Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closedExhaustion of open sets by closed setsNatural non-trivial topology on $mathbb R$ such that there are more than $2^mathbb N$ open setswhy use open interval rather than closed interval as open sets for real line topologyA non-trivial Hausdorff topology on XClosed sets in Noetherian topologyIn the finite complement topology on $mathbbR$, is the subset $ x $ closed?Are closed sets in topology?For which topologies are the concepts of open and closed “interchangeable”?How to determine which sets are open in a topology?Inclusion of open sets in closed sets of Zariski topology

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

ERC721: How to get the owned tokens of an address

Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35

Can I use USB data pins as a power source?

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?

How do you talk to someone whose loved one is dying?

A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?

Is there a place to find the pricing for things not mentioned in the PHB? (non-magical)

Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?

Most cost effective thermostat setting: consistent temperature vs. lowest temperature possible

Are ETF trackers fundamentally better than individual stocks?

Knife as defense against stray dogs

Does multi-classing into Fighter give you heavy armor proficiency?

If I can solve Sudoku, can I solve the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP)? If so, how?

PTIJ: Who should I vote for? (21st Knesset Edition)

English sentence unclear

When to use a slotted vs. solid turner?

Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?

Official degrees of earth’s rotation per day

What's the meaning of a knight fighting a snail in medieval book illustrations?

Why do tuner card drivers fail to build after kernel update to 4.4.0-143-generic?

Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

et qui - how do you really understand that kind of phraseology?



Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closed


Exhaustion of open sets by closed setsNatural non-trivial topology on $mathbb R$ such that there are more than $2^mathbb N$ open setswhy use open interval rather than closed interval as open sets for real line topologyA non-trivial Hausdorff topology on XClosed sets in Noetherian topologyIn the finite complement topology on $mathbbR$, is the subset $ x $ closed?Are closed sets in topology?For which topologies are the concepts of open and closed “interchangeable”?How to determine which sets are open in a topology?Inclusion of open sets in closed sets of Zariski topology













2












$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non-trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non-trivial topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has a non-finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    4 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non-trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non-trivial topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has a non-finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    4 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non-trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non-trivial topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has a non-finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non-trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non-trivial topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has a non-finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









YuiTo Cheng

2,0532637




2,0532637










asked 5 hours ago









ThomThom

346111




346111







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    4 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    4 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    5












    $begingroup$

    You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
    $$
    varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
    $$

    You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
      $endgroup$
      – Arturo Magidin
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
      $endgroup$
      – Thom
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
      $endgroup$
      – Arturo Magidin
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Thom
      4 hours ago










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151030%2fnon-trivial-topology-where-only-open-sets-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



    Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



    Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



    Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



    Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



    We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



      Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



      Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



      Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



      Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



      We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



        Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



        Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



        Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



        Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



        We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



        Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



        Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



        Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



        Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



        We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin

        265k34590918




        265k34590918





















            5












            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              4 hours ago















            5












            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              4 hours ago













            5












            5








            5





            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 4 hours ago









            RandallRandall

            10.6k11431




            10.6k11431











            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              4 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              4 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            4 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            4 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            4 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            4 hours ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151030%2fnon-trivial-topology-where-only-open-sets-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            ZWssociz2A4THcKv8joi7QHg5WOx4rk wwiCblx6nl6OuA QJ0zU9v
            JsChfuN3SnLtwKr8Elf,nmnZGAq 8GDT BKp18Rsemhf35RGiFj,6nxaXqRq,bB,3Z6 O5qz1MkKKSypzAb6 Ve73i1zaxngbSpLB98

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the result of assigning to std::vector::begin()? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What does the explicit keyword mean?Concatenating two std::vectorsHow to find out if an item is present in a std::vector?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?What is the “-->” operator in C++?What is the easiest way to initialize a std::vector with hardcoded elements?What is The Rule of Three?What are the basic rules and idioms for operator overloading?Why are std::begin and std::end “not memory safe”?

            Creating centerline of river in QGIS? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding centrelines from polygons in QGIS?Splitting line into two lines with GRASS GIS?Centroid of the equator and a pointpostgis: problems creating flow direction polyline; not all needed connections are drawnhow to make decent sense from scattered river depth measurementsQGIS Interpolation on Curved Grid (River DEMs)How to create automatic parking baysShortest path creation between two linesclipping layer using query builder in QGISFinding which side of closest polyline point lies on in QGIS?Create centerline from multi-digitized roadway lines Qgis 2.18Getting bathymetric contours confined only within river banks using QGIS?