Chess with symmetric move-squareCopycat chess is backEqual Chess ControlEqual Chess Control With One ColorTwo knights jousting on a chessboardThe knight's gameThe Knight Checker or Football ChessA Battle of Dysfunctional Kings (Chess)Fabi and Mag played chess againKnight Checker PuzzleThe ability-swap-circle chessCopycat chess is back

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

TGV timetables / schedules?

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Set-theoretical foundations of Mathematics with only bounded quantifiers

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Why are only specific transaction types accepted into the mempool?

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

How is this relation reflexive?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

Why is an old chain unsafe?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?



Chess with symmetric move-square


Copycat chess is backEqual Chess ControlEqual Chess Control With One ColorTwo knights jousting on a chessboardThe knight's gameThe Knight Checker or Football ChessA Battle of Dysfunctional Kings (Chess)Fabi and Mag played chess againKnight Checker PuzzleThe ability-swap-circle chessCopycat chess is back













3












$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago















3












$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Every move in chess involves moving a piece to a square. Let us call this square the "move-square" for that turn.



In the following, the move-square of the black player must be symmetrical (over the obvious center-horizontal) to the move-square by white on that turn. The requirements may be met with a white move, but an additional valid move for black must be shown to exist. This extra move is not included when counting the number of moves taken to reach one of the below conditions.




What is the shortest sequence (with symmetrical move-squares) resulting in a Rook x Rook capture?

Resulting in a Knight x Rook capture?

Resulting in Queen x Bishop capture?








chess checkerboard knight-moves






share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 47 mins ago









Brandon_J

3,558244




3,558244






New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Artem LuginArtem Lugin

162




162




New contributor




Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Artem Lugin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the welcome
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
    $endgroup$
    – PiIsNot3
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Hi @ArtemLugin, welcome to Puzzling SE! (Take the tour if you haven't already!) Can you clarify if the same piece has to occupy black's move-square as white's, or can any piece count? For example, would something like 1. e4 e5 2. Be2 Ne2 be acceptable? Or is only Be7 by black possible?
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@PiIsNot3 Its doesn't have to be the same piece. Only the corresponding symmetric square. Assuming you mean Ne7 not Ne2 yes, thats acceptable
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Thanks for the welcome
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I can't accept your edit as it contains improper grammar and is inaccurate. I'm open to suggestions and edits to improve understandability
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I think the question is clear enough, perhaps some terminology can be fixed but at least I can tell what’s being asked
$endgroup$
– PiIsNot3
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    37 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    23 mins ago


















2












$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    4 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81507%2fchess-with-symmetric-move-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    37 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    23 mins ago















2












$begingroup$

Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    37 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    23 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Under your rules, here are my answers.



Rook X Rook:




1. g4 g5 2. h4 h5 3. gxh5 gxh4 4. h6 h3 5. h7 h2 6. hxg8=R hxg1=R 7. Rgxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Knight X Rook:




1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Nh4 Nh5 3. Ng6 Ng3 4. Nxh8




Proof Game:




Apronus




Queen X Bishop:




1. e4 e5 2. d4 d5 3. Bg5 Bg4 4. Qxg4




Proof Game:




Apronus




UPDATE: Do you mean improve my Rook X Rook game like this?




1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. Rxb6




Proof Game:




https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/?m=a4_a5_Ra3_Ra6_Rb3_Rb6_Rxb6








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 18 mins ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay

56615




56615











  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    37 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    23 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    True, but generally any variant will suffice.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    37 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    31 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    23 mins ago















$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
The game only has to end with one side capturing. So therefore it is correct.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
59 mins ago





$begingroup$
Fixed. Your point has been well recievedl
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
59 mins ago













$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
37 mins ago




$begingroup$
True, but generally any variant will suffice.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
37 mins ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago




$begingroup$
Oooh, I found one I really like. Looks kind of flashy IMO: 1.e4 e5 2. Qe2 Be7 3. Qb5 Bb4 4. Qxb4
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
31 mins ago












$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
23 mins ago




$begingroup$
Great solutions. RookxRook can be improved
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
23 mins ago











2












$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    4 mins ago















2












$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    4 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Partial (will update as I go)



R x R (2nd attempt)




I found a 6 move solution:

1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rb3 Rb6 4. c3 Nc6 5. Rb5 Nb4 6. cxb4 Rxb5

Apronus link




R x R (1st attempt)




This question demonstrates a 7 move sequence, but since we don’t have to copy each others’ moves, only the squares, we can also do the more interesting


1. a4 a5 2. Ra3 Ra6 3. Rc3 Nc6 4. e4 Ne5 5. Rc5 Nc4 6. c3 Rc6 7. Bxc4 Rxc5

Apronus link








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 9 mins ago

























answered 1 hour ago









PiIsNot3PiIsNot3

1,772124




1,772124











  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    4 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
    $endgroup$
    – Artem Lugin
    4 mins ago















$begingroup$
You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
4 mins ago




$begingroup$
You're on the right track. There are several ways to get it in 5 moves with white capturing the piece
$endgroup$
– Artem Lugin
4 mins ago










Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Artem Lugin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81507%2fchess-with-symmetric-move-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager