how to check a propriety using r studioSquare root of Chi-square distribution tends to $N(0,1)$Relationship between chi-squared and standard normal distributions.How to check $H_0$ hypothesis using Pearson's criteria?Bivariate Normal Distribution Problem vs MarginalsShow that $Y = sum_i=1^n Y_i$ is distributed as $chi _2n^2$.If I have that $X sim chi^2_1$ and $Y sim chi^2_2$ are independent, how can I show that $4XY sim Y^2$?Chi-square test to check sampled varianceNormal distributionHypothesis testing: mean comparisonShow $1 + z_alpha/2/sqrtn approx chi^2_alpha/2 (2n)/(2n)$

Mutually beneficial digestive system symbiotes

Get value of a counter

Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?

Can a monk's single staff be considered dual wielded, as per the Dual Wielder feat?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Modeling an IP Address

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using multiattack?

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

Does detail obscure or enhance action?

What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?

A case of the sniffles

Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property Name

Arrow those variables!

Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions

how to check a propriety using r studio

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Codimension of non-flat locus

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

Do infinite dimensional systems make sense?

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?



how to check a propriety using r studio


Square root of Chi-square distribution tends to $N(0,1)$Relationship between chi-squared and standard normal distributions.How to check $H_0$ hypothesis using Pearson's criteria?Bivariate Normal Distribution Problem vs MarginalsShow that $Y = sum_i=1^n Y_i$ is distributed as $chi _2n^2$.If I have that $X sim chi^2_1$ and $Y sim chi^2_2$ are independent, how can I show that $4XY sim Y^2$?Chi-square test to check sampled varianceNormal distributionHypothesis testing: mean comparisonShow $1 + z_alpha/2/sqrtn approx chi^2_alpha/2 (2n)/(2n)$













3












$begingroup$


I have to check that this propriety



$Z sim N(0,1)$ and $Usim chi ^2(10)$ then $ Z/sqrtU/10 sim T(10)$



is true using r studio if anyone can help , much appreciate










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
    $endgroup$
    – Raskolnikov
    1 hour ago















3












$begingroup$


I have to check that this propriety



$Z sim N(0,1)$ and $Usim chi ^2(10)$ then $ Z/sqrtU/10 sim T(10)$



is true using r studio if anyone can help , much appreciate










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
    $endgroup$
    – Raskolnikov
    1 hour ago













3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


I have to check that this propriety



$Z sim N(0,1)$ and $Usim chi ^2(10)$ then $ Z/sqrtU/10 sim T(10)$



is true using r studio if anyone can help , much appreciate










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have to check that this propriety



$Z sim N(0,1)$ and $Usim chi ^2(10)$ then $ Z/sqrtU/10 sim T(10)$



is true using r studio if anyone can help , much appreciate







probability statistics hypothesis-testing






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









JoshuaKJoshuaK

325




325







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
    $endgroup$
    – Raskolnikov
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
    $endgroup$
    – Raskolnikov
    1 hour ago







2




2




$begingroup$
What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
$endgroup$
– Raskolnikov
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
$endgroup$
– Raskolnikov
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:



  • Simulate $Z$ using rnorm

  • Simulate $U$ using rchisq

  • Do the division $Y = Z / sqrtU / 10$

  • Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using rt

  • Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same

You can do similar things with the qqplot function if you know what you are doing






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
    Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
    and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = fracZU/sqrt10 sim mathsfT(10)$ by definition.



    Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsfT(10).$ This
    is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.



    set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
    z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
    y = z/sqrt(u/10)
    hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
    curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)


    enter image description here



    Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsfT(10).$



    summary(y)
    Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
    -10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
    qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
    [1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121


    The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
    [In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]



    var(y); 10/8
    [1] 1.250115
    [1] 1.25


    Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.



    ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)

    One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

    data: y[1:5000]
    D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
    alternative hypothesis: two-sided





    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176151%2fhow-to-check-a-propriety-using-r-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:



        • Simulate $Z$ using rnorm

        • Simulate $U$ using rchisq

        • Do the division $Y = Z / sqrtU / 10$

        • Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using rt

        • Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same

        You can do similar things with the qqplot function if you know what you are doing






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          3












          $begingroup$

          One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:



          • Simulate $Z$ using rnorm

          • Simulate $U$ using rchisq

          • Do the division $Y = Z / sqrtU / 10$

          • Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using rt

          • Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same

          You can do similar things with the qqplot function if you know what you are doing






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:



            • Simulate $Z$ using rnorm

            • Simulate $U$ using rchisq

            • Do the division $Y = Z / sqrtU / 10$

            • Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using rt

            • Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same

            You can do similar things with the qqplot function if you know what you are doing






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:



            • Simulate $Z$ using rnorm

            • Simulate $U$ using rchisq

            • Do the division $Y = Z / sqrtU / 10$

            • Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using rt

            • Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same

            You can do similar things with the qqplot function if you know what you are doing







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            HenryHenry

            101k482170




            101k482170





















                2












                $begingroup$

                I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
                Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
                and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = fracZU/sqrt10 sim mathsfT(10)$ by definition.



                Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsfT(10).$ This
                is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.



                set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
                z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
                y = z/sqrt(u/10)
                hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
                curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)


                enter image description here



                Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsfT(10).$



                summary(y)
                Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
                -10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
                qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
                [1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121


                The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
                [In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]



                var(y); 10/8
                [1] 1.250115
                [1] 1.25


                Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.



                ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)

                One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

                data: y[1:5000]
                D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
                alternative hypothesis: two-sided





                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
                  Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
                  and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = fracZU/sqrt10 sim mathsfT(10)$ by definition.



                  Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsfT(10).$ This
                  is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.



                  set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
                  z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
                  y = z/sqrt(u/10)
                  hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
                  curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)


                  enter image description here



                  Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsfT(10).$



                  summary(y)
                  Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
                  -10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
                  qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
                  [1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121


                  The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
                  [In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]



                  var(y); 10/8
                  [1] 1.250115
                  [1] 1.25


                  Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.



                  ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)

                  One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

                  data: y[1:5000]
                  D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
                  alternative hypothesis: two-sided





                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
                    Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
                    and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = fracZU/sqrt10 sim mathsfT(10)$ by definition.



                    Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsfT(10).$ This
                    is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.



                    set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
                    z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
                    y = z/sqrt(u/10)
                    hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
                    curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)


                    enter image description here



                    Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsfT(10).$



                    summary(y)
                    Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
                    -10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
                    qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
                    [1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121


                    The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
                    [In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]



                    var(y); 10/8
                    [1] 1.250115
                    [1] 1.25


                    Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.



                    ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)

                    One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

                    data: y[1:5000]
                    D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
                    alternative hypothesis: two-sided





                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
                    Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
                    and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = fracZU/sqrt10 sim mathsfT(10)$ by definition.



                    Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsfT(10).$ This
                    is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.



                    set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
                    z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
                    y = z/sqrt(u/10)
                    hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
                    curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)


                    enter image description here



                    Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsfT(10).$



                    summary(y)
                    Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
                    -10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
                    qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
                    [1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121


                    The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
                    [In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]



                    var(y); 10/8
                    [1] 1.250115
                    [1] 1.25


                    Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.



                    ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)

                    One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

                    data: y[1:5000]
                    D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
                    alternative hypothesis: two-sided






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 1 hour ago









                    BruceETBruceET

                    36.2k71540




                    36.2k71540





















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 3 hours ago









                            George DewhirstGeorge Dewhirst

                            6914




                            6914



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176151%2fhow-to-check-a-propriety-using-r-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

                                Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

                                Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6