Could a welfare state co-exist with mega corporations?How might an inter-planetary confederation turn into a highly centralized empire?City state with a direct democracy turns into an empire?How large could a modern state get?City-State Governed by the Strongest RuleCould a society function if the government, the corporations, the military, and the mafia were one and the same?Could this global, peaceful hyperpower of a nation exist?How could a corporation become a sovereign state in two or three hundred years?How could a modern company-state form?How would corporations come to be more powerful than governments?Creating a world run by corporations
Are there any specific minhagim to celebrate Purim as a family?
Not hide and seek
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?
categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant
When is the exact date for EOL of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS?
Would this string work as string?
In the event of Brexit being postponed beyond the EU elections, will UK voters in EU countries be eligible to participate?
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
Writing in a Christian voice
Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing
Find a point shared by maximum segments
Showing mass murder in a kid's book
Is divisi notation needed for brass or woodwind in an orchestra?
Offset in split text content
Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?
How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?
Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?
Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987
Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?
Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?
Comic-book: Kids find a dead female superhero in the woods
Could a welfare state co-exist with mega corporations?
How might an inter-planetary confederation turn into a highly centralized empire?City state with a direct democracy turns into an empire?How large could a modern state get?City-State Governed by the Strongest RuleCould a society function if the government, the corporations, the military, and the mafia were one and the same?Could this global, peaceful hyperpower of a nation exist?How could a corporation become a sovereign state in two or three hundred years?How could a modern company-state form?How would corporations come to be more powerful than governments?Creating a world run by corporations
$begingroup$
The Hegemony is a welfare state dedicated in giving all citizens: housing, education, basic necessities (water, food, etc), and help with either finding employment or a job assigned by the Hegemony.
The Hegemony is built on the principles: prosperity, security, and conformity (as in equality/everyone has a place in the Hegemony since the Hegemony provides one common culture).
However large corporations still exist within the Hegemony. Some of these corporations like Prometheus step into Mega-corporation territory owning their own regions (company towns, reservations) as well as their own police forces (private security due to the scale of these corporations).
Could a welfare state (a unitary global government) coexist with megacorporations without many ramifications? What sort of economic or political compromises would have to be made?
Note:
Hegemony is still a free market. While any one can apply for state housing anyone can also buy their own housing. This applies to any of the state benefits. Any one can buy private instead of state goods if they want.
Hegemony would be considered "Big Government" since it is a unitary state with smaller regions having limited autonomy and legal authority.
The laws on monopolies have been relaxed with only "harmful" (as in causing stagnation) monopolies broken up.
government corporations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Hegemony is a welfare state dedicated in giving all citizens: housing, education, basic necessities (water, food, etc), and help with either finding employment or a job assigned by the Hegemony.
The Hegemony is built on the principles: prosperity, security, and conformity (as in equality/everyone has a place in the Hegemony since the Hegemony provides one common culture).
However large corporations still exist within the Hegemony. Some of these corporations like Prometheus step into Mega-corporation territory owning their own regions (company towns, reservations) as well as their own police forces (private security due to the scale of these corporations).
Could a welfare state (a unitary global government) coexist with megacorporations without many ramifications? What sort of economic or political compromises would have to be made?
Note:
Hegemony is still a free market. While any one can apply for state housing anyone can also buy their own housing. This applies to any of the state benefits. Any one can buy private instead of state goods if they want.
Hegemony would be considered "Big Government" since it is a unitary state with smaller regions having limited autonomy and legal authority.
The laws on monopolies have been relaxed with only "harmful" (as in causing stagnation) monopolies broken up.
government corporations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@AlexP! @AlexP! Please write an answer and teach us what fascism is! I am not satisfied with my own understanding or with Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Hegemony is a welfare state dedicated in giving all citizens: housing, education, basic necessities (water, food, etc), and help with either finding employment or a job assigned by the Hegemony.
The Hegemony is built on the principles: prosperity, security, and conformity (as in equality/everyone has a place in the Hegemony since the Hegemony provides one common culture).
However large corporations still exist within the Hegemony. Some of these corporations like Prometheus step into Mega-corporation territory owning their own regions (company towns, reservations) as well as their own police forces (private security due to the scale of these corporations).
Could a welfare state (a unitary global government) coexist with megacorporations without many ramifications? What sort of economic or political compromises would have to be made?
Note:
Hegemony is still a free market. While any one can apply for state housing anyone can also buy their own housing. This applies to any of the state benefits. Any one can buy private instead of state goods if they want.
Hegemony would be considered "Big Government" since it is a unitary state with smaller regions having limited autonomy and legal authority.
The laws on monopolies have been relaxed with only "harmful" (as in causing stagnation) monopolies broken up.
government corporations
$endgroup$
The Hegemony is a welfare state dedicated in giving all citizens: housing, education, basic necessities (water, food, etc), and help with either finding employment or a job assigned by the Hegemony.
The Hegemony is built on the principles: prosperity, security, and conformity (as in equality/everyone has a place in the Hegemony since the Hegemony provides one common culture).
However large corporations still exist within the Hegemony. Some of these corporations like Prometheus step into Mega-corporation territory owning their own regions (company towns, reservations) as well as their own police forces (private security due to the scale of these corporations).
Could a welfare state (a unitary global government) coexist with megacorporations without many ramifications? What sort of economic or political compromises would have to be made?
Note:
Hegemony is still a free market. While any one can apply for state housing anyone can also buy their own housing. This applies to any of the state benefits. Any one can buy private instead of state goods if they want.
Hegemony would be considered "Big Government" since it is a unitary state with smaller regions having limited autonomy and legal authority.
The laws on monopolies have been relaxed with only "harmful" (as in causing stagnation) monopolies broken up.
government corporations
government corporations
asked 4 hours ago
Celestial Dragon EmperorCelestial Dragon Emperor
2,37331434
2,37331434
$begingroup$
@AlexP! @AlexP! Please write an answer and teach us what fascism is! I am not satisfied with my own understanding or with Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@AlexP! @AlexP! Please write an answer and teach us what fascism is! I am not satisfied with my own understanding or with Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP! @AlexP! Please write an answer and teach us what fascism is! I am not satisfied with my own understanding or with Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP! @AlexP! Please write an answer and teach us what fascism is! I am not satisfied with my own understanding or with Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's simple: the megacorporations coexist with the government because they're under contract.
Let's say for the sake of argument that the Hegemony was not always a welfare state. Once, it didn't provide such things for its citizens, and then at some point it decided to do so. This is a massive undertaking for any state: it has to study its own people, organize aid disbursements on an unprecedented scale, and add new bureaucracy to manage these functions. Making matters worse, many of the things it's providing are not things it's used to providing. Does the government have the facilities to physically receive and ship massive quantities of food from the farms to its citizens? Does it have nationalized power plants and the highly-trained staff needed to run them? Does it have retailers? Marketing staff to determine which luxuries the people want? Analysts to decide what fields it should focus education on? Very likely it doesn't.
Who does have that infrastructure and those people? Corporations do; that's what they're for. Rather than creating its own government dispensaries for, say, medicine, the government goes to the existing pharmacies and drug companies and insists that they will provide certain products and services to designated standards, in return for subsidies. This way, the Hegemony isn't duplicating existing infrastructure, and its role is limited to regulation, oversight, and contracting - all things governments have more experience with.
Over time, the government and corporations would grow more symbiotically entwined with one another. The corporations can't simply walk away from the government, because they would operate at a loss without those subsidies - not to mention the loss of markets. On the other hand, the government can't shut down too many corporations or it loses the ability to provide for its citizens. This protection applies best to larger corporations and cartels, though; if a small corporation misbehaves, the government can smack them down and rely on their rivals to pick up the slack. So there's a strong incentive for corporations to merge into ever larger, more diverse conglomerates in order to negotiate with the government on a more equal footing.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While the Hegemony always has been a welfare state some of these corporations come from a time before the Hegemony. Maybe the Hegemony left most of the contracts and deals of the major corporations unchanged or only slightly modified to prevent economic upheaval. I like the contracting the logistics to the companies I'll definitely use that.
$endgroup$
– Celestial Dragon Emperor
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely
In fact, it would be in the best interest of the mega-corp to have at least one welfare state hanging around. Somebody pays. Somebody always pays. In the case of a welfare-state, it's the government that pays by taxing everything else under the sun. And it's easier to convince one government than it is millions of people (especially when you have a group of people politically biased toward taxing everything to ensure everybody has everything in equality).
Could a mega-corp exist only within the context of a welfare-state? Probably not. But do they want one or more from many states? Absolutely.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mega corps are really only interested in on thing profits. A lot of the time they are not even interested in the well being of their employees, outside of keeping them just happy enough for them not to leave. They are definitely not interested in the general welfare of the populace as a whole. Having a government around would benefit the mega crops in various ways. The government provides an atmosphere to do business in buy ensuring law an order, an educated populace from which to recruit workers, a national defense, a source on income in the form of government contracts, a social safety net(health care, basic income), infrastructure(roads, bridges, electricity, water, telecommunications), and protection against foreign mega corps in form of protectionist trade policies. All this helps mega corps maximize their profits. In turn the mega corps provide tax revenue, jobs, products, services, and an economy in general.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. But details depend on who's in charge.
Hegemony is in charge. All corporations, mega or not, need to play by its rules. They are allowed a freedom to make profits, but have to pay taxes and should never go political. Hegemony, on the other hand, keeps ordinary people content and takes care of those who didn't find a place to work at mega-corporations. When corporation tries to skirt the rules, Hegemony would make an example of it.
Corporations are in charge. Hegemony is heavily influenced by the big money, no decision is made without considering corporate interests. Mega corporations like to make profits, but they realize the danger of large discontent underclass. As a solution, Hegemony acts as a law enforcement and welfare agency jointly run by the corporations.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Option 2 feels weirdly familiar....
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141850%2fcould-a-welfare-state-co-exist-with-mega-corporations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's simple: the megacorporations coexist with the government because they're under contract.
Let's say for the sake of argument that the Hegemony was not always a welfare state. Once, it didn't provide such things for its citizens, and then at some point it decided to do so. This is a massive undertaking for any state: it has to study its own people, organize aid disbursements on an unprecedented scale, and add new bureaucracy to manage these functions. Making matters worse, many of the things it's providing are not things it's used to providing. Does the government have the facilities to physically receive and ship massive quantities of food from the farms to its citizens? Does it have nationalized power plants and the highly-trained staff needed to run them? Does it have retailers? Marketing staff to determine which luxuries the people want? Analysts to decide what fields it should focus education on? Very likely it doesn't.
Who does have that infrastructure and those people? Corporations do; that's what they're for. Rather than creating its own government dispensaries for, say, medicine, the government goes to the existing pharmacies and drug companies and insists that they will provide certain products and services to designated standards, in return for subsidies. This way, the Hegemony isn't duplicating existing infrastructure, and its role is limited to regulation, oversight, and contracting - all things governments have more experience with.
Over time, the government and corporations would grow more symbiotically entwined with one another. The corporations can't simply walk away from the government, because they would operate at a loss without those subsidies - not to mention the loss of markets. On the other hand, the government can't shut down too many corporations or it loses the ability to provide for its citizens. This protection applies best to larger corporations and cartels, though; if a small corporation misbehaves, the government can smack them down and rely on their rivals to pick up the slack. So there's a strong incentive for corporations to merge into ever larger, more diverse conglomerates in order to negotiate with the government on a more equal footing.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While the Hegemony always has been a welfare state some of these corporations come from a time before the Hegemony. Maybe the Hegemony left most of the contracts and deals of the major corporations unchanged or only slightly modified to prevent economic upheaval. I like the contracting the logistics to the companies I'll definitely use that.
$endgroup$
– Celestial Dragon Emperor
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's simple: the megacorporations coexist with the government because they're under contract.
Let's say for the sake of argument that the Hegemony was not always a welfare state. Once, it didn't provide such things for its citizens, and then at some point it decided to do so. This is a massive undertaking for any state: it has to study its own people, organize aid disbursements on an unprecedented scale, and add new bureaucracy to manage these functions. Making matters worse, many of the things it's providing are not things it's used to providing. Does the government have the facilities to physically receive and ship massive quantities of food from the farms to its citizens? Does it have nationalized power plants and the highly-trained staff needed to run them? Does it have retailers? Marketing staff to determine which luxuries the people want? Analysts to decide what fields it should focus education on? Very likely it doesn't.
Who does have that infrastructure and those people? Corporations do; that's what they're for. Rather than creating its own government dispensaries for, say, medicine, the government goes to the existing pharmacies and drug companies and insists that they will provide certain products and services to designated standards, in return for subsidies. This way, the Hegemony isn't duplicating existing infrastructure, and its role is limited to regulation, oversight, and contracting - all things governments have more experience with.
Over time, the government and corporations would grow more symbiotically entwined with one another. The corporations can't simply walk away from the government, because they would operate at a loss without those subsidies - not to mention the loss of markets. On the other hand, the government can't shut down too many corporations or it loses the ability to provide for its citizens. This protection applies best to larger corporations and cartels, though; if a small corporation misbehaves, the government can smack them down and rely on their rivals to pick up the slack. So there's a strong incentive for corporations to merge into ever larger, more diverse conglomerates in order to negotiate with the government on a more equal footing.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While the Hegemony always has been a welfare state some of these corporations come from a time before the Hegemony. Maybe the Hegemony left most of the contracts and deals of the major corporations unchanged or only slightly modified to prevent economic upheaval. I like the contracting the logistics to the companies I'll definitely use that.
$endgroup$
– Celestial Dragon Emperor
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's simple: the megacorporations coexist with the government because they're under contract.
Let's say for the sake of argument that the Hegemony was not always a welfare state. Once, it didn't provide such things for its citizens, and then at some point it decided to do so. This is a massive undertaking for any state: it has to study its own people, organize aid disbursements on an unprecedented scale, and add new bureaucracy to manage these functions. Making matters worse, many of the things it's providing are not things it's used to providing. Does the government have the facilities to physically receive and ship massive quantities of food from the farms to its citizens? Does it have nationalized power plants and the highly-trained staff needed to run them? Does it have retailers? Marketing staff to determine which luxuries the people want? Analysts to decide what fields it should focus education on? Very likely it doesn't.
Who does have that infrastructure and those people? Corporations do; that's what they're for. Rather than creating its own government dispensaries for, say, medicine, the government goes to the existing pharmacies and drug companies and insists that they will provide certain products and services to designated standards, in return for subsidies. This way, the Hegemony isn't duplicating existing infrastructure, and its role is limited to regulation, oversight, and contracting - all things governments have more experience with.
Over time, the government and corporations would grow more symbiotically entwined with one another. The corporations can't simply walk away from the government, because they would operate at a loss without those subsidies - not to mention the loss of markets. On the other hand, the government can't shut down too many corporations or it loses the ability to provide for its citizens. This protection applies best to larger corporations and cartels, though; if a small corporation misbehaves, the government can smack them down and rely on their rivals to pick up the slack. So there's a strong incentive for corporations to merge into ever larger, more diverse conglomerates in order to negotiate with the government on a more equal footing.
$endgroup$
It's simple: the megacorporations coexist with the government because they're under contract.
Let's say for the sake of argument that the Hegemony was not always a welfare state. Once, it didn't provide such things for its citizens, and then at some point it decided to do so. This is a massive undertaking for any state: it has to study its own people, organize aid disbursements on an unprecedented scale, and add new bureaucracy to manage these functions. Making matters worse, many of the things it's providing are not things it's used to providing. Does the government have the facilities to physically receive and ship massive quantities of food from the farms to its citizens? Does it have nationalized power plants and the highly-trained staff needed to run them? Does it have retailers? Marketing staff to determine which luxuries the people want? Analysts to decide what fields it should focus education on? Very likely it doesn't.
Who does have that infrastructure and those people? Corporations do; that's what they're for. Rather than creating its own government dispensaries for, say, medicine, the government goes to the existing pharmacies and drug companies and insists that they will provide certain products and services to designated standards, in return for subsidies. This way, the Hegemony isn't duplicating existing infrastructure, and its role is limited to regulation, oversight, and contracting - all things governments have more experience with.
Over time, the government and corporations would grow more symbiotically entwined with one another. The corporations can't simply walk away from the government, because they would operate at a loss without those subsidies - not to mention the loss of markets. On the other hand, the government can't shut down too many corporations or it loses the ability to provide for its citizens. This protection applies best to larger corporations and cartels, though; if a small corporation misbehaves, the government can smack them down and rely on their rivals to pick up the slack. So there's a strong incentive for corporations to merge into ever larger, more diverse conglomerates in order to negotiate with the government on a more equal footing.
answered 3 hours ago
CadenceCadence
14.9k52954
14.9k52954
$begingroup$
While the Hegemony always has been a welfare state some of these corporations come from a time before the Hegemony. Maybe the Hegemony left most of the contracts and deals of the major corporations unchanged or only slightly modified to prevent economic upheaval. I like the contracting the logistics to the companies I'll definitely use that.
$endgroup$
– Celestial Dragon Emperor
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the Hegemony always has been a welfare state some of these corporations come from a time before the Hegemony. Maybe the Hegemony left most of the contracts and deals of the major corporations unchanged or only slightly modified to prevent economic upheaval. I like the contracting the logistics to the companies I'll definitely use that.
$endgroup$
– Celestial Dragon Emperor
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
While the Hegemony always has been a welfare state some of these corporations come from a time before the Hegemony. Maybe the Hegemony left most of the contracts and deals of the major corporations unchanged or only slightly modified to prevent economic upheaval. I like the contracting the logistics to the companies I'll definitely use that.
$endgroup$
– Celestial Dragon Emperor
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
While the Hegemony always has been a welfare state some of these corporations come from a time before the Hegemony. Maybe the Hegemony left most of the contracts and deals of the major corporations unchanged or only slightly modified to prevent economic upheaval. I like the contracting the logistics to the companies I'll definitely use that.
$endgroup$
– Celestial Dragon Emperor
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely
In fact, it would be in the best interest of the mega-corp to have at least one welfare state hanging around. Somebody pays. Somebody always pays. In the case of a welfare-state, it's the government that pays by taxing everything else under the sun. And it's easier to convince one government than it is millions of people (especially when you have a group of people politically biased toward taxing everything to ensure everybody has everything in equality).
Could a mega-corp exist only within the context of a welfare-state? Probably not. But do they want one or more from many states? Absolutely.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely
In fact, it would be in the best interest of the mega-corp to have at least one welfare state hanging around. Somebody pays. Somebody always pays. In the case of a welfare-state, it's the government that pays by taxing everything else under the sun. And it's easier to convince one government than it is millions of people (especially when you have a group of people politically biased toward taxing everything to ensure everybody has everything in equality).
Could a mega-corp exist only within the context of a welfare-state? Probably not. But do they want one or more from many states? Absolutely.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely
In fact, it would be in the best interest of the mega-corp to have at least one welfare state hanging around. Somebody pays. Somebody always pays. In the case of a welfare-state, it's the government that pays by taxing everything else under the sun. And it's easier to convince one government than it is millions of people (especially when you have a group of people politically biased toward taxing everything to ensure everybody has everything in equality).
Could a mega-corp exist only within the context of a welfare-state? Probably not. But do they want one or more from many states? Absolutely.
$endgroup$
Absolutely
In fact, it would be in the best interest of the mega-corp to have at least one welfare state hanging around. Somebody pays. Somebody always pays. In the case of a welfare-state, it's the government that pays by taxing everything else under the sun. And it's easier to convince one government than it is millions of people (especially when you have a group of people politically biased toward taxing everything to ensure everybody has everything in equality).
Could a mega-corp exist only within the context of a welfare-state? Probably not. But do they want one or more from many states? Absolutely.
answered 3 hours ago
JBHJBH
46.4k698221
46.4k698221
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mega corps are really only interested in on thing profits. A lot of the time they are not even interested in the well being of their employees, outside of keeping them just happy enough for them not to leave. They are definitely not interested in the general welfare of the populace as a whole. Having a government around would benefit the mega crops in various ways. The government provides an atmosphere to do business in buy ensuring law an order, an educated populace from which to recruit workers, a national defense, a source on income in the form of government contracts, a social safety net(health care, basic income), infrastructure(roads, bridges, electricity, water, telecommunications), and protection against foreign mega corps in form of protectionist trade policies. All this helps mega corps maximize their profits. In turn the mega corps provide tax revenue, jobs, products, services, and an economy in general.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mega corps are really only interested in on thing profits. A lot of the time they are not even interested in the well being of their employees, outside of keeping them just happy enough for them not to leave. They are definitely not interested in the general welfare of the populace as a whole. Having a government around would benefit the mega crops in various ways. The government provides an atmosphere to do business in buy ensuring law an order, an educated populace from which to recruit workers, a national defense, a source on income in the form of government contracts, a social safety net(health care, basic income), infrastructure(roads, bridges, electricity, water, telecommunications), and protection against foreign mega corps in form of protectionist trade policies. All this helps mega corps maximize their profits. In turn the mega corps provide tax revenue, jobs, products, services, and an economy in general.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mega corps are really only interested in on thing profits. A lot of the time they are not even interested in the well being of their employees, outside of keeping them just happy enough for them not to leave. They are definitely not interested in the general welfare of the populace as a whole. Having a government around would benefit the mega crops in various ways. The government provides an atmosphere to do business in buy ensuring law an order, an educated populace from which to recruit workers, a national defense, a source on income in the form of government contracts, a social safety net(health care, basic income), infrastructure(roads, bridges, electricity, water, telecommunications), and protection against foreign mega corps in form of protectionist trade policies. All this helps mega corps maximize their profits. In turn the mega corps provide tax revenue, jobs, products, services, and an economy in general.
$endgroup$
Mega corps are really only interested in on thing profits. A lot of the time they are not even interested in the well being of their employees, outside of keeping them just happy enough for them not to leave. They are definitely not interested in the general welfare of the populace as a whole. Having a government around would benefit the mega crops in various ways. The government provides an atmosphere to do business in buy ensuring law an order, an educated populace from which to recruit workers, a national defense, a source on income in the form of government contracts, a social safety net(health care, basic income), infrastructure(roads, bridges, electricity, water, telecommunications), and protection against foreign mega corps in form of protectionist trade policies. All this helps mega corps maximize their profits. In turn the mega corps provide tax revenue, jobs, products, services, and an economy in general.
answered 2 hours ago
SciFiGuySciFiGuy
1,41811
1,41811
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. But details depend on who's in charge.
Hegemony is in charge. All corporations, mega or not, need to play by its rules. They are allowed a freedom to make profits, but have to pay taxes and should never go political. Hegemony, on the other hand, keeps ordinary people content and takes care of those who didn't find a place to work at mega-corporations. When corporation tries to skirt the rules, Hegemony would make an example of it.
Corporations are in charge. Hegemony is heavily influenced by the big money, no decision is made without considering corporate interests. Mega corporations like to make profits, but they realize the danger of large discontent underclass. As a solution, Hegemony acts as a law enforcement and welfare agency jointly run by the corporations.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Option 2 feels weirdly familiar....
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. But details depend on who's in charge.
Hegemony is in charge. All corporations, mega or not, need to play by its rules. They are allowed a freedom to make profits, but have to pay taxes and should never go political. Hegemony, on the other hand, keeps ordinary people content and takes care of those who didn't find a place to work at mega-corporations. When corporation tries to skirt the rules, Hegemony would make an example of it.
Corporations are in charge. Hegemony is heavily influenced by the big money, no decision is made without considering corporate interests. Mega corporations like to make profits, but they realize the danger of large discontent underclass. As a solution, Hegemony acts as a law enforcement and welfare agency jointly run by the corporations.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Option 2 feels weirdly familiar....
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. But details depend on who's in charge.
Hegemony is in charge. All corporations, mega or not, need to play by its rules. They are allowed a freedom to make profits, but have to pay taxes and should never go political. Hegemony, on the other hand, keeps ordinary people content and takes care of those who didn't find a place to work at mega-corporations. When corporation tries to skirt the rules, Hegemony would make an example of it.
Corporations are in charge. Hegemony is heavily influenced by the big money, no decision is made without considering corporate interests. Mega corporations like to make profits, but they realize the danger of large discontent underclass. As a solution, Hegemony acts as a law enforcement and welfare agency jointly run by the corporations.
$endgroup$
Yes. But details depend on who's in charge.
Hegemony is in charge. All corporations, mega or not, need to play by its rules. They are allowed a freedom to make profits, but have to pay taxes and should never go political. Hegemony, on the other hand, keeps ordinary people content and takes care of those who didn't find a place to work at mega-corporations. When corporation tries to skirt the rules, Hegemony would make an example of it.
Corporations are in charge. Hegemony is heavily influenced by the big money, no decision is made without considering corporate interests. Mega corporations like to make profits, but they realize the danger of large discontent underclass. As a solution, Hegemony acts as a law enforcement and welfare agency jointly run by the corporations.
answered 3 hours ago
AlexanderAlexander
21.4k53384
21.4k53384
$begingroup$
Option 2 feels weirdly familiar....
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Option 2 feels weirdly familiar....
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Option 2 feels weirdly familiar....
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Option 2 feels weirdly familiar....
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141850%2fcould-a-welfare-state-co-exist-with-mega-corporations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@AlexP! @AlexP! Please write an answer and teach us what fascism is! I am not satisfied with my own understanding or with Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Willk
4 hours ago