Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy

Is divisi notation needed for brass or woodwind in an orchestra?

Put the phone down / Put down the phone

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

Connection Between Knot Theory and Number Theory

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

What is the period/term used describe Giuseppe Arcimboldo's style of painting?

What properties make a magic weapon befit a Rogue more than a DEX-based Fighter?

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bosendorfer?

Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do

If the Dominion rule using their Jem'Hadar troops, why is their life expectancy so low?

Reason why a kingside attack is not justified

Would this string work as string?

Should I warn a new PhD Student?

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?

Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?

Magnifying glass in hyperbolic space

Not hide and seek

How to preserve electronics (computers, ipads, phones) for hundreds of years?

Can Gdal.Translate() return an object instead of writing a file?

What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?



Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?


(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy













6












$begingroup$


I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$


    I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



    Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



    For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



    Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



    So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



      Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



      For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



      Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



      So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



      Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



      For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



      Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



      So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.







      search-algorithms hash-tables permutations






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 6 hours ago









      SmileyCraftSmileyCraft

      1311




      1311




      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "419"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago















          2












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago













          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm. This can be seen in the case when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is not. Then knowing the index $I(k)$ of the same element in $b$ for the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in linear time by putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          Apass.JackApass.Jack

          13k1939




          13k1939











          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago
















          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            1 hour ago















          $begingroup$
          I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
          $endgroup$
          – smac89
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
          $endgroup$
          – smac89
          2 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          2 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          1 hour ago




          $begingroup$
          This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          1 hour ago










          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

          Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

          Typsetting diagram chases (with TikZ?) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Draw edge on arcNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to place nodes in an absolute coordinate system in tikzCommutative diagram with curve connecting between nodesTikz with standalone: pinning tikz coordinates to page cmDrawing a Decision Diagram with Tikz and layout manager