Get name of standard action overriden in Visualforce contorller The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inapex:actionFunction action doesn't seem to work the same as apex:commandButton actionVisualforce page(table) doesn't rerenderShowing visualforce pages to Communities users, but standard Salesforce pages to all other users, without writing a dozen controller extensions!How to detect button action in controller that is associated with overriden Visualforce page?standard delete button on a custom vf pageOverride Standard View Button and Inline Editing DisabledCan a single VF page override both a standard action and a list action?Issue with StandardController addFields() on WorkOrder sObjectVisualforce - infinite redirection loopStandard controller and extension method with same name

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Match Roman Numerals

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic wars mean?

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

Can there be female White Walkers?

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

$EDITOR environment variable won't set

Does adding complexity mean a more secure cipher?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Compute the product of 3 dictionaries and concatenate keys and values

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Is it possible for absolutely everyone to attain enlightenment?

Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview

"as much details as you can remember"

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly defeats?



Get name of standard action overriden in Visualforce contorller



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inapex:actionFunction action doesn't seem to work the same as apex:commandButton actionVisualforce page(table) doesn't rerenderShowing visualforce pages to Communities users, but standard Salesforce pages to all other users, without writing a dozen controller extensions!How to detect button action in controller that is associated with overriden Visualforce page?standard delete button on a custom vf pageOverride Standard View Button and Inline Editing DisabledCan a single VF page override both a standard action and a list action?Issue with StandardController addFields() on WorkOrder sObjectVisualforce - infinite redirection loopStandard controller and extension method with same name



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I have a visualforce page that overrides both the 'New' and 'Edit' Buttons of a custom object. In my controller extension how can I get the name of the action that called this page ? I don't see anything in the StandardController, there are methods to redirect to the standard edit and view pages but nothing that will return the button clicked.










share|improve this question






























    2















    I have a visualforce page that overrides both the 'New' and 'Edit' Buttons of a custom object. In my controller extension how can I get the name of the action that called this page ? I don't see anything in the StandardController, there are methods to redirect to the standard edit and view pages but nothing that will return the button clicked.










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      I have a visualforce page that overrides both the 'New' and 'Edit' Buttons of a custom object. In my controller extension how can I get the name of the action that called this page ? I don't see anything in the StandardController, there are methods to redirect to the standard edit and view pages but nothing that will return the button clicked.










      share|improve this question
















      I have a visualforce page that overrides both the 'New' and 'Edit' Buttons of a custom object. In my controller extension how can I get the name of the action that called this page ? I don't see anything in the StandardController, there are methods to redirect to the standard edit and view pages but nothing that will return the button clicked.







      apex visualforce controller-extension standardcontroller salesforce-classic






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 3 hours ago









      Jayant Das

      18.2k21330




      18.2k21330










      asked 5 hours ago









      SallyRothroatSallyRothroat

      421317




      421317




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now







          share|improve this answer

























          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            4 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            3 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "459"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257521%2fget-name-of-standard-action-overriden-in-visualforce-contorller%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now







          share|improve this answer

























          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            4 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            3 hours ago
















          3














          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now







          share|improve this answer

























          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            4 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            3 hours ago














          3












          3








          3







          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now







          share|improve this answer















          I don't know if there's any standard way to do so, but you can utilize an approach here in your Extension's constructor to identify if the click was from New or Edit.



          When you click on New button, that signifies that you are creating a new record and that it won't have an Id yet, whereas for Edit there will be always one. So checking that in the Extension will help you to identify the flow.



          public class MyExtension 

          private MyObj__c abc;
          private String buttonClicked;

          public MyExtension(ApexPages.StandardController stdController)
          this.abc = (MyObj__c) stdController.getRecord();

          buttonClicked = (abc.Id == null ? 'New' : 'Edit');
          // do something now








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago

























          answered 4 hours ago









          Jayant DasJayant Das

          18.2k21330




          18.2k21330












          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            4 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            3 hours ago


















          • +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

            – sfdcfox
            4 hours ago











          • @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

            – Jayant Das
            4 hours ago












          • I'll test it out, thanks !

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

            – SallyRothroat
            3 hours ago











          • @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

            – Jayant Das
            3 hours ago

















          +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

          – sfdcfox
          4 hours ago





          +1 Strictly speaking, the parentheses around the ternary expression is not necessary, since there's no ambiguity in the syntax.

          – sfdcfox
          4 hours ago













          @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

          – Jayant Das
          4 hours ago






          @sfdcfox I agree. I just keep it for a better readability just to not confuse between = and == in the same statement.

          – Jayant Das
          4 hours ago














          I'll test it out, thanks !

          – SallyRothroat
          3 hours ago





          I'll test it out, thanks !

          – SallyRothroat
          3 hours ago













          I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

          – SallyRothroat
          3 hours ago





          I was already getting the record so perfect I'll just check if it's null. What's the abc for?

          – SallyRothroat
          3 hours ago













          @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

          – Jayant Das
          3 hours ago






          @SallyRothroat Ah, I missed that part. It's just a variable of type of the object which is fetched in the constructor, I have updated my answer. If you are already getting your record, then you just need to verify the Id and done.

          – Jayant Das
          3 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257521%2fget-name-of-standard-action-overriden-in-visualforce-contorller%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

          Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

          Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6