Why use ultrasound for medical imaging? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is there an upper frequency limit to ultrasound?How is it possible for an Ultrasound device to correctly interpret a negative density change in tissue?How specifically does an MRI machine build an image from received radio wavesIs it possible to send modulated ultrasound wave from underwater to air?Why the Doppler Ultrasound beam needs to be looking directly down at a pipeIntensity of an ultrasound beam?Dynamic range of ultrasound machine expressed in dBUltrasound wave/beam generationDoppler effect of sound waves in bloodAveraging speed of ultrasound between two differnt boundaires

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

Do warforged have souls?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

How many people can fit inside Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

Change bounding box of math glyphs in LuaTeX

How to delete random line from file using Unix command?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

Make it rain characters

First use of “packing” as in carrying a gun

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

A pet rabbit called Belle

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Python - Fishing Simulator

Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Match Roman Numerals



Why use ultrasound for medical imaging?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is there an upper frequency limit to ultrasound?How is it possible for an Ultrasound device to correctly interpret a negative density change in tissue?How specifically does an MRI machine build an image from received radio wavesIs it possible to send modulated ultrasound wave from underwater to air?Why the Doppler Ultrasound beam needs to be looking directly down at a pipeIntensity of an ultrasound beam?Dynamic range of ultrasound machine expressed in dBUltrasound wave/beam generationDoppler effect of sound waves in bloodAveraging speed of ultrasound between two differnt boundaires










0












$begingroup$


What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    39 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Homework-like question, lack of effort.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    4 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    3 mins ago















0












$begingroup$


What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    39 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Homework-like question, lack of effort.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    4 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    3 mins ago













0












0








0





$begingroup$


What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?







energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Qmechanic

108k122001245




108k122001245






New contributor




Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan

19311




19311




New contributor




Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    39 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Homework-like question, lack of effort.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    4 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    3 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    39 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Homework-like question, lack of effort.
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    4 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    3 mins ago















$begingroup$
your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
39 mins ago




$begingroup$
your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
39 mins ago












$begingroup$
Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
$endgroup$
– dmckee
36 mins ago




$begingroup$
Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
$endgroup$
– dmckee
36 mins ago












$begingroup$
Homework-like question, lack of effort.
$endgroup$
– Pieter
4 mins ago




$begingroup$
Homework-like question, lack of effort.
$endgroup$
– Pieter
4 mins ago












$begingroup$
you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
3 mins ago




$begingroup$
you have a point, I’ll try to stop posting trivial questions from now on
$endgroup$
– Ubaid Hassan
3 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

I think the simple answer here is resolution.



Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.



If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by



$$lambda = c over f $$



so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....



The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate



$$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$



At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    37 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    33 mins ago


















1












$begingroup$

Higher frequency provides higher resolution.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 points.



    The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the points or the waves are reflected on the points. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 point, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.



    On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
    $$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
    where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of point.



    Two points are called resolvable if their picture on the detector are distinguishable, for example, if their Airy-disk are non-overlapping. That means, it will limit how close the distinguishable points can be. With a given pixel and size properties of the detector you can only modify $lambda$, and as it can be seen, lowering $lambda$ makes it possible to resolve even closer objects.



    And as it is known,
    $$lambda = c/f,$$
    where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
      $endgroup$
      – dmckee
      17 mins ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472565%2fwhy-use-ultrasound-for-medical-imaging%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    I think the simple answer here is resolution.



    Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.



    If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by



    $$lambda = c over f $$



    so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....



    The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate



    $$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$



    At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
      $endgroup$
      – Ubaid Hassan
      37 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
      $endgroup$
      – dmckee
      33 mins ago















    5












    $begingroup$

    I think the simple answer here is resolution.



    Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.



    If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by



    $$lambda = c over f $$



    so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....



    The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate



    $$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$



    At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
      $endgroup$
      – Ubaid Hassan
      37 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
      $endgroup$
      – dmckee
      33 mins ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    I think the simple answer here is resolution.



    Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.



    If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by



    $$lambda = c over f $$



    so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....



    The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate



    $$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$



    At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I think the simple answer here is resolution.



    Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.



    If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by



    $$lambda = c over f $$



    so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....



    The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate



    $$lambda = 0.001 rm m = 1 rm mm$$



    At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    tomtom

    6,39711627




    6,39711627











    • $begingroup$
      Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
      $endgroup$
      – Ubaid Hassan
      37 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
      $endgroup$
      – dmckee
      33 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
      $endgroup$
      – Ubaid Hassan
      37 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
      $endgroup$
      – dmckee
      33 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    37 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
    $endgroup$
    – Ubaid Hassan
    37 mins ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    33 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    33 mins ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    Higher frequency provides higher resolution.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Higher frequency provides higher resolution.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Higher frequency provides higher resolution.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Higher frequency provides higher resolution.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        akhmeteliakhmeteli

        18.5k21844




        18.5k21844





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 points.



            The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the points or the waves are reflected on the points. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 point, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.



            On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
            $$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
            where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of point.



            Two points are called resolvable if their picture on the detector are distinguishable, for example, if their Airy-disk are non-overlapping. That means, it will limit how close the distinguishable points can be. With a given pixel and size properties of the detector you can only modify $lambda$, and as it can be seen, lowering $lambda$ makes it possible to resolve even closer objects.



            And as it is known,
            $$lambda = c/f,$$
            where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
              $endgroup$
              – dmckee
              17 mins ago















            1












            $begingroup$

            Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 points.



            The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the points or the waves are reflected on the points. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 point, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.



            On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
            $$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
            where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of point.



            Two points are called resolvable if their picture on the detector are distinguishable, for example, if their Airy-disk are non-overlapping. That means, it will limit how close the distinguishable points can be. With a given pixel and size properties of the detector you can only modify $lambda$, and as it can be seen, lowering $lambda$ makes it possible to resolve even closer objects.



            And as it is known,
            $$lambda = c/f,$$
            where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
              $endgroup$
              – dmckee
              17 mins ago













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 points.



            The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the points or the waves are reflected on the points. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 point, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.



            On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
            $$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
            where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of point.



            Two points are called resolvable if their picture on the detector are distinguishable, for example, if their Airy-disk are non-overlapping. That means, it will limit how close the distinguishable points can be. With a given pixel and size properties of the detector you can only modify $lambda$, and as it can be seen, lowering $lambda$ makes it possible to resolve even closer objects.



            And as it is known,
            $$lambda = c/f,$$
            where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Using waves for imaging, you want to distinguish points in the specimen. Consider the simplest case: you'd like to distinguish 2 points.



            The waves are coming from behind the specimen passing through the points or the waves are reflected on the points. Considering the phase relationship of the waves at the detector (i.e. investigating interference) because of the diffraction on the 1 point, even with focusing, one cannot get a single point on the detector. Take a look on the single slit diffraction and on the 2D version, on the Airy disk.



            On the focused image you will get concentric circles. For $alpha$, the angular distance between the two most visible, inner ones one gets
            $$lambda /left( 2d right) = sin left( alpha right) approx alpha ,$$
            where $lambda$ corresponds to the wavelength and $d$ is the size of point.



            Two points are called resolvable if their picture on the detector are distinguishable, for example, if their Airy-disk are non-overlapping. That means, it will limit how close the distinguishable points can be. With a given pixel and size properties of the detector you can only modify $lambda$, and as it can be seen, lowering $lambda$ makes it possible to resolve even closer objects.



            And as it is known,
            $$lambda = c/f,$$
            where $c$ is the speed of the wave and $f$ is frequency, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength is, increasing the achievable resolution.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 15 mins ago

























            answered 18 mins ago









            DanielTuzesDanielTuzes

            1985




            1985











            • $begingroup$
              Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
              $endgroup$
              – dmckee
              17 mins ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
              $endgroup$
              – dmckee
              17 mins ago















            $begingroup$
            Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
            $endgroup$
            – dmckee
            17 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Maybe "enter link description here" is not the link description you want.
            $endgroup$
            – dmckee
            17 mins ago










            Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472565%2fwhy-use-ultrasound-for-medical-imaging%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

            Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

            Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6