How much radiation do nowadays nuclear physics experiments impose on researcher Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How much radiation exposure in the US was caused by the 105 nuke tests in the Pacific?Nuclear physics from perturbative QFTDrop a star in a riverIn the Iranian nuclear deal, how can IAEA detect nuclear activity after 24 days?How much damage do high energy experiments impose on the LHC detection equipment?Cesium-137 From Fukushima MeltdownCan We “Tune” The Radiation Output Of a Nuclear Device.?How would a nuclear explosion look in vacuum?In discussions of nuclear radiation, why comparitively scant mention of neutron radiation?Is there a link between nuclear radiation and sound?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Does polymorph use a PC’s CR or its level?

Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?

When to stop saving and start investing?

Truth table with logical gates for a traffic light

Is there a concise way to say "all of the X, one of each"?

Black holes as heat sinks

Tic tac toe game in a web browser

How to draw this diagram using TikZ package?

Create Pages from Database

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

What are the pros and cons of Aerospike nosecones?

Are variable time comparisons always a security risk in cryptography code?

The logistics of corpse disposal

How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?

How to pronounce "criar"?

Regex in IF condition in awk

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

How can I fade player when goes inside or outside of the area?

Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

What are the options for player characters to create traps?

Can inflation occur in a positive-sum game currency system such as the Stack Exchange reputation system?

grandmas drink with lemon juice



How much radiation do nowadays nuclear physics experiments impose on researcher



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How much radiation exposure in the US was caused by the 105 nuke tests in the Pacific?Nuclear physics from perturbative QFTDrop a star in a riverIn the Iranian nuclear deal, how can IAEA detect nuclear activity after 24 days?How much damage do high energy experiments impose on the LHC detection equipment?Cesium-137 From Fukushima MeltdownCan We “Tune” The Radiation Output Of a Nuclear Device.?How would a nuclear explosion look in vacuum?In discussions of nuclear radiation, why comparitively scant mention of neutron radiation?Is there a link between nuclear radiation and sound?










5












$begingroup$


I am curious about how much radiation do experimental nuclear physics researchers/students suffer in nowadays research environment. I know this may be a dumb question, but I have can found answer nowhere.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, that'll depend on what you mean by "nuclear physics experiments". The term can describe accelerator experiments, working with research reactors, or doing chemistry research with radioactive elements, among others, and each will have its own particular safety profile. The answer then ranges from "negligible so long as reasonable practices are followed" through to "about the maximum allowed by health-and-safety regulations, with radiation-dosage considerations dictating much of the experimental design".
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As it stands, the question is unanswerable (or, rather, has no single unique answer), which is probably one of the core reasons why you couldn't find concrete numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilioPisanty I am completely new to this field. Thanks a lot that you let me know where to start and get to know about these things :)
    $endgroup$
    – ConwL
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    As @EmilioPisanty said, it is difficult to quantify in the current state of your question. But generally speaking, physicists are to exposed to next-to-nothing in nearly all experiments which involve radioactive material. This is mostly due to appropriate protection. If you are not a physicist but a professional sports player and you regularly require CT scans, your exposure to radioactivity is far higher.
    $endgroup$
    – lmr
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    By way of comparison, during my whole PhD, I have got only 0.1 mSv from work-related sources.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    50 mins ago















5












$begingroup$


I am curious about how much radiation do experimental nuclear physics researchers/students suffer in nowadays research environment. I know this may be a dumb question, but I have can found answer nowhere.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, that'll depend on what you mean by "nuclear physics experiments". The term can describe accelerator experiments, working with research reactors, or doing chemistry research with radioactive elements, among others, and each will have its own particular safety profile. The answer then ranges from "negligible so long as reasonable practices are followed" through to "about the maximum allowed by health-and-safety regulations, with radiation-dosage considerations dictating much of the experimental design".
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As it stands, the question is unanswerable (or, rather, has no single unique answer), which is probably one of the core reasons why you couldn't find concrete numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilioPisanty I am completely new to this field. Thanks a lot that you let me know where to start and get to know about these things :)
    $endgroup$
    – ConwL
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    As @EmilioPisanty said, it is difficult to quantify in the current state of your question. But generally speaking, physicists are to exposed to next-to-nothing in nearly all experiments which involve radioactive material. This is mostly due to appropriate protection. If you are not a physicist but a professional sports player and you regularly require CT scans, your exposure to radioactivity is far higher.
    $endgroup$
    – lmr
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    By way of comparison, during my whole PhD, I have got only 0.1 mSv from work-related sources.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    50 mins ago













5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


I am curious about how much radiation do experimental nuclear physics researchers/students suffer in nowadays research environment. I know this may be a dumb question, but I have can found answer nowhere.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am curious about how much radiation do experimental nuclear physics researchers/students suffer in nowadays research environment. I know this may be a dumb question, but I have can found answer nowhere.







experimental-physics nuclear-physics radiation






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









ConwLConwL

262




262




New contributor




ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






ConwL is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, that'll depend on what you mean by "nuclear physics experiments". The term can describe accelerator experiments, working with research reactors, or doing chemistry research with radioactive elements, among others, and each will have its own particular safety profile. The answer then ranges from "negligible so long as reasonable practices are followed" through to "about the maximum allowed by health-and-safety regulations, with radiation-dosage considerations dictating much of the experimental design".
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As it stands, the question is unanswerable (or, rather, has no single unique answer), which is probably one of the core reasons why you couldn't find concrete numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilioPisanty I am completely new to this field. Thanks a lot that you let me know where to start and get to know about these things :)
    $endgroup$
    – ConwL
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    As @EmilioPisanty said, it is difficult to quantify in the current state of your question. But generally speaking, physicists are to exposed to next-to-nothing in nearly all experiments which involve radioactive material. This is mostly due to appropriate protection. If you are not a physicist but a professional sports player and you regularly require CT scans, your exposure to radioactivity is far higher.
    $endgroup$
    – lmr
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    By way of comparison, during my whole PhD, I have got only 0.1 mSv from work-related sources.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    50 mins ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, that'll depend on what you mean by "nuclear physics experiments". The term can describe accelerator experiments, working with research reactors, or doing chemistry research with radioactive elements, among others, and each will have its own particular safety profile. The answer then ranges from "negligible so long as reasonable practices are followed" through to "about the maximum allowed by health-and-safety regulations, with radiation-dosage considerations dictating much of the experimental design".
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As it stands, the question is unanswerable (or, rather, has no single unique answer), which is probably one of the core reasons why you couldn't find concrete numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilioPisanty I am completely new to this field. Thanks a lot that you let me know where to start and get to know about these things :)
    $endgroup$
    – ConwL
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    As @EmilioPisanty said, it is difficult to quantify in the current state of your question. But generally speaking, physicists are to exposed to next-to-nothing in nearly all experiments which involve radioactive material. This is mostly due to appropriate protection. If you are not a physicist but a professional sports player and you regularly require CT scans, your exposure to radioactivity is far higher.
    $endgroup$
    – lmr
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    By way of comparison, during my whole PhD, I have got only 0.1 mSv from work-related sources.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    50 mins ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Well, that'll depend on what you mean by "nuclear physics experiments". The term can describe accelerator experiments, working with research reactors, or doing chemistry research with radioactive elements, among others, and each will have its own particular safety profile. The answer then ranges from "negligible so long as reasonable practices are followed" through to "about the maximum allowed by health-and-safety regulations, with radiation-dosage considerations dictating much of the experimental design".
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Well, that'll depend on what you mean by "nuclear physics experiments". The term can describe accelerator experiments, working with research reactors, or doing chemistry research with radioactive elements, among others, and each will have its own particular safety profile. The answer then ranges from "negligible so long as reasonable practices are followed" through to "about the maximum allowed by health-and-safety regulations, with radiation-dosage considerations dictating much of the experimental design".
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
As it stands, the question is unanswerable (or, rather, has no single unique answer), which is probably one of the core reasons why you couldn't find concrete numbers.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
As it stands, the question is unanswerable (or, rather, has no single unique answer), which is probably one of the core reasons why you couldn't find concrete numbers.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@EmilioPisanty I am completely new to this field. Thanks a lot that you let me know where to start and get to know about these things :)
$endgroup$
– ConwL
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
@EmilioPisanty I am completely new to this field. Thanks a lot that you let me know where to start and get to know about these things :)
$endgroup$
– ConwL
2 hours ago













$begingroup$
As @EmilioPisanty said, it is difficult to quantify in the current state of your question. But generally speaking, physicists are to exposed to next-to-nothing in nearly all experiments which involve radioactive material. This is mostly due to appropriate protection. If you are not a physicist but a professional sports player and you regularly require CT scans, your exposure to radioactivity is far higher.
$endgroup$
– lmr
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
As @EmilioPisanty said, it is difficult to quantify in the current state of your question. But generally speaking, physicists are to exposed to next-to-nothing in nearly all experiments which involve radioactive material. This is mostly due to appropriate protection. If you are not a physicist but a professional sports player and you regularly require CT scans, your exposure to radioactivity is far higher.
$endgroup$
– lmr
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
By way of comparison, during my whole PhD, I have got only 0.1 mSv from work-related sources.
$endgroup$
– Loong
50 mins ago




$begingroup$
By way of comparison, during my whole PhD, I have got only 0.1 mSv from work-related sources.
$endgroup$
– Loong
50 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

In the US, the NRC limits whole-body occupational exposure to 5 rem/year. Specific labs or employers may impose much lower limits on their workers. For comparison, a CT scan is about 1 rem, and natural background is about 0.2-0.7 rem. There is not really any typical dose for people working on experiments. Depending on what their work is and how the experiment is set up, someone could have a dose that is not measurably higher than background. Or their measured dose could mount to the level where they're warned that they're nearing their limit for the year, in which case they might have to find someone else to whom to hand off the task that's causing all the exposure.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    For me to be authorized to receive 5 rem/year would require the signature of the Secretary of Energy. My current authorization is not to exceed 100 mrem/yr. Over the 30 odd years I've worked on ion accelerators and pulsed power I think I exceeded background once (and it wasn't quite clear how - likely a TLD read error), so something like 20 mrem above background total over those 30 years.
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JonCuster: Thanks for the comment. I've edited to say that specific labs have lower limits than the NRC's regulatory limit. I'm curious about your lab's rules, though. Can they even measure background well enough to know if your exposure is above background by an amount as tiny as 20 mrem? At some point with these very small doses, it gets silly, e.g., you could go over your limit by mistakenly taking your badge home to your house that has radon in it.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    As another anecdote, I used to work at a DoE lab where basically any detectable amount above background was too much. At some point, it does get silly - I remember hearing stories about painstakingly remediating an area for an outdoor patio to eat lunch, despite the fact that someone could get a higher radiation dose by eating a banana on the finished patio.
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    23 mins ago


















2












$begingroup$

In 1990 de International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) as recommended the following radiation dose limits to workers and to the general public:



  • 100 mSv in 5 years of effective dose for workers (maximum 50 mSv
    in any single year, average 20 mSv per year) of any branch, including
    medicine, industry, research, etc.

  • 1 mSv per year to the general members of the public;

These recommendations have been implemented with minor changes into regulations in most countries, including the US and the European countries.



Radiations workers are obliged to use a personal dosimeter to record the amount of radiation they are exposed to. In my particular experience, most of workers don’t get more that 5 mSv in a single year, unless a radiation incident has occur, that’s why values higher than that used to be investigated. In fact I would investigate any reading in a particular workers dosimeter above the natural background.



The 1990 recommendations of ICRP have been recently updated, with almost no change to these values.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    According to the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), the average occupational radiation exposure (in mSv per year) in the group “research” (19489 persons in 2016) in the last years was as follows.



    0.37 (2007)

    0.41 (2008)

    0.36 (2009)

    0.35 (2010)

    0.33 (2011)

    0.35 (2012)

    0.30 (2013)

    0.28 (2014)

    0.26 (2015)

    0.27 (2016)



    These values are generally lower than in other groups (medicine, industry, nuclear, flight personnel, or radon workplace).



    Note that the dose limit for workers of category A is an effective dose of 20 mSv per year, averaged over defined 5 year periods (100 mSv in 5 years), with the further provision that the effective dose must not exceed 50 mSv in any single year. Nevertheless, the radiation exposure should be as low as reasonably achievable.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      ConwL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472900%2fhow-much-radiation-do-nowadays-nuclear-physics-experiments-impose-on-researcher%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      In the US, the NRC limits whole-body occupational exposure to 5 rem/year. Specific labs or employers may impose much lower limits on their workers. For comparison, a CT scan is about 1 rem, and natural background is about 0.2-0.7 rem. There is not really any typical dose for people working on experiments. Depending on what their work is and how the experiment is set up, someone could have a dose that is not measurably higher than background. Or their measured dose could mount to the level where they're warned that they're nearing their limit for the year, in which case they might have to find someone else to whom to hand off the task that's causing all the exposure.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        For me to be authorized to receive 5 rem/year would require the signature of the Secretary of Energy. My current authorization is not to exceed 100 mrem/yr. Over the 30 odd years I've worked on ion accelerators and pulsed power I think I exceeded background once (and it wasn't quite clear how - likely a TLD read error), so something like 20 mrem above background total over those 30 years.
        $endgroup$
        – Jon Custer
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @JonCuster: Thanks for the comment. I've edited to say that specific labs have lower limits than the NRC's regulatory limit. I'm curious about your lab's rules, though. Can they even measure background well enough to know if your exposure is above background by an amount as tiny as 20 mrem? At some point with these very small doses, it gets silly, e.g., you could go over your limit by mistakenly taking your badge home to your house that has radon in it.
        $endgroup$
        – Ben Crowell
        1 hour ago










      • $begingroup$
        As another anecdote, I used to work at a DoE lab where basically any detectable amount above background was too much. At some point, it does get silly - I remember hearing stories about painstakingly remediating an area for an outdoor patio to eat lunch, despite the fact that someone could get a higher radiation dose by eating a banana on the finished patio.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        23 mins ago















      4












      $begingroup$

      In the US, the NRC limits whole-body occupational exposure to 5 rem/year. Specific labs or employers may impose much lower limits on their workers. For comparison, a CT scan is about 1 rem, and natural background is about 0.2-0.7 rem. There is not really any typical dose for people working on experiments. Depending on what their work is and how the experiment is set up, someone could have a dose that is not measurably higher than background. Or their measured dose could mount to the level where they're warned that they're nearing their limit for the year, in which case they might have to find someone else to whom to hand off the task that's causing all the exposure.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        For me to be authorized to receive 5 rem/year would require the signature of the Secretary of Energy. My current authorization is not to exceed 100 mrem/yr. Over the 30 odd years I've worked on ion accelerators and pulsed power I think I exceeded background once (and it wasn't quite clear how - likely a TLD read error), so something like 20 mrem above background total over those 30 years.
        $endgroup$
        – Jon Custer
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @JonCuster: Thanks for the comment. I've edited to say that specific labs have lower limits than the NRC's regulatory limit. I'm curious about your lab's rules, though. Can they even measure background well enough to know if your exposure is above background by an amount as tiny as 20 mrem? At some point with these very small doses, it gets silly, e.g., you could go over your limit by mistakenly taking your badge home to your house that has radon in it.
        $endgroup$
        – Ben Crowell
        1 hour ago










      • $begingroup$
        As another anecdote, I used to work at a DoE lab where basically any detectable amount above background was too much. At some point, it does get silly - I remember hearing stories about painstakingly remediating an area for an outdoor patio to eat lunch, despite the fact that someone could get a higher radiation dose by eating a banana on the finished patio.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        23 mins ago













      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      In the US, the NRC limits whole-body occupational exposure to 5 rem/year. Specific labs or employers may impose much lower limits on their workers. For comparison, a CT scan is about 1 rem, and natural background is about 0.2-0.7 rem. There is not really any typical dose for people working on experiments. Depending on what their work is and how the experiment is set up, someone could have a dose that is not measurably higher than background. Or their measured dose could mount to the level where they're warned that they're nearing their limit for the year, in which case they might have to find someone else to whom to hand off the task that's causing all the exposure.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      In the US, the NRC limits whole-body occupational exposure to 5 rem/year. Specific labs or employers may impose much lower limits on their workers. For comparison, a CT scan is about 1 rem, and natural background is about 0.2-0.7 rem. There is not really any typical dose for people working on experiments. Depending on what their work is and how the experiment is set up, someone could have a dose that is not measurably higher than background. Or their measured dose could mount to the level where they're warned that they're nearing their limit for the year, in which case they might have to find someone else to whom to hand off the task that's causing all the exposure.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 2 hours ago









      Ben CrowellBen Crowell

      54.2k6165313




      54.2k6165313







      • 3




        $begingroup$
        For me to be authorized to receive 5 rem/year would require the signature of the Secretary of Energy. My current authorization is not to exceed 100 mrem/yr. Over the 30 odd years I've worked on ion accelerators and pulsed power I think I exceeded background once (and it wasn't quite clear how - likely a TLD read error), so something like 20 mrem above background total over those 30 years.
        $endgroup$
        – Jon Custer
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @JonCuster: Thanks for the comment. I've edited to say that specific labs have lower limits than the NRC's regulatory limit. I'm curious about your lab's rules, though. Can they even measure background well enough to know if your exposure is above background by an amount as tiny as 20 mrem? At some point with these very small doses, it gets silly, e.g., you could go over your limit by mistakenly taking your badge home to your house that has radon in it.
        $endgroup$
        – Ben Crowell
        1 hour ago










      • $begingroup$
        As another anecdote, I used to work at a DoE lab where basically any detectable amount above background was too much. At some point, it does get silly - I remember hearing stories about painstakingly remediating an area for an outdoor patio to eat lunch, despite the fact that someone could get a higher radiation dose by eating a banana on the finished patio.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        23 mins ago












      • 3




        $begingroup$
        For me to be authorized to receive 5 rem/year would require the signature of the Secretary of Energy. My current authorization is not to exceed 100 mrem/yr. Over the 30 odd years I've worked on ion accelerators and pulsed power I think I exceeded background once (and it wasn't quite clear how - likely a TLD read error), so something like 20 mrem above background total over those 30 years.
        $endgroup$
        – Jon Custer
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @JonCuster: Thanks for the comment. I've edited to say that specific labs have lower limits than the NRC's regulatory limit. I'm curious about your lab's rules, though. Can they even measure background well enough to know if your exposure is above background by an amount as tiny as 20 mrem? At some point with these very small doses, it gets silly, e.g., you could go over your limit by mistakenly taking your badge home to your house that has radon in it.
        $endgroup$
        – Ben Crowell
        1 hour ago










      • $begingroup$
        As another anecdote, I used to work at a DoE lab where basically any detectable amount above background was too much. At some point, it does get silly - I remember hearing stories about painstakingly remediating an area for an outdoor patio to eat lunch, despite the fact that someone could get a higher radiation dose by eating a banana on the finished patio.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        23 mins ago







      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      For me to be authorized to receive 5 rem/year would require the signature of the Secretary of Energy. My current authorization is not to exceed 100 mrem/yr. Over the 30 odd years I've worked on ion accelerators and pulsed power I think I exceeded background once (and it wasn't quite clear how - likely a TLD read error), so something like 20 mrem above background total over those 30 years.
      $endgroup$
      – Jon Custer
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      For me to be authorized to receive 5 rem/year would require the signature of the Secretary of Energy. My current authorization is not to exceed 100 mrem/yr. Over the 30 odd years I've worked on ion accelerators and pulsed power I think I exceeded background once (and it wasn't quite clear how - likely a TLD read error), so something like 20 mrem above background total over those 30 years.
      $endgroup$
      – Jon Custer
      2 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      @JonCuster: Thanks for the comment. I've edited to say that specific labs have lower limits than the NRC's regulatory limit. I'm curious about your lab's rules, though. Can they even measure background well enough to know if your exposure is above background by an amount as tiny as 20 mrem? At some point with these very small doses, it gets silly, e.g., you could go over your limit by mistakenly taking your badge home to your house that has radon in it.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      1 hour ago




      $begingroup$
      @JonCuster: Thanks for the comment. I've edited to say that specific labs have lower limits than the NRC's regulatory limit. I'm curious about your lab's rules, though. Can they even measure background well enough to know if your exposure is above background by an amount as tiny as 20 mrem? At some point with these very small doses, it gets silly, e.g., you could go over your limit by mistakenly taking your badge home to your house that has radon in it.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      1 hour ago












      $begingroup$
      As another anecdote, I used to work at a DoE lab where basically any detectable amount above background was too much. At some point, it does get silly - I remember hearing stories about painstakingly remediating an area for an outdoor patio to eat lunch, despite the fact that someone could get a higher radiation dose by eating a banana on the finished patio.
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      23 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      As another anecdote, I used to work at a DoE lab where basically any detectable amount above background was too much. At some point, it does get silly - I remember hearing stories about painstakingly remediating an area for an outdoor patio to eat lunch, despite the fact that someone could get a higher radiation dose by eating a banana on the finished patio.
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      23 mins ago











      2












      $begingroup$

      In 1990 de International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) as recommended the following radiation dose limits to workers and to the general public:



      • 100 mSv in 5 years of effective dose for workers (maximum 50 mSv
        in any single year, average 20 mSv per year) of any branch, including
        medicine, industry, research, etc.

      • 1 mSv per year to the general members of the public;

      These recommendations have been implemented with minor changes into regulations in most countries, including the US and the European countries.



      Radiations workers are obliged to use a personal dosimeter to record the amount of radiation they are exposed to. In my particular experience, most of workers don’t get more that 5 mSv in a single year, unless a radiation incident has occur, that’s why values higher than that used to be investigated. In fact I would investigate any reading in a particular workers dosimeter above the natural background.



      The 1990 recommendations of ICRP have been recently updated, with almost no change to these values.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        2












        $begingroup$

        In 1990 de International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) as recommended the following radiation dose limits to workers and to the general public:



        • 100 mSv in 5 years of effective dose for workers (maximum 50 mSv
          in any single year, average 20 mSv per year) of any branch, including
          medicine, industry, research, etc.

        • 1 mSv per year to the general members of the public;

        These recommendations have been implemented with minor changes into regulations in most countries, including the US and the European countries.



        Radiations workers are obliged to use a personal dosimeter to record the amount of radiation they are exposed to. In my particular experience, most of workers don’t get more that 5 mSv in a single year, unless a radiation incident has occur, that’s why values higher than that used to be investigated. In fact I would investigate any reading in a particular workers dosimeter above the natural background.



        The 1990 recommendations of ICRP have been recently updated, with almost no change to these values.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          In 1990 de International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) as recommended the following radiation dose limits to workers and to the general public:



          • 100 mSv in 5 years of effective dose for workers (maximum 50 mSv
            in any single year, average 20 mSv per year) of any branch, including
            medicine, industry, research, etc.

          • 1 mSv per year to the general members of the public;

          These recommendations have been implemented with minor changes into regulations in most countries, including the US and the European countries.



          Radiations workers are obliged to use a personal dosimeter to record the amount of radiation they are exposed to. In my particular experience, most of workers don’t get more that 5 mSv in a single year, unless a radiation incident has occur, that’s why values higher than that used to be investigated. In fact I would investigate any reading in a particular workers dosimeter above the natural background.



          The 1990 recommendations of ICRP have been recently updated, with almost no change to these values.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          In 1990 de International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) as recommended the following radiation dose limits to workers and to the general public:



          • 100 mSv in 5 years of effective dose for workers (maximum 50 mSv
            in any single year, average 20 mSv per year) of any branch, including
            medicine, industry, research, etc.

          • 1 mSv per year to the general members of the public;

          These recommendations have been implemented with minor changes into regulations in most countries, including the US and the European countries.



          Radiations workers are obliged to use a personal dosimeter to record the amount of radiation they are exposed to. In my particular experience, most of workers don’t get more that 5 mSv in a single year, unless a radiation incident has occur, that’s why values higher than that used to be investigated. In fact I would investigate any reading in a particular workers dosimeter above the natural background.



          The 1990 recommendations of ICRP have been recently updated, with almost no change to these values.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          J. ManuelJ. Manuel

          990221




          990221





















              0












              $begingroup$

              According to the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), the average occupational radiation exposure (in mSv per year) in the group “research” (19489 persons in 2016) in the last years was as follows.



              0.37 (2007)

              0.41 (2008)

              0.36 (2009)

              0.35 (2010)

              0.33 (2011)

              0.35 (2012)

              0.30 (2013)

              0.28 (2014)

              0.26 (2015)

              0.27 (2016)



              These values are generally lower than in other groups (medicine, industry, nuclear, flight personnel, or radon workplace).



              Note that the dose limit for workers of category A is an effective dose of 20 mSv per year, averaged over defined 5 year periods (100 mSv in 5 years), with the further provision that the effective dose must not exceed 50 mSv in any single year. Nevertheless, the radiation exposure should be as low as reasonably achievable.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                According to the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), the average occupational radiation exposure (in mSv per year) in the group “research” (19489 persons in 2016) in the last years was as follows.



                0.37 (2007)

                0.41 (2008)

                0.36 (2009)

                0.35 (2010)

                0.33 (2011)

                0.35 (2012)

                0.30 (2013)

                0.28 (2014)

                0.26 (2015)

                0.27 (2016)



                These values are generally lower than in other groups (medicine, industry, nuclear, flight personnel, or radon workplace).



                Note that the dose limit for workers of category A is an effective dose of 20 mSv per year, averaged over defined 5 year periods (100 mSv in 5 years), with the further provision that the effective dose must not exceed 50 mSv in any single year. Nevertheless, the radiation exposure should be as low as reasonably achievable.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  According to the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), the average occupational radiation exposure (in mSv per year) in the group “research” (19489 persons in 2016) in the last years was as follows.



                  0.37 (2007)

                  0.41 (2008)

                  0.36 (2009)

                  0.35 (2010)

                  0.33 (2011)

                  0.35 (2012)

                  0.30 (2013)

                  0.28 (2014)

                  0.26 (2015)

                  0.27 (2016)



                  These values are generally lower than in other groups (medicine, industry, nuclear, flight personnel, or radon workplace).



                  Note that the dose limit for workers of category A is an effective dose of 20 mSv per year, averaged over defined 5 year periods (100 mSv in 5 years), with the further provision that the effective dose must not exceed 50 mSv in any single year. Nevertheless, the radiation exposure should be as low as reasonably achievable.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  According to the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), the average occupational radiation exposure (in mSv per year) in the group “research” (19489 persons in 2016) in the last years was as follows.



                  0.37 (2007)

                  0.41 (2008)

                  0.36 (2009)

                  0.35 (2010)

                  0.33 (2011)

                  0.35 (2012)

                  0.30 (2013)

                  0.28 (2014)

                  0.26 (2015)

                  0.27 (2016)



                  These values are generally lower than in other groups (medicine, industry, nuclear, flight personnel, or radon workplace).



                  Note that the dose limit for workers of category A is an effective dose of 20 mSv per year, averaged over defined 5 year periods (100 mSv in 5 years), with the further provision that the effective dose must not exceed 50 mSv in any single year. Nevertheless, the radiation exposure should be as low as reasonably achievable.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 20 mins ago









                  LoongLoong

                  1,2951120




                  1,2951120




















                      ConwL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      ConwL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      ConwL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      ConwL is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472900%2fhow-much-radiation-do-nowadays-nuclear-physics-experiments-impose-on-researcher%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown