Arsthbt

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

Print a physical multiplication table

Aluminum electrolytic or ceramic capacitors for linear regulator input and output?

et qui - how do you really understand that kind of phraseology?

English sentence unclear

ERC721: How to get the owned tokens of an address

What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?

Simplify an interface for flexibly applying rules to periods of time

As a new Ubuntu desktop 18.04 LTS user, do I need to use ufw for a firewall or is iptables sufficient?

What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?

Professor being mistaken for a grad student

Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D minor breaks the "no parallel octaves" rule?

Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?

Math equation in non italic font

PTIJ: Who should I vote for? (21st Knesset Edition)

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?

Is "upgrade" the right word to use in this context?

Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35

What is a ^ b and (a & b) << 1?

Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?

Is it good practice to use Linear Least-Squares with SMA?

How to pronounce "I ♥ Huckabees"?

Custom alignment for GeoMarkers

Tikz picture of two mathematical functions

Remove asymptote of a functionPgfplots : can't plot some usual mathematical functionsHow can I create new commands in TikZ?Mathematical symbols as keywords in listingSpan TikZ Picture Across Two ColumnsWolfram Mathematica Functions in LyxPGF Contour Plot with complicated (nested) functionspgfplots wrongly calculate pgfplots@data@xmin in the case of mixed plots (with and without error bar)Tikz picture: Volume between two surfacesFill between two functionsTikz picture using two “foreach” loops

1

0

I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows

begintikzpicture
beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$, ylabel=$s$]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
endaxis
endtikzpicture

I obtained the picture:

But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:

Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?

tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica

share|improve this question

asked 10 hours ago

MarkMark

20216

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)); addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);.
  
  – marmot
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

0

I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows

begintikzpicture
beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$, ylabel=$s$]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
endaxis
endtikzpicture

I obtained the picture:

But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:

Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?

tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica

share|improve this question

asked 10 hours ago

MarkMark

20216

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)); addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);.
  
  – marmot
  10 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows

begintikzpicture
beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$, ylabel=$s$]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
endaxis
endtikzpicture

I obtained the picture:

But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:

Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?

tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica

share|improve this question

asked 10 hours ago

MarkMark

20216

begintikzpicture
beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$, ylabel=$s$]
addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
addplot[red, ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
endaxis
endtikzpicture

share|improve this question

asked 10 hours ago

MarkMark

20216

share|improve this question

asked 10 hours ago

MarkMark

20216

asked 10 hours ago

MarkMark

20216

asked 10 hours ago

MarkMark

20216

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

5

The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
usepackagepgfplots
pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
begindocument
begintikzpicture
 beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$,
 ylabel=$s$,unbounded coords=discard]
 addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 endaxis
endtikzpicture
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 10 hours ago

marmotmarmot

109k5134252

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?
  
  – Mark
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.
  
  – marmot
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479823%2ftikz-picture-of-two-mathematical-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

5

The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
usepackagepgfplots
pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
begindocument
begintikzpicture
 beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$,
 ylabel=$s$,unbounded coords=discard]
 addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 endaxis
endtikzpicture
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 10 hours ago

marmotmarmot

109k5134252

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?
  
  – Mark
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.
  
  – marmot
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

5

The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
usepackagepgfplots
pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
begindocument
begintikzpicture
 beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$,
 ylabel=$s$,unbounded coords=discard]
 addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 endaxis
endtikzpicture
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 10 hours ago

marmotmarmot

109k5134252

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?
  
  – Mark
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.
  
  – marmot
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
usepackagepgfplots
pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
begindocument
begintikzpicture
 beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$,
 ylabel=$s$,unbounded coords=discard]
 addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 endaxis
endtikzpicture
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 10 hours ago

marmotmarmot

109k5134252

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
usepackagepgfplots
pgfplotssetcompat=1.16
begindocument
begintikzpicture
 beginaxis[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel=$c$,
 ylabel=$s$,unbounded coords=discard]
 addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 addplot[red, ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);
 endaxis
endtikzpicture
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 10 hours ago

marmotmarmot

109k5134252

answered 10 hours ago

marmotmarmot

109k5134252

answered 10 hours ago

marmotmarmot

109k5134252