Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraNew blog post: When Gods FearHow would medieval civilizations be changed if lands were seas and seas were lands?What society might survive the 3 generation ruleWhich crops to save to best ensure survival?Forest rebels and the animal brigadeThe Tibetan BristleconeIf a group of wizards is stranded on a small jungle island with deadly tigers, how can they survive a month?Would humankind be today's dominant species, if all animals turned twice as big 2000 years ago?Could an entire civilization live in an upside down forest?What qualities could a hominid evolve to make it a better farmer?How could intelligent animals defend against humans?

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

401(k) cost basis

How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?

My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

How to open locks without disable device?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

How to count in linear time worst-case?

My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

Is Electric Central Heating worth it if using Solar Panels?

With indentation set to `0em`, when using a line break, there is still an indentation of a size of a space

c++ diamond problem - How to call base method only once

"My boss was furious with me and I have been fired" vs. "My boss was furious with me and I was fired"

What do you call the part of a novel that is not dialog?

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

Why is an operator the quantum mechanical analogue of an observable?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

SQL Query not selecting all points that it should?

Book with legacy programming code on a space ship that the main character hacks to escape

std::is_constructible on incomplete types

Putting Ant-Man on house arrest

Second order approximation of the loss function (Deep learning book, 7.33)



Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
New blog post: When Gods FearHow would medieval civilizations be changed if lands were seas and seas were lands?What society might survive the 3 generation ruleWhich crops to save to best ensure survival?Forest rebels and the animal brigadeThe Tibetan BristleconeIf a group of wizards is stranded on a small jungle island with deadly tigers, how can they survive a month?Would humankind be today's dominant species, if all animals turned twice as big 2000 years ago?Could an entire civilization live in an upside down forest?What qualities could a hominid evolve to make it a better farmer?How could intelligent animals defend against humans?










12












$begingroup$


In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?



They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Onix
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    3 hours ago















12












$begingroup$


In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?



They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Onix
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    3 hours ago













12












12








12


1



$begingroup$


In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?



They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




In my story, there is a civilization living in the Amazon rainforest. They need some time of mount that is adapted to the forest. I don't think horses can survive by themselves in there, so I was thinking, can moose/elk survive in the Amazon rainforest?



They would have been transported by ship there, but would they be able to survive? If not, is there an adaptation I need to make to the moose/elk? Maybe an artificially select species?







environment fauna survival domestication mounts






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Cyn

12.3k12758




12.3k12758










asked 5 hours ago









OnixOnix

1646




1646







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Onix
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    3 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Onix
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    3 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Hi Onix, I changed around some tags and you should check them and make sure they work for you. I took out evolution because your question isn't about them evolving but rather if they can survive as a foreign species transported there.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Cyn I put evolution because I do think that some artificial selection would take part in helping the species surviving there, but thinking about it I do agree that it's best if evolution is removed. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Onix
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Please note that we strongly encourage users to wait at least 24 hours before accepting an answer, as doing so may discourage other, better answers from being posted.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I feel like I need to ask what your civilization is using these mounts for. Generally the thicker the terrain, the less useful mounted travel actually is, because you're spending more effort making pathways the mounts can travel through than you're gaining back by not Just Walking.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
3 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















14












$begingroup$

No, but plenty of their relatives can



A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.




  • Bongo

  • Lowland Anoa

  • Okapi

These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:




  • Water Buffalo

  • Asian Elephant

Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:




  • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


  • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


  • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


  • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)

For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    14












    $begingroup$

    Actual brazillian here.



    The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



    It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:



    • Populated by piranhas;

    • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

    • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.

    Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



    Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



    We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



    The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



    When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:



    • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

    • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

    • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translated roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      1 hour ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      38 mins ago


















    13












    $begingroup$

    There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



    enter image description here



    In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



    By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
      $endgroup$
      – F1Krazy
      3 hours ago






    • 13




      $begingroup$
      Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      2 hours ago







    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
      $endgroup$
      – MrSpudtastic
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      44 mins ago


















    6












    $begingroup$

    Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145675%2fcould-moose-elk-survive-in-the-amazon-forest%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      14












      $begingroup$

      No, but plenty of their relatives can



      A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.




      • Bongo

      • Lowland Anoa

      • Okapi

      These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:




      • Water Buffalo

      • Asian Elephant

      Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:




      • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


      • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


      • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


      • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)

      For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        14












        $begingroup$

        No, but plenty of their relatives can



        A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.




        • Bongo

        • Lowland Anoa

        • Okapi

        These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:




        • Water Buffalo

        • Asian Elephant

        Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:




        • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


        • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


        • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


        • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)

        For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          14












          14








          14





          $begingroup$

          No, but plenty of their relatives can



          A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.




          • Bongo

          • Lowland Anoa

          • Okapi

          These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:




          • Water Buffalo

          • Asian Elephant

          Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:




          • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


          • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


          • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


          • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)

          For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          No, but plenty of their relatives can



          A moose or elk would die in the high heat and with limited resistance to insects and such. They simply aren't designed for the rainforest. However, there are plenty of animals large enough to mount that are native to a rainforest, and a rainforest alone.




          • Bongo

          • Lowland Anoa

          • Okapi

          These animals are not domesticated, so there is one difficulty. In addition, there are several animals that don't live strictly in rainforests, but are domesticated:




          • Water Buffalo

          • Asian Elephant

          Finally, since you mention the Amazon specifically, there are more appropriate animals that are large enough to mount that you could assume were domesticated there. The list of potential mounts gets much larger if you include recently extinct megafauna of South America:




          • Baird's Tapir (still alive!)


          • Stegomastodon/Notiomastodon (taxonomy debated, extinct either way)


          • Macrauchenia (not certain this genus' exact habitat)


          • Toxodon (again, not certain if this species actually lived in the rainforest)

          For the extinct species, it is worth pointing out that if they left fossils in the Amazon, there is basically no way the bones would have survived to the present day; the rainforest being perhaps the worst possible environment for bone preservation.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 4 hours ago









          kingledionkingledion

          75.4k26248440




          75.4k26248440





















              14












              $begingroup$

              Actual brazillian here.



              The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



              It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:



              • Populated by piranhas;

              • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

              • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.

              Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



              Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



              We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



              The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



              When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:



              • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

              • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

              • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translated roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.





              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 4




                $begingroup$
                I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
                $endgroup$
                – Willk
                1 hour ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
                $endgroup$
                – Cyn
                38 mins ago















              14












              $begingroup$

              Actual brazillian here.



              The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



              It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:



              • Populated by piranhas;

              • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

              • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.

              Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



              Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



              We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



              The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



              When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:



              • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

              • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

              • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translated roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.





              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 4




                $begingroup$
                I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
                $endgroup$
                – Willk
                1 hour ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
                $endgroup$
                – Cyn
                38 mins ago













              14












              14








              14





              $begingroup$

              Actual brazillian here.



              The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



              It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:



              • Populated by piranhas;

              • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

              • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.

              Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



              Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



              We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



              The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



              When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:



              • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

              • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

              • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translated roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.





              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Actual brazillian here.



              The reason why you won't find any mountable animals in the amazon rain forest is because it's kinda like a more green, lush version of Australia, in the aspect that half of the biomass is out to kill you in horrible ways.



              It is a [redacted] to go through the jungle, on foot or otherwise. And the river waters can be classified in three types:



              • Populated by piranhas;

              • Populated by alligators, which eat piranhas (besides cattle and humans);

              • Too polluted to allow for piranhas or alligators.

              Before western civilization started messing up the ecosystem, indigenous populations would make the water closer to their villages swimming safe by ingenuous application of poison vine essences, which paralyze the piranhas.



              Back on land you have 20-cm wide tarantulas whose venom will give you a three-days long constant erection. That would be funny if it weren't for the risk of penile gangrene. Then there are vampire bats, which can carry rabies.



              We also have jaguars. They hunt alligators underwater, and they mimic birds and monkeys to lure and eat them on tree canopies. There are reports of jaguars being able to mimic the cries of human babies. Jaguars are loathed by farmers because when they get out of the jungles and into farmlands, they sneak into fences by night to kill cattle.



              The icing on the cake are the anacondas. They are sneaky as hell, swim faster than you, and unlike rap music anacondas they will want some even if you've got no buns. They are not picky and will eat cattle and humans. If you raise elks in the rain forest, they will become anaconda food faster than you can say "god [redacted]!".



              When people do raise cattle in the north of Brazil, it's always one of these three situations:



              • Cattle raised on farmlands - lands that are no longer forest;

              • Cattle that is confined to very tight fences and allowed to walk only where it's deemed to be safe, usually raised by small, poor families. The poor critters usually live in areas smaller than an acre;

              • Then there is the third type. We have an expression, "boi de piranha"... It translated roughly to "the ox that belongs to the piranhas". These are raised for the sole purpose of making river crossing safer. When you wish to cross piranha infested waters, you send the critter first and wait until the feeding frenzy stops before you go. Usually the piranhas get full and sated with the ox and leave you alone. This is about the only use you will have for an elk this side of the equator.






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 51 mins ago

























              answered 4 hours ago









              RenanRenan

              54.4k15123269




              54.4k15123269







              • 4




                $begingroup$
                I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
                $endgroup$
                – Willk
                1 hour ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
                $endgroup$
                – Cyn
                38 mins ago












              • 4




                $begingroup$
                I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
                $endgroup$
                – Willk
                1 hour ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
                $endgroup$
                – Cyn
                38 mins ago







              4




              4




              $begingroup$
              I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
              $endgroup$
              – Willk
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              I have a vision of a movie where there is one anglo dude who is referred to as "boi de piranha" by his fellow soldiers. He thinks it is because he is a badass piranha boi. That is not why.
              $endgroup$
              – Willk
              1 hour ago




              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
              $endgroup$
              – Cyn
              38 mins ago




              $begingroup$
              Love the level of detail (though I'll love it from a distance, thank you). Glad to see an answer from someone who's actually lived in the area.
              $endgroup$
              – Cyn
              38 mins ago











              13












              $begingroup$

              There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



              enter image description here



              In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



              By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                $endgroup$
                – Liam Morris
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
                $endgroup$
                – F1Krazy
                3 hours ago






              • 13




                $begingroup$
                Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                2 hours ago







              • 6




                $begingroup$
                Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
                $endgroup$
                – MrSpudtastic
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
                $endgroup$
                – Cyn
                44 mins ago















              13












              $begingroup$

              There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



              enter image description here



              In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



              By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                $endgroup$
                – Liam Morris
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
                $endgroup$
                – F1Krazy
                3 hours ago






              • 13




                $begingroup$
                Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                2 hours ago







              • 6




                $begingroup$
                Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
                $endgroup$
                – MrSpudtastic
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
                $endgroup$
                – Cyn
                44 mins ago













              13












              13








              13





              $begingroup$

              There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



              enter image description here



              In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



              By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$



              There are Buffalos in the Amazon (in the Brazilian state of Pará):



              enter image description here



              In addition, although not in the rainforest properly, but close, there is the Marsh deer.



              By the way, there are wild horses in the Amazon.







              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 52 mins ago









              Renan

              54.4k15123269




              54.4k15123269






              New contributor




              Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 4 hours ago









              Non Playable CharacterNon Playable Character

              1313




              1313




              New contributor




              Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              Non Playable Character is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.











              • $begingroup$
                This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                $endgroup$
                – Liam Morris
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
                $endgroup$
                – F1Krazy
                3 hours ago






              • 13




                $begingroup$
                Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                2 hours ago







              • 6




                $begingroup$
                Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
                $endgroup$
                – MrSpudtastic
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
                $endgroup$
                – Cyn
                44 mins ago
















              • $begingroup$
                This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
                $endgroup$
                – Liam Morris
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
                $endgroup$
                – F1Krazy
                3 hours ago






              • 13




                $begingroup$
                Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                2 hours ago







              • 6




                $begingroup$
                Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
                $endgroup$
                – MrSpudtastic
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
                $endgroup$
                – Cyn
                44 mins ago















              $begingroup$
              This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
              $endgroup$
              – Liam Morris
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
              $endgroup$
              – Liam Morris
              3 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
              $endgroup$
              – F1Krazy
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Please don't circumvent the reputation system by posting comments as answers. It sucks for newbies, I know, but it's there for a reason.
              $endgroup$
              – F1Krazy
              3 hours ago




              13




              13




              $begingroup$
              Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Renan
              2 hours ago





              $begingroup$
              Despite this guy's remark on commenting, this seems like an actual valid answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Renan
              2 hours ago





              6




              6




              $begingroup$
              Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              Though you shouldn't answer to make a comment, this "comment" looks like a good base for an answer. I might suggest you edit out the "[can't] comment on kingledion answer" part and just present the rest as evidence that a moose or elk could survive in the rainforest.
              $endgroup$
              – MrSpudtastic
              1 hour ago




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
              $endgroup$
              – Cyn
              44 mins ago




              $begingroup$
              I agree...it's sparse but it's enough to count as an answer. Plus the awesome picture.
              $endgroup$
              – Cyn
              44 mins ago











              6












              $begingroup$

              Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                6












                $begingroup$

                Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Putting climate and disease environment aside, because kingledion covered them, there is the issue of antlers and rainforest growth. Rainforests don't have an open understory the way mature conifer or oak woodlands do, as such anything that grows a large rack of antlers is seriously maladapted to moving around and feeding in the environment. There is evidence of several moose/elk species dying out because when their environment became forested because of this very issue, most notably the Irish Elk.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 4 hours ago









                  AshAsh

                  26.9k467152




                  26.9k467152



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145675%2fcould-moose-elk-survive-in-the-amazon-forest%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

                      Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

                      Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6