Closed subgroups of abelian groupsEmbedded Lie subgroups are closed.The injectivity of torus in the category of abelian Lie groupsCenter of compact lie group closed?Closedness of connected semisimple Lie subgroups of semisimple groupsIntersection of a family of closed Lie subgroupsExamples about maximal Abelian subgroup is not a maximal torus in compact connected Lie group $G$.A question on abelian Lie groups and maximal compact subgroupReal and complex nilpotent Lie groupsClosed Subgroups of Lie Groups are closed Lie Subgroups?Lattice and abelian Lie groups

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

least quadratic residue under GRH: an EXPLICIT bound

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Should I join an office cleaning event for free?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

How do I create uniquely male characters?

Can you lasso down a wizard who is using the Levitate spell?

Patience, young "Padovan"

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

Showing the closure of a compact subset need not be compact

Circuitry of TV splitters

What is the white spray-pattern residue inside these Falcon Heavy nozzles?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

cryptic clue: mammal sounds like relative consumer (8)

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Simulate Bitwise Cyclic Tag



Closed subgroups of abelian groups


Embedded Lie subgroups are closed.The injectivity of torus in the category of abelian Lie groupsCenter of compact lie group closed?Closedness of connected semisimple Lie subgroups of semisimple groupsIntersection of a family of closed Lie subgroupsExamples about maximal Abelian subgroup is not a maximal torus in compact connected Lie group $G$.A question on abelian Lie groups and maximal compact subgroupReal and complex nilpotent Lie groupsClosed Subgroups of Lie Groups are closed Lie Subgroups?Lattice and abelian Lie groups













3












$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    3 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    3 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?







general-topology differential-geometry lie-groups lie-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Clayton

19.6k33288




19.6k33288










asked 5 hours ago









Amrat AAmrat A

345111




345111







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    3 hours ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    3 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
$endgroup$
– Randall
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
$endgroup$
– Randall
3 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago


















4












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    2 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179002%2fclosed-subgroups-of-abelian-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago















2












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Alex YoucisAlex Youcis

36.1k775115




36.1k775115











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
4 hours ago













$begingroup$
@AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AmratA Updated.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA Updated.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago











4












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    2 hours ago















4












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    2 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









RandallRandall

10.7k11431




10.7k11431







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    2 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    2 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
2 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179002%2fclosed-subgroups-of-abelian-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







H6BzjOE7pY ua,yboulG5dPZGuw,r9Uje,hOEH2S7w jNVzDVM6PQ X
ip6cKuOuNuQY6

Popular posts from this blog

Creating centerline of river in QGIS? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding centrelines from polygons in QGIS?Splitting line into two lines with GRASS GIS?Centroid of the equator and a pointpostgis: problems creating flow direction polyline; not all needed connections are drawnhow to make decent sense from scattered river depth measurementsQGIS Interpolation on Curved Grid (River DEMs)How to create automatic parking baysShortest path creation between two linesclipping layer using query builder in QGISFinding which side of closest polyline point lies on in QGIS?Create centerline from multi-digitized roadway lines Qgis 2.18Getting bathymetric contours confined only within river banks using QGIS?

What is the result of assigning to std::vector::begin()? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What does the explicit keyword mean?Concatenating two std::vectorsHow to find out if an item is present in a std::vector?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?What is the “-->” operator in C++?What is the easiest way to initialize a std::vector with hardcoded elements?What is The Rule of Three?What are the basic rules and idioms for operator overloading?Why are std::begin and std::end “not memory safe”?