Proving that any solution to the differential equation of an oscillator can be written as a sum of sinusoids. Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How can the general Green's function of a linear homogeneous differential equation be derived?Proving a system of n linear equations has only one solutionThe pair $x_1$ , $x_2$ are Linearly IndependentName/Solution of this Differential EquationEvery solution of some linear differential equation of order 2 is boundedSolution of Matrix differential equation $textbfX'(t)=textbfAtextbfX(t)$How to relate the solutions to a Fuchsian type differential equation to the solutions to the hypergeometric differential equation?Difference between real and complex solution in differential equationFinding the general solution to a system of differential equations using eigenvaluesTwo systems of linear equations equivalent

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

How do you write "wild blueberries flavored"?

3D Masyu - A Die

Any stored/leased 737s that could substitute for grounded MAXs?

Russian equivalents of おしゃれは足元から (Every good outfit starts with the shoes)

Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?

What did Turing mean when saying that "machines cannot give rise to surprises" is due to a fallacy?

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

Shimano 105 brifters (5800) and Avid BB5 compatibility

Is a copyright notice with a non-existent name be invalid?

malloc in main() or malloc in another function: allocating memory for a struct and its members

Keep at all times, the minus sign above aligned with minus sign below

Why complex landing gears are used instead of simple, reliable and light weight muscle wire or shape memory alloys?

What is a more techy Technical Writer job title that isn't cutesy or confusing?

Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?

How to resize main filesystem

New Order #6: Easter Egg

What is the proper term for etching or digging of wall to hide conduit of cables

By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?

How to infer difference of population proportion between two groups when proportion is small?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

How do you cope with tons of web fonts when copying and pasting from web pages?

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?



Proving that any solution to the differential equation of an oscillator can be written as a sum of sinusoids.



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How can the general Green's function of a linear homogeneous differential equation be derived?Proving a system of n linear equations has only one solutionThe pair $x_1$ , $x_2$ are Linearly IndependentName/Solution of this Differential EquationEvery solution of some linear differential equation of order 2 is boundedSolution of Matrix differential equation $textbfX'(t)=textbfAtextbfX(t)$How to relate the solutions to a Fuchsian type differential equation to the solutions to the hypergeometric differential equation?Difference between real and complex solution in differential equationFinding the general solution to a system of differential equations using eigenvaluesTwo systems of linear equations equivalent










2












$begingroup$


Suppose you have a differential equation with n distinct functions of $t$ where



$fracd^2x_1dt^2=k_11x_1+...k_1nx_n$



.



.



.



$fracd^2x_ndt^2=k_n1x_1+...k_nnx_n$



I want to show that any set of solutions of this differential equation $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) $



can be written as a linear combination of solutions of the form $(e^iw_1t,...,e^iw_1t), (e^iw_2t,...e^iw_2t), ...,(e^iw_mt,...e^iw_mt)$ where each $w_j$ is a real number.



i.e. I want to know why the motion of any oscillator can be written as a linear combination of its normal modes. I would also appreciate it if you could tell me if a proof of this fact has to do with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in general.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose you have a differential equation with n distinct functions of $t$ where



    $fracd^2x_1dt^2=k_11x_1+...k_1nx_n$



    .



    .



    .



    $fracd^2x_ndt^2=k_n1x_1+...k_nnx_n$



    I want to show that any set of solutions of this differential equation $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) $



    can be written as a linear combination of solutions of the form $(e^iw_1t,...,e^iw_1t), (e^iw_2t,...e^iw_2t), ...,(e^iw_mt,...e^iw_mt)$ where each $w_j$ is a real number.



    i.e. I want to know why the motion of any oscillator can be written as a linear combination of its normal modes. I would also appreciate it if you could tell me if a proof of this fact has to do with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in general.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Suppose you have a differential equation with n distinct functions of $t$ where



      $fracd^2x_1dt^2=k_11x_1+...k_1nx_n$



      .



      .



      .



      $fracd^2x_ndt^2=k_n1x_1+...k_nnx_n$



      I want to show that any set of solutions of this differential equation $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) $



      can be written as a linear combination of solutions of the form $(e^iw_1t,...,e^iw_1t), (e^iw_2t,...e^iw_2t), ...,(e^iw_mt,...e^iw_mt)$ where each $w_j$ is a real number.



      i.e. I want to know why the motion of any oscillator can be written as a linear combination of its normal modes. I would also appreciate it if you could tell me if a proof of this fact has to do with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in general.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose you have a differential equation with n distinct functions of $t$ where



      $fracd^2x_1dt^2=k_11x_1+...k_1nx_n$



      .



      .



      .



      $fracd^2x_ndt^2=k_n1x_1+...k_nnx_n$



      I want to show that any set of solutions of this differential equation $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) $



      can be written as a linear combination of solutions of the form $(e^iw_1t,...,e^iw_1t), (e^iw_2t,...e^iw_2t), ...,(e^iw_mt,...e^iw_mt)$ where each $w_j$ is a real number.



      i.e. I want to know why the motion of any oscillator can be written as a linear combination of its normal modes. I would also appreciate it if you could tell me if a proof of this fact has to do with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in general.







      linear-algebra ordinary-differential-equations physics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      user446153user446153

      1075




      1075




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



          $$ fracd^2dt^2 left[beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_n endarrayright] = left[beginarrayccc k_11 & cdots & k_1n \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_1n & cdots & k_nn endarrayright] left[ beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_nendarrayright]$$



          $$ fracd^2dt^2 vecx = K vecx$$



          The matrix $K=[k_ij]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



          We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



          Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



          Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^-1 K V$.



          We can now write the system of differential equations as,



          $$
          fracd^2dt^2 vecx = V Lambda V^-1 vecx
          $$



          $$
          V^-1fracd^2dt^2 vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
          $$



          $$
          fracd^2dt^2 V^-1vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
          $$



          Let $vecy = V^-1 vecx$, then we have $
          fracd^2dt^2 vecy = Lambda vecy
          $
          . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



          $$
          fracd^2 y_1dt^2 = lambda_1 y_1
          $$

          $$
          fracd^2 y_2dt^2 = lambda_2 y_2
          $$

          $$
          vdots
          $$

          $$
          fracd^2 y_ndt^2 = lambda_n y_n
          $$



          Clearly the solutions are of the form,



          $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^sqrtlambda_j t + C_2 e^-sqrtlambda_j t,$$



          to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



          $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_ji y_i(t)$$



          Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196600%2fproving-that-any-solution-to-the-differential-equation-of-an-oscillator-can-be-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



            $$ fracd^2dt^2 left[beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_n endarrayright] = left[beginarrayccc k_11 & cdots & k_1n \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_1n & cdots & k_nn endarrayright] left[ beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_nendarrayright]$$



            $$ fracd^2dt^2 vecx = K vecx$$



            The matrix $K=[k_ij]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



            We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



            Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



            Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^-1 K V$.



            We can now write the system of differential equations as,



            $$
            fracd^2dt^2 vecx = V Lambda V^-1 vecx
            $$



            $$
            V^-1fracd^2dt^2 vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
            $$



            $$
            fracd^2dt^2 V^-1vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
            $$



            Let $vecy = V^-1 vecx$, then we have $
            fracd^2dt^2 vecy = Lambda vecy
            $
            . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



            $$
            fracd^2 y_1dt^2 = lambda_1 y_1
            $$

            $$
            fracd^2 y_2dt^2 = lambda_2 y_2
            $$

            $$
            vdots
            $$

            $$
            fracd^2 y_ndt^2 = lambda_n y_n
            $$



            Clearly the solutions are of the form,



            $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^sqrtlambda_j t + C_2 e^-sqrtlambda_j t,$$



            to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



            $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_ji y_i(t)$$



            Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



              $$ fracd^2dt^2 left[beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_n endarrayright] = left[beginarrayccc k_11 & cdots & k_1n \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_1n & cdots & k_nn endarrayright] left[ beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_nendarrayright]$$



              $$ fracd^2dt^2 vecx = K vecx$$



              The matrix $K=[k_ij]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



              We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



              Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



              Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^-1 K V$.



              We can now write the system of differential equations as,



              $$
              fracd^2dt^2 vecx = V Lambda V^-1 vecx
              $$



              $$
              V^-1fracd^2dt^2 vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
              $$



              $$
              fracd^2dt^2 V^-1vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
              $$



              Let $vecy = V^-1 vecx$, then we have $
              fracd^2dt^2 vecy = Lambda vecy
              $
              . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



              $$
              fracd^2 y_1dt^2 = lambda_1 y_1
              $$

              $$
              fracd^2 y_2dt^2 = lambda_2 y_2
              $$

              $$
              vdots
              $$

              $$
              fracd^2 y_ndt^2 = lambda_n y_n
              $$



              Clearly the solutions are of the form,



              $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^sqrtlambda_j t + C_2 e^-sqrtlambda_j t,$$



              to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



              $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_ji y_i(t)$$



              Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



                $$ fracd^2dt^2 left[beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_n endarrayright] = left[beginarrayccc k_11 & cdots & k_1n \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_1n & cdots & k_nn endarrayright] left[ beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_nendarrayright]$$



                $$ fracd^2dt^2 vecx = K vecx$$



                The matrix $K=[k_ij]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



                We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



                Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



                Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^-1 K V$.



                We can now write the system of differential equations as,



                $$
                fracd^2dt^2 vecx = V Lambda V^-1 vecx
                $$



                $$
                V^-1fracd^2dt^2 vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
                $$



                $$
                fracd^2dt^2 V^-1vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
                $$



                Let $vecy = V^-1 vecx$, then we have $
                fracd^2dt^2 vecy = Lambda vecy
                $
                . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



                $$
                fracd^2 y_1dt^2 = lambda_1 y_1
                $$

                $$
                fracd^2 y_2dt^2 = lambda_2 y_2
                $$

                $$
                vdots
                $$

                $$
                fracd^2 y_ndt^2 = lambda_n y_n
                $$



                Clearly the solutions are of the form,



                $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^sqrtlambda_j t + C_2 e^-sqrtlambda_j t,$$



                to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



                $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_ji y_i(t)$$



                Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



                $$ fracd^2dt^2 left[beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_n endarrayright] = left[beginarrayccc k_11 & cdots & k_1n \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_1n & cdots & k_nn endarrayright] left[ beginarrayc x_1 \ vdots \ x_nendarrayright]$$



                $$ fracd^2dt^2 vecx = K vecx$$



                The matrix $K=[k_ij]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



                We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



                Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



                Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^-1 K V$.



                We can now write the system of differential equations as,



                $$
                fracd^2dt^2 vecx = V Lambda V^-1 vecx
                $$



                $$
                V^-1fracd^2dt^2 vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
                $$



                $$
                fracd^2dt^2 V^-1vecx = Lambda V^-1 vecx
                $$



                Let $vecy = V^-1 vecx$, then we have $
                fracd^2dt^2 vecy = Lambda vecy
                $
                . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



                $$
                fracd^2 y_1dt^2 = lambda_1 y_1
                $$

                $$
                fracd^2 y_2dt^2 = lambda_2 y_2
                $$

                $$
                vdots
                $$

                $$
                fracd^2 y_ndt^2 = lambda_n y_n
                $$



                Clearly the solutions are of the form,



                $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^sqrtlambda_j t + C_2 e^-sqrtlambda_j t,$$



                to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



                $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_ji y_i(t)$$



                Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                SpencerSpencer

                8,76812156




                8,76812156



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196600%2fproving-that-any-solution-to-the-differential-equation-of-an-oscillator-can-be-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Oświęcim Innehåll Historia | Källor | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmeny50°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.2213950°2′18″N 19°13′17″Ö / 50.03833°N 19.22139°Ö / 50.03833; 19.221393089658Nordisk familjebok, AuschwitzInsidan tro och existensJewish Community i OświęcimAuschwitz Jewish Center: MuseumAuschwitz Jewish Center

                    Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6

                    Chelodina Espezieak | Nabigazio menuaEOLGBIFITISNCBI