Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digitsDivisibility by 7 rule, and Congruence Arithmetic LawsWhy is $9$ special in testing divisiblity by $9$ by summing decimal digits? (casting out nines)Divisibility criteria for $7,11,13,17,19$Divisibility Rules for Bases other than $10$divisibility for numbers like 13,17 and 19 - Compartmentalization methodTrying to prove a congruence for Stirling numbers of the second kindThe following is a necessary condition for a number to be prime, from its digit expansion. Has it been referred somewhere?Let N be a four digit number, and N' be N with its digits reversed. Prove that N-N' is divisble by 9. Prove that N+N' is divisble by 11.Digit-sum division check in base-$n$Rules of thumb for divisibilityDivisibility by 7 involving grouping and alternating sumDivisibility of a 7-digit number by 21Divisibility Rule Proof about Special Numbers

Mathematical cryptic clues

How to format long polynomial?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

What are the differences between the usage of 'it' and 'they'?

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

Test whether all array elements are factors of a number

Schoenfled Residua test shows proportionality hazard assumptions holds but Kaplan-Meier plots intersect

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Why do falling prices hurt debtors?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

Unknown notation: What do three bars mean?

Dragon forelimb placement

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Mage Armor with Defense fighting style (for Adventurers League bladeslinger)



Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits


Divisibility by 7 rule, and Congruence Arithmetic LawsWhy is $9$ special in testing divisiblity by $9$ by summing decimal digits? (casting out nines)Divisibility criteria for $7,11,13,17,19$Divisibility Rules for Bases other than $10$divisibility for numbers like 13,17 and 19 - Compartmentalization methodTrying to prove a congruence for Stirling numbers of the second kindThe following is a necessary condition for a number to be prime, from its digit expansion. Has it been referred somewhere?Let N be a four digit number, and N' be N with its digits reversed. Prove that N-N' is divisble by 9. Prove that N+N' is divisble by 11.Digit-sum division check in base-$n$Rules of thumb for divisibilityDivisibility by 7 involving grouping and alternating sumDivisibility of a 7-digit number by 21Divisibility Rule Proof about Special Numbers













2












$begingroup$


Suppose that we are given a two digit number $AB$, where $A$ and $B$ represents the digits, i.e 21 would be A=2 , B=1. I wish to prove that the sum of $AB$ and $BA$ is always divisible by $11$.
My initial idée was to use the fact that if a number is divisible by $11$ then the sum of its digits with alternating sign is also divisible by 11. For example
$$1-2+3-3+2-1=0 $$
so $11$ divides $123321$. So my proof would then be to consider the two digit number $(A+B)(B+A)$ or $CC$ which clearly is divisible by $11$ by the above statement if $C$ is $1$ through $9$. However, I am having truble justifying the case were $A+B$ is greater than or equal to $10$ and it got me wondering if the more generel is true: Let $ABCD...$ be a $n-digit$ number, if $$A-B+C-... equiv 0 (mod 11)$$
then $$S=sum_k=1^n(A+B+C+...)10^k equiv0(mod 11)$$
I am not really familliar with the whole congruence thingy, so incase the above is trivial I would be greatful on some source which could aid the solving of the above . Any tips or suggestion are also very welcome










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    5 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


Suppose that we are given a two digit number $AB$, where $A$ and $B$ represents the digits, i.e 21 would be A=2 , B=1. I wish to prove that the sum of $AB$ and $BA$ is always divisible by $11$.
My initial idée was to use the fact that if a number is divisible by $11$ then the sum of its digits with alternating sign is also divisible by 11. For example
$$1-2+3-3+2-1=0 $$
so $11$ divides $123321$. So my proof would then be to consider the two digit number $(A+B)(B+A)$ or $CC$ which clearly is divisible by $11$ by the above statement if $C$ is $1$ through $9$. However, I am having truble justifying the case were $A+B$ is greater than or equal to $10$ and it got me wondering if the more generel is true: Let $ABCD...$ be a $n-digit$ number, if $$A-B+C-... equiv 0 (mod 11)$$
then $$S=sum_k=1^n(A+B+C+...)10^k equiv0(mod 11)$$
I am not really familliar with the whole congruence thingy, so incase the above is trivial I would be greatful on some source which could aid the solving of the above . Any tips or suggestion are also very welcome










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    5 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Suppose that we are given a two digit number $AB$, where $A$ and $B$ represents the digits, i.e 21 would be A=2 , B=1. I wish to prove that the sum of $AB$ and $BA$ is always divisible by $11$.
My initial idée was to use the fact that if a number is divisible by $11$ then the sum of its digits with alternating sign is also divisible by 11. For example
$$1-2+3-3+2-1=0 $$
so $11$ divides $123321$. So my proof would then be to consider the two digit number $(A+B)(B+A)$ or $CC$ which clearly is divisible by $11$ by the above statement if $C$ is $1$ through $9$. However, I am having truble justifying the case were $A+B$ is greater than or equal to $10$ and it got me wondering if the more generel is true: Let $ABCD...$ be a $n-digit$ number, if $$A-B+C-... equiv 0 (mod 11)$$
then $$S=sum_k=1^n(A+B+C+...)10^k equiv0(mod 11)$$
I am not really familliar with the whole congruence thingy, so incase the above is trivial I would be greatful on some source which could aid the solving of the above . Any tips or suggestion are also very welcome










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose that we are given a two digit number $AB$, where $A$ and $B$ represents the digits, i.e 21 would be A=2 , B=1. I wish to prove that the sum of $AB$ and $BA$ is always divisible by $11$.
My initial idée was to use the fact that if a number is divisible by $11$ then the sum of its digits with alternating sign is also divisible by 11. For example
$$1-2+3-3+2-1=0 $$
so $11$ divides $123321$. So my proof would then be to consider the two digit number $(A+B)(B+A)$ or $CC$ which clearly is divisible by $11$ by the above statement if $C$ is $1$ through $9$. However, I am having truble justifying the case were $A+B$ is greater than or equal to $10$ and it got me wondering if the more generel is true: Let $ABCD...$ be a $n-digit$ number, if $$A-B+C-... equiv 0 (mod 11)$$
then $$S=sum_k=1^n(A+B+C+...)10^k equiv0(mod 11)$$
I am not really familliar with the whole congruence thingy, so incase the above is trivial I would be greatful on some source which could aid the solving of the above . Any tips or suggestion are also very welcome







divisibility






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago







André Armatowski

















asked 5 hours ago









André ArmatowskiAndré Armatowski

233




233











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    5 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    5 hours ago















$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
5 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

More generally, recall that the radix $rm,b,$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0,, $ where $rm P(x) = d_n x^n +cdots+ d_1 x + d_0., $ Recall the reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bf tilde rm P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bf tilde rm P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bf tilde rm P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $rm,b=10, n=1$.



Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $rm,b,$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



    We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



    It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Very clean, totally escaped me!
      $endgroup$
      – André Armatowski
      5 hours ago


















    1












    $begingroup$

    You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177167%2fcan-divisibility-rules-for-digits-be-generalized-to-sum-of-digits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      More generally, recall that the radix $rm,b,$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0,, $ where $rm P(x) = d_n x^n +cdots+ d_1 x + d_0., $ Recall the reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bf tilde rm P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bf tilde rm P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bf tilde rm P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $rm,b=10, n=1$.



      Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $rm,b,$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        More generally, recall that the radix $rm,b,$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0,, $ where $rm P(x) = d_n x^n +cdots+ d_1 x + d_0., $ Recall the reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bf tilde rm P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bf tilde rm P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bf tilde rm P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $rm,b=10, n=1$.



        Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $rm,b,$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          More generally, recall that the radix $rm,b,$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0,, $ where $rm P(x) = d_n x^n +cdots+ d_1 x + d_0., $ Recall the reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bf tilde rm P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bf tilde rm P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bf tilde rm P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $rm,b=10, n=1$.



          Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $rm,b,$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          More generally, recall that the radix $rm,b,$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0,, $ where $rm P(x) = d_n x^n +cdots+ d_1 x + d_0., $ Recall the reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bf tilde rm P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bf tilde rm P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bf tilde rm P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $rm,b=10, n=1$.



          Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $rm,b,$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 4 hours ago









          Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

          213k29196654




          213k29196654





















              3












              $begingroup$

              It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



              We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



              It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Very clean, totally escaped me!
                $endgroup$
                – André Armatowski
                5 hours ago















              3












              $begingroup$

              It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



              We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



              It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Very clean, totally escaped me!
                $endgroup$
                – André Armatowski
                5 hours ago













              3












              3








              3





              $begingroup$

              It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



              We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



              It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



              We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



              It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited 5 hours ago

























              answered 5 hours ago









              lulululu

              43.4k25080




              43.4k25080











              • $begingroup$
                Very clean, totally escaped me!
                $endgroup$
                – André Armatowski
                5 hours ago
















              • $begingroup$
                Very clean, totally escaped me!
                $endgroup$
                – André Armatowski
                5 hours ago















              $begingroup$
              Very clean, totally escaped me!
              $endgroup$
              – André Armatowski
              5 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Very clean, totally escaped me!
              $endgroup$
              – André Armatowski
              5 hours ago











              1












              $begingroup$

              You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 5 hours ago









                  Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin

                  266k34590920




                  266k34590920



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177167%2fcan-divisibility-rules-for-digits-be-generalized-to-sum-of-digits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bett Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Bettformen | Bettgrößen | Andere Bezeichnungen | Bettenmangel | Betten in der bildenden Kunst | Schlafmedizinische Gesichtspunkte | Siehe auch | Literatur | Weblinks | Einzelnachweise | NavigationsmenüBett, Bettstatt, BettstelleCommons: BettBabybetten: Anwendung, Ausstattungsmerkmale und VergleichskriterienWasserbetten. Vorurteile im TestHapfnNursch10.1007/s11818-012-0584-74006250-8AKS4329276-8

                      Luksemburg Sisukord Nimi | Asend | Loodus | Riigikord | Haldusjaotus | Rahvastik | Riigikaitse | Majandus | Taristu | Ajalugu | Eesti ja Luksemburgi suhted | Haridus | Kultuur | Vaata ka | Viited | Välislingid | Navigeerimismenüü50° N, 6° EÜlevaade Luksemburgi kaitsealadest.Luksemburgi rahvaarv. Statistikaamet.World Bank'i andmebaasÜlevaade Luksemburgi loodusest.Ülevaade Luksemburgi metsadest.Guy Colling. "Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg." Travaux scientifiques du Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg. 2005.Luxembourg’s biodiversity at risk.Maailma kahepaiksete andmebaas.Denis Lepage. "Luxembourg." Avibase.Ülevaade temperatuuridest. Luksemburgi meteoroloogiateenistus.Ülevaade Luksemburgist. Euroopa Liidu esinduse koduleht.Système politique. TerritoireÜlevaade Luksemburgi rahvastikust. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.The World FactbookMonique Borsenberger, Paul Dickes. "Religions au Luxembourg. Quelle évolution entre 1999-2008". Luksemburgi statistikaamet. 2011.Luksemburgi peapiiskopkond. Catholic-Hierarchy.Luksemburgi armee koduleht.Luksemburgi armee relvastus.Eesti Välisministeerium.Luksemburgi rahvastik. Luksemburgi statistikaamet.Luksemburgi Eesti Seltsi koduleht.Helen Eelrand. "Raadio, mis muutis maailma." Eesti Päevaleht. 13. märts 2004.Ülevaade Luksemburgi haridussüsteemist.Ülevaade Luksemburgi keskkoolidest.Luksemburgr

                      Valle di Casies Indice Geografia fisica | Origini del nome | Storia | Società | Amministrazione | Sport | Note | Bibliografia | Voci correlate | Altri progetti | Collegamenti esterni | Menu di navigazione46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)46°46′N 12°11′E / 46.766667°N 12.183333°E46.766667; 12.183333 (Valle di Casies)Sito istituzionaleAstat Censimento della popolazione 2011 - Determinazione della consistenza dei tre gruppi linguistici della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige - giugno 2012Numeri e fattiValle di CasiesDato IstatTabella dei gradi/giorno dei Comuni italiani raggruppati per Regione e Provincia26 agosto 1993, n. 412Heraldry of the World: GsiesStatistiche I.StatValCasies.comWikimedia CommonsWikimedia CommonsValle di CasiesSito ufficialeValle di CasiesMM14870458910042978-6