about modelling a typical crystal radio and simulating in LTspiceWhat improved frequency response means?Some questions on a passive network's transfer function and time domain responseMid- and lowband frequency response of CEFrequency domain representationHigh frequency response of capacitors



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


Reading Linear Circuit Transfer Functions and one of the graphs got me curious.



I've recreated the circuit (series RLC) and plotted the frequency response for a Q of 7.



enter image description here



We have a peak of ~16.3 dB when Q is 7 @ 10Khz.



Can this value be used (16.3 dB) to accurately predict something in the time domain - such as the value of Q or how long the oscillatory decay would take, the amplitude of the oscillations etc.. ?



Added in case its relevent
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago

















1












$begingroup$


Reading Linear Circuit Transfer Functions and one of the graphs got me curious.



I've recreated the circuit (series RLC) and plotted the frequency response for a Q of 7.



enter image description here



We have a peak of ~16.3 dB when Q is 7 @ 10Khz.



Can this value be used (16.3 dB) to accurately predict something in the time domain - such as the value of Q or how long the oscillatory decay would take, the amplitude of the oscillations etc.. ?



Added in case its relevent
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Reading Linear Circuit Transfer Functions and one of the graphs got me curious.



I've recreated the circuit (series RLC) and plotted the frequency response for a Q of 7.



enter image description here



We have a peak of ~16.3 dB when Q is 7 @ 10Khz.



Can this value be used (16.3 dB) to accurately predict something in the time domain - such as the value of Q or how long the oscillatory decay would take, the amplitude of the oscillations etc.. ?



Added in case its relevent
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Reading Linear Circuit Transfer Functions and one of the graphs got me curious.



I've recreated the circuit (series RLC) and plotted the frequency response for a Q of 7.



enter image description here



We have a peak of ~16.3 dB when Q is 7 @ 10Khz.



Can this value be used (16.3 dB) to accurately predict something in the time domain - such as the value of Q or how long the oscillatory decay would take, the amplitude of the oscillations etc.. ?



Added in case its relevent
enter image description here







passive-networks frequency-response






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago







efox29

















asked 6 hours ago









efox29efox29

8,06953481




8,06953481











  • $begingroup$
    How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago













$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
$endgroup$
– efox29
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
$endgroup$
– efox29
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago













$begingroup$
Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √1+Q² so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f432436%2fhigh-q-peak-in-frequency-response-means-what-in-time-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √1+Q² so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$

Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √1+Q² so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$

Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









Dan MillsDan Mills

12.2k11225




12.2k11225











  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √1+Q² so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √1+Q² so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago
















$begingroup$
It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
$endgroup$
– efox29
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
$endgroup$
– efox29
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
I though Av= √1+Q² so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
I though Av= √1+Q² so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f432436%2fhigh-q-peak-in-frequency-response-means-what-in-time-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager